[Abstrct] Objective To compare the short -term tumor response and adverse events of two chemoradio-therapy regimens for locally advanced non -squamous non-small cell lung cancer .Methods From March 2009 to January 2013 ,we recruited 42 patients with stage ⅢNSCLC who had received three -dimensional intensity -modulated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy .group A treated with radiotherapy combined pemetrexed plus cisplatin and group B treated with radiotherapy combined docetaxel plus cisplatin .We compared the short -term tumor response and adverse events between the two regimens .Results There were 28 cases in group A and 14 cases in group B .There were no significant differences between the two groups in hematologic toxicities ,such as leukopenia,neutropenia,anemia and thrombocytopenia.In non-hematologic toxicities,radiation pneumonitis and cough were no significances respectively (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in other non -he-matologic toxicities,such as liver dysfunction,renal dysfunction,fever,dyspnea,radiation esophagitis,hypody-namia,weight loss,gastrointestinal reactions and skin reactions .The response rate displayed no differences be-tween two groups .Conclusion This study reveals Pemetrexed plus cisplatin group had less non -hematologic toxicities than Docetaxel plus cisplatin group in locally advanced non -squamous non -small cell lung cancer . But there are no differences in the short -term tumor response between the two regimens .

Objective To discuss the maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin based on 5-fluorouracil derivative in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Methods From Mar 2015 to Oct 2015,15 locally advanced rectal cancer patients (T3,T4/N +) who received intensity modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin were enrolled in this study.The prescription dose was 50.6 Gy for gross tumor volume(GTV) and 41.8 Gy for clinical tumor volume(CTV) in 22 fractions within 30 d with concomitant boost.There were four dose-level groups of oxaliplatin as 100,110,120 and 130 mg/m2 tri-weekly and fixed capecitabine dose (825 mg/m2 bid d1-5 per week).The first 12 patients were randomly assigned into 4 groups.For the 130 mg/m3 group,another 3 patients were enrolled because of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).Treatment related toxicities and response rates were evaluated.Results The most common adverse events(AE) were radiation enteritis,skin reactions,nausea,fatigue,urinary system AE and bone marrow suppression.There was a trend of increase by the dose level of oxaliplatin for toxicities.Groups 100,110 and 120 mg/m2 had none DLT,while group 130 mg/m2 had 1 patient for grade 3 thrombopenia and 1 patient for grade 3 nausea.Postoperative pathology showed that all patients achieved tumor downstaging,among which 0,1,2,3 cases achieved complete remission of the four groups,respectively.Conclusions The combination regimen of capecitabine and oxaliplatin is safe and effective according to the preliminary results.The maximum tolerated dose of oxaliplatin was 130 mg/m2 tri-weekly.

Objective To investigate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Methods A total of 19 patients with ASCC who underwent definitive radiotherapy in our hospital since 2011 were collected.The survival curves were depicted with K-M method.Risk factors of disease progression were analyzed using case-control study.Results The median follow-up time was 31 months.The 3 year-LFS and 3 year-OS were 88.1％ and 91.7％,respectively.Grade 3 acute toxicities during the chemoradiotherapy were mainly white blood cell reduction (15.8％),platelet reduction (10.5％),diarrhea (15.8％),and skin reaction (31.6％).Compared with historical data,volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy was superior to conventional radiotherapy in the treatment outcome and normal tissue protection in ASCC.Univariate analysis showed that concurrent chemotherapy with capecitabine was a favorable factor in disease progression (P＜ 0.05).Conclusions Volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy for ASCC may have advantages in terms of efficacy and normal tissue protection.Concurrent chemotherapy with a double-drug regimen containing capecitabine may be a beneficial factor in disease progression.

Objective To explore the value of MRI simulation in the pre-operative radiotherapy for locally advanced low rectal carcinoma.Methods A total of 40 patients diagnosed with locally advanced low rectal carcinoma by endoscopic biopsy and radiological staging examinations were included in this study.There were 22 male and 18 female with nedian age 58 years (range 31-80).Patients underwent CT and MRI simulation scanning in the same position and fixing device.GTV under CT images and MRI inages were delineated respectively by two experienced radiologists.Primary tumor length,tumor volume and distance of distal tumor from the anal verge were calculated by treatment planning system(TPS).The two groups of data were compared.Results The distance of distal tumor to the anal verge were all no more than 5 cm on digital examination.The mean length of GTVcT was remarkably longer than that of GTVMRI [(5.21 ±1.65) cm vs.(4.46 ± 1.51) cm,t =5.059,P ＜0.05].The mean volume of GTVcTWaS significantly larger than that of GTVMRI[(55.71 ±31.57) cm3vs.(44.02 ±25.11) cm3,t=6.977,P＜ 0.05)].The mean distance of distal tumor to the anal verge was (3.72 ± 0.93) cm,significantly longer than that of lower bounds of GTVCT to the anal verge,which had a high consistency with GTVMRI.The IMRT plan was based on CT-MRI fusion images.There were no 3-4 grade adverse effects of radiotherapy.The overall pCR rate was 32.5％.Conclusions MRI simulation could define smaller GTV and more precise lower bounds than CT.With improved accuracy of target volumes contours,the application of MRI simulation may promote the efficacy of radiotherapy and result in a reduction in the incidence of toxicities.

