1.Study of apparent diffusion coefficient value in breasts of different ages and different menstrual phases
Ping ZHU ; Yafei WANG ; Hao HUANG ; Qinfang LIU ; Yerong CHEN ; Jishan TAN
Chinese Journal of Radiology 2011;45(6):538-542
Objective To analyze the differences of ADC values in breasts of women of different ages and different menstrual phases, so as to direct the choice of the examination time of MR DWI. MethodsThe breasts of 65 healthy volunteers were scanned with the routine MRI plain scan and DWI in the menstrual, proliferative and secretary phases. DWI was conducted with single shot echo planar imaging technique and b value were 0, 1000 s/mm2. The women were divided into three groups: Group 1(aged 20 to 29 years, 21 cases), Group 2 (aged 30 to 39, 21cases), and Group 3 (aged 40 to 49, 23 cases). The ADC values of all 130 breasts at nipple level in the different phases were measured. The ADC values in the three age groups and in the different menstrual phases were compared using ANOVA. Results The mean ADC values of Group 1 were (2.14±0.14) ×10-3, (2.03±0.18) ×10-3and (2.10±0.19)×10-3mm2/s for left breast, and (2.08±0.17) ×10-3, (2.02±0.16) ×10-3and (2.09±0.17) ×10-3mm2/s for right breast in the menstrual, proliferative and secretary phases. They were slightly higher than Group 3, which were (2.02±0.27) ×10-3, (1.97±0.25) ×10-3and (2.03±0.22)×10-3 mm2/s for left breast and (1.99±0.29) ×10-3, (1.93±0.26) ×10-3and (2.03±0.28)×10-3 mm2/s for right breast. The mean ADC values of Group 2 [left breast: (1.94±0.25) ×10-3, (1.91±0.21) ×10-3and (1.97±0.21)×10-3 mm2/s ; right breast: (1.97±0.26)×10-3, (1.89±0.25)×10-3and (1.96±0.22)×10-3 mm2/s) were the lowest among the three age groups. There were significant differences in different menstrual phases (F= 23.600, P<0.01), but no statistical difference was found among the three age groups or between left breasts and right breasts (F= 1.683, 2.248;P>0.05).Conclusions The mean ADC values of breasts decrease markedly in the proliferative phase.The effects of the menstrual cycle on the breast ADC values should be considered in the evaluation of breast diseases with DWI.
2.Drug sensitivity analysis of Enterococcus f aecium and Enterococcus f aecalis isolates from 2011 to 2013
Ziying ZOU ; Yuan LIU ; Bing ZHU ; Jishan TAN ; Zonghai HU ; Ping ZENG
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2014;(18):2446-2447,2450
Objective To explore the sensitivity of Enterococcus f aecium and Enterococcus f aecalis isolated from 2011 to 2013 and provide reference for anti-infection therapy .Methods The identification and drug sensitivity test of clinical isolates were carried out by using VITEK2 Compact system .Results The ratio of Enterococcus f aecium to Enterococcus f aecalis isolates was 1 .93 and it was increasing year by year .No vancomycin ,linezolid and tigecycline resistant Enterococcus f aecium and Enterococcus f aecalis i-solates was detected .The rates of Enterococcus f aecium sensitive to quinupristin-dalfopristin and tetracycline were higher than En-terococcus f aecalis(P<0 .05) ,and the rates of Enterococcus f aecium sensitive to nitrofurantoin ,ampicillin ,penicillin G ,moxifloxa-cin ,levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were lower than that of Enterococcus f aecalis(P<0 .05) .Conclusion The detection rates of En-terococcus was shifting to Enterococcus f aecium ,and the trends became obvious year after year .The drug sensitivity of Enterococcus f aecium and Enterococcus f aecalis is different ,and doctors should choose the proper therapy according to their specific drug resist-ance .At present ,vancomycin ,linezolid and tigecycline are preffered for the treatment against infection caused by Enterococcus f aeci-um and Enterococcus f aecalis .
3.Application value of MR diffusion weighted imaging of apparent diffusion coefficient in diagnosis of breast nodular lesions
Ping ZHU ; Yafei WANG ; Hao HUANG ; Qinfang LIU ; Yerong CHEN ; Xiuhong SHAN ; Jishan TAN
Chinese Journal of Radiology 2011;45(12):1117-1121
ObjectiveTo estimate the applications of ADC value and rADC value in the diagnosis of nodular lesions of breasts.Methods Fifty-two cases with 66 nodular lesions of breasts confirmed by histopathology underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Three b values (0,800 and 1000 s/mm2) were applied.The mean ADC values of the breast nodules,the ADC values of ipsilateral breast( rADC1 )and ADC values of contralateral breast (rADC2 )were respectively measured.The independent-samples t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical analyses.ResultsOf the 52 patients,there were 18 patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and 34 patients with fibroadenoma.50 patients with 64 lesions were examined by DWI.( 1 ) at b = 800 s/mm2,the mean ADC values of malignant nodules [ ( 1.01 ±0.09) × 10-3 mm2/s],rADC800-1 (0.52 ±0.07)and rADC800-2 (0.51 ±0.06) were lower than that of the benign nodules [ ADC value = ( 1.54 ± 0.28 ) × 10 -3 mm2/s,t = 8.217,P < 0.01 ; rADC800-1 =0.77 ±0.15,t =9.339,P<0.01 ; rADC800-2 =0.76 ±0.14,t = 10.394,P <0.01 ].The one-side upper limits of 95% medical reference value of mean values of infiltrating ductal carcinoma were adopted as the threshold point to distinguish the malignant from the benign.The threshold value of breast malignant nodule ADC,the rADC800-1 and rADC800-2 were respectively 1.05 × 10-3 mm2/s,0.55 and 0.53.The sensitivities of the three methods were 75.0%,65.0% and 60.0% ; the specificities were 100.0%,95.7% and 97.8% ;the positive predictive values were respectively 100.0%,86.7% and 92.3% ; the negative predictive values were 90.2%,86.3% and 84.9%; the diagnosis accordance rates were respectively 92.4%,86.4% and 86.4%.( 2 ) at b = 1000 s/mm2,the mean ADC values of malignant nodules [ ( 0.93 ± 0.08 ) ×10-3 mm2/s],rADC1000-1 (0.53 ±0.09) and rADC1000-2 (0.52 ±0.07) were also lower than that of the benign nodules[ ADC value= (1.45 ±0.28) ×10-3 mm2/s,t=11.844,P<0.01; rADC1000-1 =0.75 ±0.16,t=5.820,P < 0.01 ; rADC1000-2 = 0.74 ± 0.15,t = 8.082,P < 0.01 ].The threshold value points breast malignant nodule ADC,the rADC1000-1 and rADC1000-2 were respectively 0.97 × 10-3 mm2/s,0.58,0.55.The sensitivities were all 70.0% ; the specificities were respectively 100.0%,95.7% and 93.5% ;the positive predictive values were 100.0%,87.5% and 82.4% ; the negative predictive values were 88.5%,88.0% and 87.8% ; the diagnosis accordance rates were 90.9%,87.9% and 86.5% respectively.There were no significant differences in specificities and the diagnosis accordance rates ( x2 = 1.232,2.263 ; P =0.942,0.812 ).Conclusions ADC value and rADC value are both important parameters of MRI in differentiating benign and malignant breast diseases.The study indicated that ADC value ( at b =800 s/mm2) was the most valuable parameter.