1.Comparison of two rheumatoid arthritis models developed with different transplanting methods In severe combined immunodeficiency mice
Junfeng JIA ; Ping ZHU ; Zhanguo SHI ; Conghua WANG ; Tingting Lü ; Jinkang ZHAO ; Yun JIA ; Libing XIAO
Chinese Journal of Rheumatology 2008;12(9):588-590,插一
Objective To compare the pathological and serological difference of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) models in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice transplanted with synovial tissues from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (SCID-HuRAg mice) established either by renal capsule or subcutaneous back heterotopic transplantation. Methods RA synovium and normal human cartilage were co-implanted subcutaneously into the backs or under the renal capsule of 15 SCID mice. Engrafted tissues and serum were taken at the 4th and 8th week after transplantation. Histopathology and ELISA were performed to compare their histological and serological differences with RA. Results The morbidity and taken rate were significantly increased in the subcutaneous back of the mice group than the renal capsule group. The degree of cartilage erosion as well as the titers of serum IgM type rheumatoid factor suggested no significant difference between the two groups of SCID-HuRAg model devel oped by different engraft methods. Conclusion Back subcutaneous transplantation SCID-HuRAg model can be an ideal and stable animal model for studies on the pathogenesis and biotherapy of RA.
2.Multi-slice CT angiography in the diagnosis of lesions of mesenteric artery and mesenteric vein.
Jiangping XIE ; Weiqiang YAN ; Jinkang LIU ; Zhengming ZHOU ; Jinshan ZHAO ; Bin CHEN
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences) 2014;39(6):612-617
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the value of multi-slice CT angiography (MSCTA) in the diagnosis of super mesenteric artery (SMA) and super mesenteric vein (SMV), and discuss the 3D reconstruction method for detecting mesenteric vessel lesions.
METHODS:
Thirty-three patients suffering from mesenteric vessel diseases were analyzed. There were 14 SMA lesions, including 9 thromboses, 3 dissecting aneurysms, 1 pseudoaneurysm, and 1 malrotation. There were 19 SMV thromboses. The 3D reconstruction included volume rendering (VR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and multi-planner reformation (MPR).
RESULTS:
The lesions appeared clear by MSCTA in the 33 patients. The SMA thrombosis was shown clear in the MIP in all 9 patients, and only 4 of them were detected in the VR. There was significant difference between MIP andVR in detecting SMA thrombosis (P=0.0294). Three dissecting aneurysms were best shown in the MPR; 1 pseudoaneurysm and 1 malrotation were clearly manifested in the VR. The thrombosis of SMV was clearly shown by both MIP and MPR in all 19 patients. Collateral vessels were clearly shown in the MIP in 12 patients; the collateral vessels were detected by VR only in 5, and the other 7 failed to show the collateral vessels. There was significant difference between the MIP and the VR in showing lateral collateral vessels (P=0.0046).
CONCLUSION
Both lesions of SMA and SMV can be detected by MSCTA. MIP is an ideal reconstruction method for SMA thrombosis and collateral vessels around the SMV.
Aneurysm, Dissecting
;
diagnosis
;
Angiography
;
Humans
;
Mesenteric Arteries
;
pathology
;
Mesenteric Veins
;
pathology
;
Thrombosis
;
diagnosis
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed