1.Comparison of Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on Short-Term Outcomes.
Xue-Yong ZHENG ; Yu PAN ; Ke CHEN ; Jia-Qi GAO ; Xiu-Jun CAI
Chinese Medical Journal 2018;131(6):713-720
Background:Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is increasingly performed in patients with gastric cancer. However, the usage of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (IEJ) following LTG is limited, as the safety and efficacy remain unclear. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of IEJ following LTG.
Methods:Studies published from January 1994 to January 2017 comparing the outcomes of IEJ and extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EEJ) following LTG were reviewed and collected from the PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI). Operative results, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the Review Manager 5.3.
Results:Seven nonrandomized studies with 785 patients were included. Compared with EEJ, IEJ has less blood loss (WMD: -13.52 ml; 95% CI: -24.82--2.22; P = 0.02), earlier time to first oral intake (WMD: -0.49 day; 95% CI: -0.83--0.14; P < 0.01), and shorter length of hospitalization (WMD: -0.62 day; 95% CI: -1.08--0.16; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between IEJ and EEJ regarding the operation time, anastomotic time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, time to first flatus, anastomosis leakage rate, anastomosis stenosis rate, and proximal resections (all P > 0.05).
ConclusionsCompared with EEJ, IEJ has better cosmesis, milder surgical trauma, and a faster postoperative recovery. IEJ can be performed as safely as EEJ. IEJ should be encouraged to surgeons with sufficient expertise.
Esophagostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Esophagus ; surgery ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Jejunostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome
2.The effects of cholecystojejunostomy and biliary drainage on biliary motor.
Qichang, ZHENG ; Yanglong, CHEN
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) 2002;22(2):144-7
Simulating physiological neuronal and hormonal conditions during digestive and interdigestive periods, the study identified the changes of the motility of biliary system including bile duct and sphincter of Oddi (SO) before and after cholecystojejunostomy. Thirty-five rabbits were divided into five groups randomly. The experimental groups received the venous injection of CCK 10 ng/kg, erythromycin 10 mg/kg, atropine 3 micrograms/kg and L-NAME 10 mg/kg respectively. Each rabbit underwent manometry through introducing a three-lumen catheter via the papilla retrogradely, using the low-compliance papillary infusion system. Then the gallbladder and the upper segment of the jejunum was anastomosed and the manometric procedures repeated after one week. SO basal pressure was increased, contraction amplitude decreased, contraction time shortened after cholecystojejunostomy. L-NAME, CCK and erythromycin could all excite SO. L-NAME could increase basal pressure and contraction amplitude, CCK increase basal pressure contraction amplitude and frequency, and erythromycin increase contraction amplitude, respectively. But comparing with that before cholecystojejunostomy, the increasing extent was decreased. The tensional and spontaneous contractions of the SO were under the control of the neural and hormonal mechanism. The anastomosis of gallbladder and jejunum and the drainage of bile made the tensional contraction stronger, but the spontaneous contraction weakened after the operation due to the decreases of the sensitivity of SO to hormonal factors. The clinical symptoms may not be relieved when the patients with SO dysfunction accepted cholecystojejunostomy.
Cholecystectomy/*adverse effects
;
Common Bile Duct/*physiopathology
;
Gallbladder Emptying/*physiology
;
Jejunostomy/*adverse effects
;
Manometry/methods
;
Muscle Contraction
;
Postoperative Period
;
Random Allocation
;
Sphincter of Oddi/*physiopathology
3.The effects of cholecystojejunostomy and biliary drainage on biliary motor.
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) 2002;22(2):144-147
Simulating physiological neuronal and hormonal conditions during digestive and interdigestive periods, the study identified the changes of the motility of biliary system including bile duct and sphincter of Oddi (SO) before and after cholecystojejunostomy. Thirty-five rabbits were divided into five groups randomly. The experimental groups received the venous injection of CCK 10 ng/kg, erythromycin 10 mg/kg, atropine 3 micrograms/kg and L-NAME 10 mg/kg respectively. Each rabbit underwent manometry through introducing a three-lumen catheter via the papilla retrogradely, using the low-compliance papillary infusion system. Then the gallbladder and the upper segment of the jejunum was anastomosed and the manometric procedures repeated after one week. SO basal pressure was increased, contraction amplitude decreased, contraction time shortened after cholecystojejunostomy. L-NAME, CCK and erythromycin could all excite SO. L-NAME could increase basal pressure and contraction amplitude, CCK increase basal pressure contraction amplitude and frequency, and erythromycin increase contraction amplitude, respectively. But comparing with that before cholecystojejunostomy, the increasing extent was decreased. The tensional and spontaneous contractions of the SO were under the control of the neural and hormonal mechanism. The anastomosis of gallbladder and jejunum and the drainage of bile made the tensional contraction stronger, but the spontaneous contraction weakened after the operation due to the decreases of the sensitivity of SO to hormonal factors. The clinical symptoms may not be relieved when the patients with SO dysfunction accepted cholecystojejunostomy.
