Acupuncture and Moxibustion are useful traditional medicine that are widely applicable for various kinds of health care services including health maintenance, health promotion or palliative care. Conventional medicine has been developed focusing mainly on curing diseases. However, recent changes in the medical structure that is characterized by an increase in the elderly and chronic diseases emphasize the importance of preventive or amenity medicine or medicine that focuses more on welfare services. Since a unitary system of modern medicine was not suitable to respond to these demands, the necessity of medicine that cares for patients with the view point of welfare has emerged. Also, from the viewpoint of holistic medicine, traditional therapies as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) have been attracting public attention and extending its field of application. These changes suggest the importance of an integrated approach from the viewpoint of patient oriented, holistic, and welfare medicine. We herein discuss the 'Role of Acupuncture and Moxibustion in Welfare'. In order to understand the situation, we need a common point of view to mediate between welfare and medicine with the knowledge of the relationship between these systems. We should discuss how acupuncture and moxibustion medicine can bear the role as well as its possibilities. Outlines of the presentations by invited specialists are as following;Dr. Tadakazu Kumatani will present the relationship between medicine and welfare. He will introduce social workers who support care-at-home or rehabilitation by assisting the patients and their families to solve or regulate economic, psychological and social problems in the health care system as well as their histories. Dr. Ippei Watanabe will state the idea and viewpoint that is common between welfare and acupuncture and moxibustion, and Dr. Tadasu Matsumoto will introduce practical applications of acupuncture and moxibustion in welfare and will state the usefulness and possibilities of acupuncture and moxibustion in the field.
When we view society in the future, medicine is expected to be developed in cooperation with welfare systems. It is necessary for specialists in each field to cooperate. Also, it is necessary to develop a welfare-medical system to provide sufficient services in compliance with demands of each patient, which is based on a firm idea. We would like to suggest role of acupuncture in welfare systems as well as its future and ideas.

Background: Borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PAC) is defined as locally advanced tumor of the pancreas without metastasis that is, although potentially resectable (R), at high risk for positive resection margin following surgery. The therapeutic strategy has remained unestablished because BR-PAC is biologically a heterogeneous subset in which the preoperative prognostic factors are undetermined. Recently, several prognostic factors related to systemic inflammation have been explored in various kinds of cancers: the combination of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin as the modified Glasgow prognostic factor; a combination of CRP and white blood cell count in the prognostic index; a combination of albumin and lymphocyte counts in Onodera’s prognostic nutritional index; the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR); and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Although these prognostic factors have been explored in some small cohort studies of PAC patients, the results still remain controversial especially because PAC patients with diverse clinical stages were included in the cohorts. It has never been reported whether or not the systemic inflammatory response is validated as a predictive risk factor in cohorts of only advanced BR-PAC patients. Method: Between January 2003 and June 2012 at Kobe University Hospital, 136 consecutive pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients who underwent surgical curative resection were retrospectively studied. Prior to surgery, the PAC patients were stratified into R- and BR-PAC patients according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. To evaluate the independent prognostic significance of NLR and PLR, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models were applied. Results: The median survival in PAC patients with preoperative NLR > 3 (n=45) and NLR < 3 (n=91) was 17.5 months and 31.1 months, respectively (P=0.0037). However, the median survival in PAC patients with PLR > 225 (n=32) and PLR < 225 (n=104) was 21.8 months and 26.2 months, showing no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P=0.2526). The median survival in the R-PAC patients with NLR > 3 (n=38) and NLR < 3 (n=70) was 18.1 months and 33.1 months, respectively (P=0.0138). However, the median survival in the R-PAC patients with PLR > 225 (n=27) and PLR < 225 (n=81) was 24.1 months and 25.8 months, showing no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P=0.6533). The median survival in BR-PAC patients with preoperative NLR > 3 (n=7) and NLR < 3 (n=21) was 14.8 months and 27.2 months, respectively (P=0.0068). In addition, median survival in BR-PAC patients with preoperative PLR > 225 (n=5) and PLR < 225 (n=23) was 14.8 months and 26.2 months, respectively (P=0.0050). Preoperative NLR > 3 (HR=21.437, 95% CI=4.119-142.980; P=0.0002) and PLR > 225 (HR=30.993, 95% CI=3.844- 384.831; P=0.0009) were the only independent prognostic factors in BR-PAC patients. Conclusion: Preoperative NLR and PLR offer independent prognostic information regarding overall survival in BR-PAC patients following curative resection. The workup is only to obtain a blood sample of 3 mL from PAC patients immediately before treatment. In the near future, these factors associated with the systemic inflammatory response may have the potential to become criteria for BRPAC candidates to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgical resection

Background: Borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PAC) isdefined as locally advanced tumor of the pancreas without metastasis that is,although potentially resectable (R), at high risk for positive resection marginfollowing surgery. The therapeutic strategy has remained unestablished becauseBR-PAC is biologically a heterogeneous subset in which the preoperativeprognostic factors are undetermined. Recently, several prognostic factors relatedto systemic inflammation have been explored in various kinds of cancers: thecombination of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin as the modifiedGlasgow prognostic factor; a combination of CRP and white blood cell countin the prognostic index; a combination of albumin and lymphocyte counts inOnodera’s prognostic nutritional index; the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR);and the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Although these prognostic factors havebeen explored in some small cohort studies of PAC patients, the results still remaincontroversial especially because PAC patients with diverse clinical stages wereincluded in the cohorts. It has never been reported whether or not the systemicinflammatory response is validated as a predictive risk factor in cohorts of onlyadvanced BR-PAC patients.Method: Between January 2003 and June 2012 at Kobe University Hospital,136 consecutive pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) patients who underwentsurgical curative resection were retrospectively studied. Prior to surgery, the PACpatients were stratified into R- and BR-PAC patients according to the NationalComprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. To evaluate the independentprognostic significance of NLR and PLR, univariate and multivariate Coxproportional-hazard models were applied.Results: The median survival in PAC patients with preoperative NLR > 3 (n=45)and NLR < 3 (n=91) was 17.5 months and 31.1 months, respectively (P=0.0037).However, the median survival in PAC patients with PLR > 225 (n=32) and PLR< 225 (n=104) was 21.8 months and 26.2 months, showing no significantdifference in overall survival between the two groups (P=0.2526). The mediansurvival in the R-PAC patients with NLR > 3 (n=38) and NLR < 3 (n=70) was 18.1months and 33.1 months, respectively (P=0.0138). However, the median survivalin the R-PAC patients with PLR > 225 (n=27) and PLR < 225 (n=81) was 24.1months and 25.8 months, showing no significant difference in overall survivalbetween the two groups (P=0.6533). The median survival in BR-PAC patientswith preoperative NLR > 3 (n=7) and NLR < 3 (n=21) was 14.8 months and 27.2months, respectively (P=0.0068). In addition, median survival in BR-PAC patientswith preoperative PLR > 225 (n=5) and PLR < 225 (n=23) was 14.8 months and26.2 months, respectively (P=0.0050). Preoperative NLR > 3 (HR=21.437, 95%CI=4.119-142.980; P=0.0002) and PLR > 225 (HR=30.993, 95% CI=3.844-384.831; P=0.0009) were the only independent prognostic factors in BR-PACpatients.Conclusion: Preoperative NLR and PLR offer independent prognostic informationregarding overall survival in BR-PAC patients following curative resection. Theworkup is only to obtain a blood sample of 3 mL from PAC patients immediatelybefore treatment. In the near future, these factors associated with the systemicinflammatory response may have the potential to become criteria for BRPACcandidates to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or neoadjuvantchemoradiation followed by surgical resection