1.Barriers to implementing a national health screening program for men in Malaysia: An online survey of healthcare providers
Chirk Jenn Ng ; Chin Hai Teo ; Kar Mun Ang ; Yong Leng Kok ; Khalid Ashraf ; Hui Ling Leong ; Sri Wahyu Taher ; Zakiah Mohd Said ; Zainal Fitri Zakaria ; Ping Foo Wong ; Chee Peng Hor ; Teng Aik Ong ; Husni Hussain ; V Paranthaman P Vengadasalam ; Chiu Wan Ng ; Kavitha Agamutu ; Mohamad Aznuddin Abd Razak
Malaysian Family Physician 2020;15(1):6-14
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the views and practices of healthcare providers and
barriers they encountered when implementing the national health screening program for men in a
public primary care setting in Malaysia.
Methods: An online survey was conducted among healthcare providers across public health clinics in
Malaysia. All family medicine specialists, medical officers, nurses and assistant medical officers involved in the screening program for adult men were invited to answer a 51-item questionnaire via email or WhatsApp. The questionnaire comprised five sections: participants’ socio-demographic information, current screening practices, barriers and facilitators to using the screening tool, and views on the content and format of the screening tool.
Results: A total of 231 healthcare providers from 129 health clinics participated in this survey.
Among them, 37.44% perceived the implementation of the screening program as a “top-down
decision.” Although 37.44% found the screening tool for adult men “useful,” some felt that it was
“time consuming” to fill out (38.2%) and “lengthy” (28.3%). In addition, ‘adult men refuse to answer’
(24.1%) was cited as the most common patient-related barrier.
Conclusions: This study provided useful insights into the challenges encountered by the public
healthcare providers when implementing a national screening program for men. The screening tool for
adult men should be revised to make it more user-friendly. Further studies should explore the reasons
why men were reluctant to participate in health screenings, thus enhancing the implementation of
screening programs in primary care.
2.Cast immobilisation for the treatment of paediatric distal radius fracture: fibreglass versus polyolefin.
Meng ZHU ; Elvin Salioc LOKINO ; Cheri Su Hui CHAN ; Arlene Jeremie GAN ; Ling Ling ONG ; Kevin Boon Leong LIM
Singapore medical journal 2019;60(4):183-187
INTRODUCTION:
Stable distal radius fractures in children are frequently treated by immobilisation with a cast and heal readily without complications. This randomised clinical trial aimed to assess patient satisfaction and casting-related clinical outcomes when using polyolefin cast, a new cast material, compared to the conventional fibreglass cast.
METHODS:
A total of 80 patients (age range 7-16 years) with radiograph-confirmed stable distal radius fractures were recruited. They were randomised to either the fibreglass group or polyolefin group, with short arm cast immobilisation for 20-30 days. After cast removal, the incidence of skin rash, growth of hair and cast breakage was recorded along with the administration of patient satisfaction questionnaires. Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher's exact test was applied to compare results.
RESULTS:
Overall, 34 patients from the fibreglass group and 31 patients from the polyolefin group were included in the final analysis. Significantly fewer patients from the polyolefin group reported itchiness during the casting period (p = 0.038). However, significantly more cast breakages were observed for the polyolefin group in the palmar bar region (p = 0.009). Patients from the polyolefin group were overall more satisfied (fibreglass group = 3.15/5 vs. polyolefin group = 3.74/5; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION
Polyolefin cast reduces itchiness during casting and provides higher overall patient satisfaction during the treatment of stable distal radius fractures in children in tropical climates. However, patients should be counselled regarding potential cast breakage, which did not compromise safety, and the higher costs involved.