Objective    To evaluate the midterm effect of valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) on aortic root aneurysm and moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR). Methods    The clinical data of patients with aortic root aneurysm and moderate to severe AR undergoing VSRR and surviving from the operation from October 2013 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 31 males and 9 females, with an average age of 47.1±13.4 years. There were 30 patients with true aneurysm of aortic root and 10 patients with dissecting aneurysm of aortic root. There were 3 patients with bicuspid aortic valve, and 12 patients with Marfan syndrome. The AR measured by the echocardiogram was moderate in 18 patients and severe in 22 patients. The average diameter of aortic annulus was 27.0±3.9 mm, and the mean largest diameter of aortic sinus was 52.3±6.1 mm. Results    A total of 32 patients underwent David technique and 8 patients underwent Yacoub technique, and 10 patients underwent aortic cusp repair simultaneously. All 40 patients  completed the follow-up, and the follow-up period was 12-86 (45.7±18.9) months. During the period, 1 patient died of heart failure, 2 had reoperation due to new-onset Stanford B aortic dissection, and no patients had reoperation related to aortic valve. The postoperative New York Heart Association cardiac function classification (1.6±0.5 vs. 2.8±0.8), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (52.2±7.8 mm vs. 61.4±10.6 mm) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (136.0±58.8 mL vs. 193.3±83.9 mL) of the patients were significantly improved compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). By echocardiography, 19 patients had no AR, 18 patients had mild AR, 3 patients had mild-moderate AR, and no patients had moderate or higher AR. Conclusion    In patients with aortic root aneurysm and moderate to severe AR, VSRR technique avoids prosthetic valves and anticoagulation-related complications, has lower rate of AR recurrence and reoperation, and improves the quality of life in the midterm period.

Objective    To evaluate the short and mid-term outcomes of valve repair in patients with insufficient bicuspid aortic valves (BAV). Methods    The clinical data of 27 consecutive patients with insufficient BAV undergoing valve repair in Shanghai Chest Hospital from September 2016 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 24 males and 3 females with a mean age of 38.5±14.6 years (range: 20-68 years). BAV of all patients was type 1 in Seviers' classification. There were 23 patients with left-right fusion and 4 patients with right-noncoronary fusion. There was aortic regurgitation in the patients measured by the echocardiogram, including moderate regurgitation in 3 patients, moderate-severe in 18 patients, and severe in 6 patients. The diameter of aortic annular base was 27.9±3.4 mm, and the largest diameter of aortic sinus was 39.9±7.6 mm. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter was 62.7±6.5 mm, and the volume was 197.9±53.6 mL. Results    All 27 patients completed the follow-up, and the mean time was 24.2±12.5 months (range: 12-51 months). No patient died or required aortic valve-related reoperation during the follow-up. The cardiac function of the patients significantly improved postoperatively (P<0.05). By echocardiography, 11 patients had no aortic regurgitation, 13 had mild aortic regurgitation, and 3 had moderate aortic regurgitation, and no patient had severe aortic regurgitation. Postoperative left ventricular end diastolic diameter and volume decreased, compared to preoperative ones (P<0.05). Conclusion    In patients with insufficient BAV, valve repair is safe and effective, and has excellent short and mid-term outcomes.