Objective:To explore the prognostic factors associated with clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCAC) of the uterine cervix based on data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.Methods:Clinical data were collected from 431 patients with confirmed CCAC in the SEER database from 1976 to 2017. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test for comparison between subgroups. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the influencing factors of overall survival (OS).Results:The median age [ M ( Q1, Q3)] of 431 patients was 54 years old (40 years old, 71 years old); there were 333 cases (77.3%) of whit. The median OS time of 431 patients was 93 months (95% CI: 47-148 months), and the 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 80.1%, 65.8% and 54.2%, respectively. The median OS time was not reached in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage Ⅰ, 83 months (95% CI: 21-144 months) for stage Ⅱ, 32 months (95% CI: 16-47 months) for stage Ⅲ, and 9 months (95% CI: 5-13 months) for stage Ⅳ ( P < 0.001). Median OS time was not reached in patients with SEER stage of localized lesions, 46 months (95% CI: 8-83 months) for regional lesions stage, and 9 months (95% CI: 5-12 months) for distant metastases stage ( P < 0.001). Of the patients with clear AJCC staging and some with unspecified AJCC staging, 118 received surgical treatment alone and 119 received postoperative radiotherapy, the median OS time of the two groups was 443 months (95% CI: 162-723 months) and 102 months (95% CI: 75-129 months), and the difference in OS between the two groups was statistically significant ( P < 0.001). Among the patients with AJCC stage Ⅰ, the 5-year OS rates in surgery-only group and postoperative radiotherapy group were 82.5% and 78.5%, the stage Ⅱ were 80.0% and 52.3%, and the stage Ⅲ were 27.8% and 63.3%, respectively; the differences in OS between different stages were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Among the patients with SEER localized lesions stage, the 5-year OS rates in surgery-only group and postoperative radiotherapy group were 88.9% and 73.1%, and the difference was statistically significant ( P = 0.012); the regional lesions stage were 45.5% and 60.0%, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P = 0.568). The results of multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that AJCC staging (stage Ⅰ vs. stage Ⅳ, HR = 0.281, 95% CI: 0.178-0.543, P < 0.001; stage Ⅱ vs. stage Ⅳ, HR = 0.347, 95% CI: 0.113-0.439, P < 0.001; stage Ⅲ vs. stage Ⅳ, HR = 0.399, 95% CI: 0.030-0.145, P < 0.001), SEER staging (localized lesions stage vs. distant metastases stage, HR = 0.104, 95% CI: 0.059-0.182, P < 0.001; regional lesions stage vs. distant metastases stage, HR = 0.301, 95% CI: 0.195-0.463, P < 0.001) and whether or not receive surgery (yes vs. no, HR = 0.359, 95% CI: 0.241-0.535, P < 0.001) were independent influencing factors of OS in CCAC patients. Conclusions:AJCC staging, SEER staging and surgery are independent influence factors for OS in patients with CCAC, and postoperative radiotherapy may not provide more survival benefit.

Microscopic extension (subclinical lesion) is the key factor for defining clinical target volume in radiotherapy. In this article, the research progresses on microscopic extension or extracapsular extension in esophageal cancer, lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, rectal cancer, breast cancer, non-melanoma skin cancer and metastatic lymph nodes were reviewed. These results provide important basis for the definition of clinical target volume. However, a series of questions remain to be properly resolved.

Objective:To analyze the effectiveness and safety of the second course radiotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.Methods:We retrospectively collected the data of 28 patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases who received the second course radiotherapy at Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute from 2017 to 2023, to analyze the feasibility of re-irradiation.Results:For the 28 patients, the median follow-up time after re-irradiation was 20.2 months. The median time interval between the first- and second-course radiotherapy was 11.1 months. The median biologically effective doses of the first- and second-course radiotherapy were 100 Gy and 96 Gy, respectively. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was administered to 25 patients (89.3%) during the first course and 24 patients (85.7%) during the second course of radiotherapy. The mean equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions to the normal liver was 10.1 Gy in the first-course radiotherapy and 7.9 Gy in the second-course radiotherapy. The complete response rate, partial response rate, and objective response rate after re-irradiation were 54.5%, 18.2%, and 72.7%, respectively. After re-irradiation, the 2-year cumulative local failure rate was 17.0% when calculated based on patients and 15.1% when calculated based on lesions, the 1-year progression-free survival rate was 27.4%, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 46.7%. The second-course radiotherapy was well tolerated, with most patients (75.0%) experiencing grade 1-2 acute adverse reactions and only one case (3.6%) experiencing grade 3 acute adverse events.Conclusions:Second course radiotherapy is an effective and safe treatment approach for selected patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.