Animals
;
Cholecystectomy
;
adverse effects
;
Common Bile Duct
;
physiopathology
;
Female
;
Gallbladder Emptying
;
physiology
;
Jejunostomy
;
adverse effects
;
Male
;
Manometry
;
methods
;
Muscle Contraction
;
Postoperative Period
;
Rabbits
;
Random Allocation
;
Sphincter of Oddi
;
physiopathology
4.Clinical application of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy in critically ill patients.
Wei-Ming KANG ; Jian-Chun YU ; Zhi-Qiang MA ; Xiao-Hong LIU
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2008;30(3):253-256
OBJECTIVETo explore the clinical value of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy (PEG/J) in critically ill patients.
METHODSWe retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 30 critically ill patients who received PEG/J in our hospital. The indications, key operation procedures, peri-operative preparation, complications, and efficacy were recorded.
RESULTSTwenty-nine critically ill patients successfully received PEG/J. The mean operation time of PEG and PEJ were (7.5 +/- 2.5) min and (12.5 +/- 8.2) min, respectively, and the duration of tube functioning was (230 +/- 159) d; no procedure-related complications and serious complications were observed. Complications included local soft tissue infection (n = 1), J-tube dislodgment (n = 1), and obstruction of jejunal tube (n = 2). The serum levels of albumin and pre-albumin increased 4 weeks after operation; however, no significant difference was observed.
CONCLUSIONPEG/J is an effective, micro-invasive, safe, and convenient approach to establish a long-term gastrointestinal nutrition route for critically ill patients.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Critical Illness ; Enteral Nutrition ; methods ; Female ; Gastroscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Gastrostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Jejunostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Serum Albumin ; metabolism
5.Clinical application of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy.
Zhi-Ming WANG ; Zhi-Wei JIANG ; Yan-Qing DIAO ; Su-Mei WU ; Kai DING ; Ning LI ; Jie-Shou LI
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2008;30(3):249-252
OBJECTIVETo summarize the clinical experiences in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)/percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ).
METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 578 patients who received either PEG or PEJ from July 2001 to December 2007 in our hospital. The data analyzed included the type, aim, duration, success rate, and complications of these procedures.
RESULTSOf 578 patients, 247 patients underwent PEG, 293 patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEGJ), 4 patients received percutaneous endoscopic duodenostomy (PED), 4 patients underwent direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ), 4 patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic colostomy (PEC), and 26 patients received PEG/J combined stents. These procedures were performed in different clinical conditions, including enteral nutrition (n = 329), decompression combined enteral nutrition (n = 133), decompression of the gastrointestinal tract (n = 103), enteral nutrition combined bile refeeding (n = 5), perioperative applications (n = 4), and coloclysis (n = 4). Tubes were successfully placed in 578 patients (98.0%) in an average time of (7.5 +/- 1.9) min in PEG, (17.7 +/- 4.2) min in PEGJ, (14.8 +/- 2.1) min in DPEJ, (12.3 +/- 2.5) min in PED, (11.3 +/- 2.6) min in PEC, and (30.2 +/- 5.2) min in PEG/J combined stent, respectively. No procedure-related complications were observed. Major complications were found in 6 patients (1.04%) and minor complications in 36 patients (6.23%). The duration of tube functioning was (168.37 +/- 198.64) d.
CONCLUSIONSPEG/PEJ are easy to handle, effective, safe, and convenient for nursing. The endoscopic method of tube placement can be performed at the bedside and allow for enteral feeding, gastrointestinal decompression, and internal biliary drainage to be rapidly and efficiently achieved.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Enteral Nutrition ; methods ; Female ; Gastroscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Gastrostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Jejunostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult