1.EFFECTS OF SYSTEMIC POISONING BY SULPHUR MUSTARD ON CELL DNA BIOSYNTHESIS OF INTERNAL ORGANS AND PROTECTIVE ACTION OF ANTIDOTES IN MICE
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University 1985;0(05):-
In this study, we observed the efTects of systemic poisoning by sulphur mustard (SM) on DNA biosynthesis of internal organs and protective action of antidotes in mice.The results showed that the systemic poisoning by SM produced a strong depression of [3H]-TdR incorporation into DNA biosynthesis, which was characterized by rapidity, severity and rapid recovery.It is suggested that mammal an organism has a marked physiological compensation, regeneration and repair activity for DNA damage.Antidote sodium thiosufate alone or in combination with unithiol (DMPS) has satisfactory protective effects on depression of DNA biosynthesis in mice poisoned by SM.
2.Preparation and Characteristic of Monoclonal Antibodies against Tetrodotoxin
Xiaofei MIAO ; Jingbo GAO ; Jiejun SONG
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University 1985;0(06):-
0.05). (4) The result of detoxincation in- vivo was not as good as that of antiserum.
3.Results of randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase III trial of rh-endostatin (YH-16) in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Jinwan WANG ; Yan SUN ; Yongyu LIU ; Qitao YU ; Yiping ZHANG ; Kai LI ; Yunzhong ZHU ; Qinghua ZHOU ; Mei HOU ; Zhongzhen GUAN ; Weilian LI ; Wu ZHUANG ; Donglin WANG ; Houjie LIANG ; Fengzhan QIN ; Huishan LU ; Xiaoqing LIU ; Hong SUN ; Yanjun ZHANG ; Jiejun WANG ; Suxia LUO ; Ruihe YANG ; Yuanrong TU ; Xiuwen WANG ; Shuping SONG ; Jingmin ZHOU ; Lifen YOU ; Jing WANG ; Chen YAO
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2005;8(4):283-290
BACKGROUNDEndostar™ (rh-endostatin, YH-16) is a new recombinant human endostatin developed by Medgenn Bioengineering Co. Ltd., Yantai, Shandong, P.R.China. Pre-clinical study indicated that YH-16 could inhibit tumor endothelial cell proliferation, angiogenesis and tumor growth. Phase I and phase II studies revealed that YH-16 was effective as single agent with good tolerance in clinical use.The current study was to compare the response rate , median ti me to progression (TTP) ,clinical benefit andsafety in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) , who were treated with YH-16 plus vi-norelbine and cisplatin (NP) or placebo plus NP.
METHODSFour hundred and ninety-three histologically or cy-tologically confirmed stage IIIB and IV NSCLC patients , withlife expectancy > 3 months and ECOG perform-ance status 0-2 , were enrolledin a randomized ,double-blind ,placebo-controlled , multicenter trial ,either trialgroup : NP plus YH-16 (vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on day 1 and day 5 ,cisplatin 30mg/m² on days 2 to 4 , YH-167.5mg/m² on days 1 to 14) or control group : NP plus placebo (vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on day 1 and day 5 ,cis-platin 30 mg/m² on days 2 to 4 ,0.9% sodium-chloride 3 .75 ml on days 1 to 14) every 3 weeks for 2-6 cycles .The trial endpoints included response rate ,clinical benefit rate ,time to progression,quality of life and safety .
RESULTSOf 486 assessable patients , overall response rate was 35.4% in trial group and 19.5% in controlgroup (P=0 .0003) . The median TTP was 6 .3 months and 3 .6 months for trial group and control group respectively (P < 0 .001) . The clinical benefit rate was 73 .3 %in trial group and 64.0% in control group (P=0 .035) .In untreated patients of trial group and control group ,the response rate was 40 .0% and 23.9%(P=0 .003) ,the clinical benefit rate was 76 .5 % and 65 .0 % (P=0 .023) ,the median TTP was 6 .6 and 3 .7months (P=0 .0000) ,respectively .In pretreated patients of trial group and control group ,the response ratewas 23.9% and 8.5%(P=0 .034) ,the clinical benefit rate was 65.2% and 61.7%(P=0 .68) ,the median TTP was 5 .7 and 3 .2 months (P=0 .0002) ,respectively . The relief rate of clinical symptoms in trial groupwas higher than that of those in control group ,but no significance existed (P > 0 .05) . The score of quality oflife in trial group was significantly higher than that in control group (P=0 .0155) after treatment . There were no significant differences in incidence of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity , moderate and severe sideeffects betweentrial group and control group .
CONCLUSIONSThe addition of YH-16 to NP regimen results in significantly and clinically meaningful improvement in response rate , median time to tumor progression,and clinical benefit rate compared with NP alone in advanced NSCLC patients . YH-16 in combination with chemotherapy shows a synergic activity and a favorable toxic profile in advanced cancer patients .
4.External apical root resorption in orthodontic tooth movement: the risk factors and clinical suggestions from experts' consensus.
Huang LI ; Xiuping WU ; Lan HUANG ; Xiaomei XU ; Na KANG ; Xianglong HAN ; Yu LI ; Ning ZHAO ; Lingyong JIANG ; Xianju XIE ; Jie GUO ; Zhihua LI ; Shuixue MO ; Chufeng LIU ; Jiangtian HU ; Jiejun SHI ; Meng CAO ; Wei HU ; Yang CAO ; Jinlin SONG ; Xuna TANG ; Ding BAI
West China Journal of Stomatology 2022;40(6):629-637
External apical root resorption is among the most common risks of orthodontic treatment, and it cannot be completely avoided and predicted. Risk factors causing orthodontic root resorption can generally be divided into patient- and treatment-related factors. Root resorption that occurs during orthodontic treatment is usually detected by radiographical examination. Mild or moderate root absorption usually does no obvious harm, but close attention is required. When severe root resorption occurs, it is generally recommended to suspend the treatment for 3 months for the cementum to be restored. To unify the risk factors of orthodontic root resorption and its clinical suggestions, we summarized the theoretical knowledge and clinical experience of more than 20 authoritative experts in orthodontics and related fields in China. After discussion and summarization, this consensus was made to provide reference for orthodontic clinical practice.
Humans
;
Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects*
;
Root Resorption/etiology*
;
Consensus
;
Dental Cementum
;
Risk Factors