BACKGROUND:Mouse nerve growth factor can promote the repair and regeneration of injured nerves, but current experimental research shows that the effects of different treatment methods are stil controversial.
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the effect of mouse nerve growth factor injection via different ways on the treatment of peripheral nerve injury.
METHODS:Total y 52 patients with peripheral nerve injury were randomly assigned into two groups:experimental group (local injection of mouse nerve growth factor, n=27) and control group (systemic administration of mouse nerve growth factor, n=25). The treatment was performed once a day, and lasted for 4 weeks. Then, the clinical efficacy and recovery of neurological function were compared.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The good and effective rates were 85%(n=23) and 93%(n=25) in the experimental group, while 72%(n=18) and 84%(n=21) in the control group, respectively, which were significantly better in the experimental group than the control group (P<0.05). In the experimental group, 13 cases developed transient pain at injection site, including one case of remission undergoing oral analgesics;in the control group, 12 cases had transient pain at injection site, without any treatment. The results suggest that both local and total body injection of mouse nerve growth factor are safe and effective for treatment of peripheral nerve injury, but local injection is superior to systemic administration.

Objective To investigate the voicing acoustic characteristics of sulcus vocalis patients with mini-mum glottal area(MGA) .Methods 60 normal subjects (30 male ,30 female) ,and 62 subjects with sulcus vocalis (33 male and 29 female)were recruited .They all had stroboscopic laryngoscopy ,and had MGA measured when say-ing /i:/using software supporting KIPS .The acoustic parameters consisted of vocal cord fundamental frequency (F0) ,jitter and shimmer ,normalized noise energy ( NNE) ,harmony to noise ratio (HNR) and signal noise ratio (SNR) ,maximum phonation time(MPT) and respectively make correlation analysis with voice MGA .Results The voicing MGA of male patients with sulcus vocalis was 434 .74 ± 112 .83 ,larger than the males with normal vocalis 298 .25 ± 93 .63 .This was statistically significant (P<0 .05) .The voicing MGA of females with sulcus vocalis was (484 .75 ± 143 .91) ,significantly larger than those of females with normal vocalis (293 .43 ± 93 .73) and the differ-ence was statistically significant (P<0 .05) .The voicing MGA on both males and females with sulcus vocalis was noticeably relation to the F0 (r=0 .972 ,P<0 .05) and (r=0 .928 ,P<0 .05) ,Jitter (r=0 .978 ,P<0 .05) and (r=0 .910 ,P<0 .910) and Shimmer (r=0 .973 ,P<0 .05) and (r=0 .921 ,P<0 .05) ,normalized noise energy(r=0 .883 ,P<0 .05) and (r=0 .960 ,P<0 .05) ;and negative relation to the signal noise ratio (r= -0 .947 ,P<0 .05) and (r = -0 .957 ,P<0 .05) ,signal noise ratio (r= -0 .959 ,P<0 .05) and (r= -0 .944 ,P<0 .05) ,max-imum phonation time (r= -0 .891 ,P<0 .05) and (r= -0 .936 ,P<0 .05) .Conclusion Patients with pathological sulcus vocalis have glottal areas larger than normal .Acoustic analysis of the voices of the sulcus vocalis can be used as an objective laboratory examination .