Objective: To study the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on blood levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), high sensitivity C-reaction protein (hs-CRP) and fibrinogen (Fg) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Methods: Our research included 2 groups: AMI group,n=110 patients with PCI and Control group,n=53 healthy subjects from physical examination. Blood levels of VEGF, hs-CRP and Fg were compared between pre-operation and 30 min, 24 h, 72 h post-operation; the peak values of VEGF, hs-CRP and Fg were compared between the patients with post-operative MACE occurrence at 24 h and the patients without MACE occurrence.
Results:①Compared with Control group, blood levels of VEGF, hs-CRP and Fg in AMI group were increased at pre-operation and 30 min, 24 h, 72 h post-operation, for VEGF (pg/ml) as (84.7±21.4) vs (130.5±40.2) and (143.2±49.7), (107.1±31.8), (97.3±24.4); for hs-CRP (mg/L) as (1.03±0.34) vs (3.11±0.56) and (4.67±0.62), (6.42±0.72), (2.83±0.56); for Fg (mg/L) as (3.86±0.32) vs (4.79±0.52) and (5.02±0.54), (5.54±0.67), (4.11±0.44) respectively, allP<0.05. In AMI group, the post-operative value of VEGF was ifrst increased, it reached the peak at 30 min and then gradually decreasing; while hs-CRP and Fg were increased gradually, they reached the peak values at 24h time point, allP<0.05.②In AMI group, compared with the patients without post-operative MACE (72/110), the patients with MACE (38) had elevated 24h post-operative levels of VEGF as (131.7±36.5 vs 155.5±42.8), hs-CRP as (5.68±0.62 vs 6.89±0.53) and Fg as (5.23±0.60 vs 5.66±0.55) respectively, all P<0.01.
Conclusion: Post-operative monitoring of blood levels of VEGF, hs-CRP and Fg had the important clinical value in AMI patients after PCI.

BACKGROUND:Research on rough-surfaced implants has demonstrated similar survival rates for short and conventional-length implants. It is not clear whether ultrashort implant in limited alveolar bone of the posterior maxila can achieve good clinical results. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical effect of ultrashort implants in limited alveolar bone of the posterior maxila. METHODS:Eighteen patients with 21 ultrashort implants in limited alveolar bone of posterior maxila (the mean residual alveolar height=3.19 mm) were included in the study, including 10 males and 8 females, aged 25-68 years. At 12 months after restoration, the patients were detected with cone-beam CT to evaluate the osseointegration and marginal bone level around the implant. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Al the 18 patients completed the 12-month folow-up, and the 21 pieces of implants had good osseointegration. No soft tissue inflammation was found. At 12 months after restoration, the marginal bone height in the mesial and distal was (-0.21±0.78) mm and (-0.16±0.55) mm, respectively. Implant marginal bone changes in the mesial and distal had no statistical difference (P > 0.05). Ultrashort implants in limited alveolar bone of the posterior maxila can have good osseointegration, maintain the marginal bone mass around the implant, but stil need long-term clinical observation.

Objective : To explore the influence of apical dense bone islands on tooth movement during orthodontic treatment and its complications, and to provide a reference for orthodontic clinical treatment. Methods : This study obtained approval from the hospital ethics committee. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 33 patients with apical dense bone islands who received full-mouth fixed orthodontic treatment in the Orthodontics Department of Huizhou Stomatological Hospital from 2018 to 2022. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) was used to determine the location, distribution, and wrapping severity of the apical dense bone islands before treatment. The number of loose teeth located in the apical dense bone islands and the degree of external apical root resorption in the apical area of teeth were analyzed before treatment, immediately after treatment, and 12 months after treatment. Results: There were 33 orthodontic patients (aged 11 to 42 years, with an average age of 16.7 years and a median age of 15 years) included in this study, including 12 males (36.4%) and 21 females (63.6%). All apical dense bone islands involved a single tooth located in the mandible, mainly in the premolar-molar area. No gender differences were present in the location of the dense bone islands (P>0.05). The apical dense bone islands were mildly wrapped in 23 cases (69.7%), moderately wrapped in 10 cases (30.3%), and severely wrapped in no cases. No difficulty in tooth movement or incomplete closure of extraction space was found in the apical dense bone islands with different degrees of wrapping during orthodontic treatment. For teeth located in apical dense bone islands, 1 patient (3.0%) had loose teeth before treatment, 6 patients (18.2%) had loose teeth after treatment, and 2 patients (6.1%) had loose teeth 12 months after treatment. The number of patients with grade I loose teeth increased after treatment and 12 months after treatment. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of loose teeth before and after treatment (P<0.05), no statistically significant difference in the number of loose teeth before treatment and 12 months after treatment (P>0.05), and no statistically significant difference in the number of loose teeth after treatment and 12 months after treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, apical dense bone islands showed mild resorption in 26 cases (78.8%), moderate resorption in 7 cases (21.2%), and severe resorption in no cases. The apical dense bone islands showed mild resorption in 25 cases (75.8%), moderate resorption in 8 cases (24.2%), and severe resorption in no cases 12 months after treatment. For the severity of root resorption, there was a statistically significant difference between before and after treatment (P<0.05) as well as between before treatment and 12 months after treatment (P<0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between after treatment and 12 months after treatment (P>0.05). Conclusion Apical dense bone islands were not found to affect tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. After orthodontic treatment, the number of loose teeth increased and mild-to-moderate tooth external apical root resorption occurred, which may be a potential risk of external apical root resorption. Thus, it is recommended to pay close attention during the orthodontic process.