1.The Effect of STW5 (Iberogast) on Reflux Symptoms in Patients With Concurrent Dyspeptic Symptoms:A Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial
Renske A B Oude NIJHUIS ; Thijs KUIPERS ; Jac M OORS ; Thomas V K HERREGODS ; Boudewijn F KESSING ; Jeroen M SCHUITENMAKER ; Andreas J P M SMOUT ; Albert J BREDENOORD
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2024;30(1):54-63
Background/Aims:
It has been suggested that STW5 (Iberogast) reduces heartburn symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia, but underlying mechanisms of action are unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate whether STW5 affects esophageal sensitivity or esophageal motility, thereby reducing occurrence and perception of reflux events.
Methods:
We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in patients with functional dyspepsia (Rome IV) and reflux symptoms. After 4 weeks of treatment with either placebo or STW5, patients were studied with an esophageal acid perfusion test and ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring.
Results:
A total of 18 patients (7 men, median age 54, range [19-76]), were included in the study. Although we found no statistical difference in our primary outcome the total Reflux Disease Questionnaire score 2.33 (0.25-4.33) vs 2.67 (1.17-4.00), P = 0.347, “gastroesophageal reflux disease” and “regurgitation” subscale scores were lower after STW5 treatment compared to placebo (P = 0.049 and P = 0.007). There was no statistical difference in number of reflux events, acid exposure time and acid sensitivity scores between STW5 and placebo. In a subgroup analysis of patients with pH-metry confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease, treatment with STW5 significantly reduced the total number of acidic reflux events (P = 0.028). Moreover, in patients with reflux esophagitis, the median lag time to acid perception increased after STW5 treatment (P = 0.042).
Conclusions
We found some indications pointing towards a beneficial effect of STW5 on reflux symptoms in dyspeptic patients, with reduction of esophageal hypersensitivity as a potential underlying mechanism. Our findings will have to be confirmed in larger studies.
2.The treatment of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
BS Teh ; C Bloch ; M Galli-Guevara ; L Doh ; S Richardson ; S Chiang ; P Yeh ; M Gonzalez ; W Lunn ; R Marco ; J Jac ; AC Paulino ; HH Lu ; EB Butler ; RJ Amato
Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal 2007;3(1):1-9
Purpose: Brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been successfully treated with stereotactic
radiosurgery (SRS). Metastases to extra-cranial sites may be treated with similar success using stereotactic body
radiation therapy (SBRT), where image-guidance allows for the delivery of precise high-dose radiation in a few fractions.
This paper reports the authors’ initial experience with image-guided SBRT in treating primary and metastatic RCC.
Materials and methods: The image-guided Brainlab Novalis stereotactic system was used. Fourteen patients with
23 extra-cranial metastatic RCC lesions (orbits, head and neck, lung, mediastinum, sternum, clavicle, scapula, humerus,
rib, spine and abdominal wall) and two patients with biopsy-proven primary RCC (not surgical candidates) were treated
with SBRT (24-40 Gy in 3-6 fractions over 1-2 weeks). All patients were immobilised in body cast or head and neck
mask. Image-guidance was used for all fractions. PET/CT images were fused with simulation CT images to assist in
target delineation and dose determination. SMART (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost
approach was adopted. 4D-CT was utilised to assess tumour/organ motion and assist in determining planning target
volume margins.
Results: Median follow-up was nine months. Thirteen patients (93%) who received SBRT to extra-cranial
metastases achieved symptomatic relief. Two patients had local progression, yielding a local control rate of 87%. In the two patients with primary RCC, tumour size remained unchanged but their pain improved, and their renal function was
unchanged post SBRT. There were no significant treatment-related side effects.
Conclusion: Image-guided SBRT provides excellent symptom palliation and local control without any significant
toxicity. SBRT may represent a novel, non-invasive, nephron-sparing option for the treatment of primary RCC as well as extra-cranial metastatic RCC.