1.Comparison of 23G and 20G vitrectomy for treatment of infectious endophthalmitis
Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases 2012;28(3):249-253
ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes and safety of 23G and 20G vitrectomy for treatment of infectious endophthalmitis.MethodsThis was a retrospective case study.Sixty-seven eyes of 67 eyes suffering from infectious endophthalmitis with a history of trauma or intraocular operation history were enrolled in this study.They were diagnosed by the examinations of best corrected visual acuity,intraocular pressures,slit lamp microscope,indirect ophthalmoscopy,B-scan ultrasound and CT.There were 49 males (49 eyes) and 18 females (18 eyes).The patients aged from 18 to 72 years with a mean age of (43±13)years.There were 60 patients (60 eyes) with a history of trauma,7 patients (7 eyes) with intraocular operation history.The patients were enrolled into 20G vitrectomy group (35 patients,35 eyes) before December,2009 and 23G vitrectomy group (32 patients,32 eyes) after January,2010 when 23G vitrectomy system was imported in this hospital.Vitreous purulence was taken in all patients at the beginning of the surgery for bacteria and fungal culture and drug sensitivity test. A standard vitrectomy with artificial posterior vitreous detachment followed by internal limiting membrane peeling,and (or) intraocular laser photocoagulation,cryocoagulation,fluid-air exchange with intraocular silicone oil or gas tamponade were performed in all eases.Broad-spectrum antibiotics and glucocorticoids were used systematically for one week after surgery,but glucocorticoids were not used for fungal infections.The follow-up was ranged from two to nine months with a mean of (7 ± 1) months.The surgical time,inflammation situation,visual acuity,intraocular pressure, retinal reattachment rare,iatrogenic retinal hole rate, bulbar conjunctiva scar formation rate,reoperation rate and eye retention situation before and after surgery were comparatively analyzed.ResultsThe mean surgical times were (126 ± 12) and (89 ± 12) minutes in 20G and 23G group,which was significantly different (t=3.125,P<0.05).The major surgery complications were ora serrata dialysis and other iatrogenic retinal breaks,and were occurred in 34 eyes,including 30 eyes (85.71%) in 20G group and 4 eyes (12.50%) in 23G group (x2 =35.85,P<0.05).These 4 eyes in 23G group received foreign body removal surgery previously.The inflammation was controlled in 65 eyes (97.01%) including 34 eyes (97.14%) and 31 eyes (96.88%) in 20G and 23G group respectively,which was not significantly different (x2=0.004,P>0.05).At last follow-up,There was no statistical difference of visual acuity between the two groups (t=3.12,P>0.05).Fourteen eyes underwent silicone oil tamponade including 13eyes (37.14%) and 1 eye (3.13%) in 20G and 23G group respectively,which was significantly different (x2=11.703,P<0.05).Nine eyes underwent reoperation (13.43%),including 8 eyes (22.86%) and 1eye (3.13%) in 20G and 23G group respectively,which was significantly different (x2=5.597,P<0.05).The 8 re-operated eyes in 20G group included 1 eye of recurrent endophthalmitis and 7 eyes with retinal detachment,the 1 re-operated eye in 23G group was of recurrent endophthalmitis.There was significantly different (x2=7.147,P<0.05) for the rate of retinal detachment between the 2 groups.There were 40eyes with bulbar conjunctiva scar including 35 eyes (100.00%) and five eyes (15.63%) in 20G and 23G group.Conclusion 23G vitrectomy is an effective treatment for infectious endophthalmitis with shorter surgery time,lower reoperation rate,lower retinal reattachment rate and fewer bulbar conjunctiva scar.
2.Management and outcomes of gastric leak after sleeve gastrectomy: results from the 2010-2020 national registry.
Mengyi LI ; Na ZENG ; Yang LIU ; Xitai SUN ; Wah YANG ; Yanjun LIU ; Zhongqi MAO ; Qiyuan YAO ; Xiangwen ZHAO ; Hui LIANG ; Wenhui LOU ; Chiye MA ; Jinghai SONG ; Jianlin WU ; Wei YANG ; Pin ZHANG ; Liyong ZHU ; Peirong TIAN ; Peng ZHANG ; Zhongtao ZHANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2023;136(16):1967-1976
BACKGROUND:
Management of gastric leak after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is challenging due to its unpredictable outcomes. We aimed to summarize the characteristics of SG leaks and analyze interventions and corresponding outcomes in a real-world setting.
METHODS:
To retrospectively review of 15,721 SG procedures from 2010 to 2020 based on a national registry. A cumulative sum analysis was used to identify a fitting curve of gastric leak rate. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were performed to calculate and compare the probabilities of relevant outcomes. The logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of acute leaks.
RESULTS:
A total of 78 cases of SG leaks were collected with an incidence of 0.5% (78/15,721) from this registry (6 patients who had the primary SG in non-participating centers). After accumulating 260 cases in a bariatric surgery center, the leak rate decreased to a stably low value of under 1.17%. The significant differences presented in sex, waist circumference, and the proportion of hypoproteinemia and type 2 diabetes at baseline between patients with SG leak and the whole registry population ( P = 0.005, = 0.026, <0.001, and = 0.001, respectively). Moreover, 83.1% (59/71) of the leakage was near the esophagogastric junction region. Leakage healed in 64 (88.9%, 64/72) patients. The median healing time of acute and non-acute leaks was 5.93 months and 8.12 months, respectively. Acute leak (38/72, 52.8%) was the predominant type with a cumulative reoperation rate >50%, whereas the cumulative healing probability in the patients who required surgical treatment was significantly lower than those requring non-surgical treatment ( P = 0.013). Precise dissection in the His angle area was independently associated with a lower acute leak rate, whereas preservation ≥2 cm distance from the His angle area was an independent risk factor.
CONCLUSIONS
Male sex, elevated waist circumference, hypoproteinaemia, and type 2 diabetes are risk factors of gastric leaks after SG. Optimizing surgical techniques, including precise dissection of His angle area and preservation of smaller gastric fundus, should be suggested to prevent acute leaks.
Humans
;
Male
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications*
;
Obesity, Morbid
;
Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology*
;
Gastrectomy/methods*
;
Reoperation/methods*
;
Registries
;
Laparoscopy/methods*
;
Treatment Outcome