Objective To Study the criteria of assessment on the degree of mental damage due to in-jury. Methods A retrospective study of 297 mental damage cases caused by injury expertised by the depart-ment of legal psychiatry of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from July 1986 to December 2002 was conducted. Results In 297 cases, 91 were heavily injury, 93 were moder-ate. 44 cases were slight injury, and 69 cases between injury and disease. Conclusion The Study proposed a concrete and practical assessment criteria of forensic expertise of mental damage by the analysis of these 297 cases. We hope this criteria is developed into perfection in future forensic expertise.

Orthopedic joint replacement patients include a significant proportion of elderly individuals.Due to the physiological characteristics of the elderly,the incidence of patient harm during the diagnosis and treatment process is relatively high.Consequently,orthopedic joint replacement is also an area with a high rate of medical disputes in both domestic and international healthcare.The courts often hold the medical side more responsible in their judgments of such disputes.A retrospective analysis of 24 cases of orthopedic joint replacement dispute judgments was conducted to explore and summarize the causes of these cases,and to propose corresponding countermeasures and suggestions with the aim of reducing the incidence of such medical disputes.

This paper analyzed the legal issues existing on the medical side in 20 medical damage cases in obstetrics from January 2020 to June 2022 in China Judgment Documents Network， and hoped to explore the paths that the medical side can use for reference in building a harmonious doctor-patient relationship in the legal context. Firstly， medical institutions should establish rescue evaluation systems and early warning mechanisms for critical pregnancy and maternal， so as to ensure the health and safety of life of pregnant women and newborns， as well as prevent the occurrence of adverse obstetric events. Secondly， strengthening the cultivation of the humanistic quality among obstetric medical practitioners is the basis of the harmonious obstetrical doctor-patient relationship. Thirdly， the training and learning of relevant laws and regulations such as the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China and the Physician Law of the People’s Republic of China should be strengthened. Fourthly， the patients’ informed consent should be respected， the process and procedures of fulfilling informed consent should be standardized by the systems， and the forms for fulfilling informed consent should be further explored. Fifthly， the medical risk-sharing mechanism should be explored and this paper suggested that postpartum women purchase obstetric accident insurance to reasonably share medical risks. Sixthly， medical social workers should be introduced， doctor-patient communication should be strengthened， and the obstetric risk awareness of the whole society should be enhanced.