1.Field exercises are useful for improving public health emergency responses
Eastwood Keith ; Durrheim David ; Merritt Tony ; Massey Peter D ; Huppatz Claire ; Dalton Craig ; Hope Kirsty ; Moran Lucille ; Speare Richard ; Farrar Kris
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response 2010;1(1):12-18
Problem:Emergencies resulting from disease outbreaks and extreme environmental events present significant challenges for health services.
Context: Preparing public health units to effectively manage emergencies is a core activity. Field exercises support consolidation of biopreparedness by testing plans, identifying weaknesses, providing training opportunities and developing surge capacity.
Action: An extended field exercise to test the health response to a novel influenza strain was conducted in northern New South Wales, Australia in September 2008, eight months before the influenza AH1N1 pandemic emerged. Lasting four days and involving over 300 participants, the exercise was set in the early response phase with the staggered presentation of 41 cases to 36 emergency departments in the health area. An additional 150 contacts were written into a complex scenario to test the public health response.
Outcome: The subsequent pandemic emergence in mid-2009 offered a unique opportunity to assess the field exercise format for disaster preparedness. Most roles were adequately tested with recognized benefit during the actual pandemic response. However, the exercise did not adequately challenge the public health planning team that synthesizes surveillance data and forecasts risk, nor did it identify planning issues that became evident during the subsequent pandemic.
Discussion: Field exercises offer the opportunity to rigorously test public health emergency preparedness but can be expensive and labour-intensive. Our exercise provided effective and timely preparation for the 2009 influenza pandemic but showed that more emphasis needs to be placed on the role and training of the public health planning team, an area that may be neglected.