1.Telerehabilitation for speech-language pathology in community-based rehabilitation in the Philippines: A feasibility study.
Joyce Anne Ponciano-Villafania ; Ellary Grace Odtuhan ; Carmela Tria ; Jowillyn Capacite ; Mykel Francesco Dequiñ ; a ; Jelynna Noreen Alano ; Beatrice Colleen Cajucom
Philippine Journal of Allied Health Sciences 2022;5(2):7-16
BACKGROUND:
Filipino speech-language pathologists (SLPs) can reach more persons with disabilities across 7,107 Philippine islands through
telerehabilitation (also known as teletherapy, telepractice). This study described the feasibility of telerehabilitation for speech-language pathology
in community-based rehabilitation in terms of appropriate information and communication technologies (ICT), stakeholder perspectives, and
facilitators and barriers.
METHODS:
A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Participants were purposely selected as telerehabilitation
stakeholders. One metropolitan-based SLP conducted remote and synchronous therapy sessions to two persons with voice disorders (52 and 65
years old) in their homes, assisted by one primary caregiver each and one community-based rehabilitation worker (CBRW). ICT observations were
logged as field notes. Stakeholder perspectives were obtained through participant journals and interviews, thematically analyzed using NVIVO, and
validated by participants. Facilitators and barriers were derived from data triangulation of field notes, journals, and interviews.
RESULTS:
The best
ICT comprised of fastest wireless internet available (7.2 Mbps), MacBook™ laptop, and FaceTime™ videoconferencing application. Stakeholders had
varied yet positive perspectives. The SLP focused on ICT requirements and intervention conduct. The families saw telerehabilitation benefits of
cost-effectiveness and intervention effectiveness. Both SLP and the families were satisfied as telerehabilitation providers and consumers. CBRW
appreciated intervention effectivity. The only barrier to telerehabilitation was low internet bandwidth. Facilitators to telerehabilitation were
stronger CBR policies and SLP capacity development.
CONCLUSION
Telerehabilitation is feasible in speech-language pathology within communitybased rehabilitation in the Philippines, given community-appropriate ICT and positive experiences of stakeholders. It can flourish with faster
internet, stronger community health policies, and empowering stakeholders.
Telerehabilitation