Objective To compare the diagnostic value of magnifying chromoendoscopy with probebased confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) for differentiation of neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps. Methods A total of 16 consecutive patients, who were diagnosed as having polyps with endoscopy between December 2009 and January 2010 at Nanfang Hospital, were included in this study. The pit pattern of the polyp was first determined with magnifying chromoendoscopy in all patients. Then, confocal images of the polyps were recorded and subsequently analyzed offline. Using pathological diagnosis as golden standard,the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods were compared. Results A total of 26 polyps from 16 patients were found. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of magnifying chromoendoscopy was 94. 1%, 77.8%, 88. 8%, 87. 5% and 88.4%, respectively,while those of pCLE were 100. 0%, 88. 8%, 94. 4% ,100. 0% and 96. 1%, respectively. There was no significant difference between pCLE and magnifying chromoendoscopy. Conclusion In differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions, pCLE shows higher sensitivity and specificity than does magnifying chromoendoscopy, although without significant difference. pCLE can be used as a new real time method to determine the property of colorectal polyps.

ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of transgastic peritoneoscopy for ascites of unknown aetiology.MethodsTransgastric peritoneoscopy was performed on 7 patients with ascites of unknown aetiology.Diagnosis and complications were both recorded.ResultsDiagnosis of all the 7 patients were confirmed after transgastric peritoneoscopy,among whom 6 ( 85.7％ ) were found to have tuberculosis peritonitis,and 1 ( 14.3％ ) with liver disease.All patients recovered after the operation.No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred.ConclusionTransgastric peritoneoscopy is a valuable diagnostic method for ascites of unknown aetiology.

Objective To assess the feasibility of gastroscopy training with AccuTouch(R) Endoscopy Simulator for novice endoscopists. Methods The novice endoscopists ( n = 8 ) were divided into 2 groups to receive training with the simulator ( group A, n = 4) or with traditional method ( group B, n = 4). After the training, we compared the success rate of independent performance, success rate with aids and failure rate for the first 10 cases between 2 groups. Results There were no significant differences between 2 groups in terms of age, gender, educational background and experience of practice. The group A showed higher independent success rate and success rate with aids, and lower failure rate. Conclusion The simulator, decreasing the learning fees and improving learning efficiency, is applicable to endoscopist training.

Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for preoperative endoscopic assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal laterally spreading tumour(LST).Methods Data of 104 cases of colorectal LST were included.With the final pathological diagnosis as the golden standard,the accuracies of MCE and EUS for preoperative assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal LST were compared.Results The diagnostic accuracies of MCE and EUS for evaluating the invasion depth of LST were 89.4％ (93/104) and 73.1％ (76/104),respectively(P＜0.05).The lesion size and the endoscopist could affect the accuracy of the EUS evaluation (P=0.017,OR=3.561;P=0.035,OR =1.399).The accuracy of EUS seemed to show a downward trend for colorectal LST of larger diameters.Conclusion Both MCE and EUS are effective for evaluating the invasion depth of colorectal LST,but the accuracy of MCE may be higher than that of EUS.Large diameter of the lesion and the doctor's experience inadequacy may be the risk factors for the accuracy of EUS.