Objective To observe the effect of different staining reagent and time on acid fast bacilli staining and study its quality control measures.Methods We collected 38 cases for positive acid fast bacilli stain.Every wax blocked into 4 pieces,with different staining reagent and time of acid fast staining.Results Using xylene and ethanol staining for 20 minutes,acid fast bacilli was discontinuous and red punctate.Zero cases were positive and the positive rate was 0%.Turpentine dyeing for 1 5 minutes group,acid fast bacilli was clear,bright red,slightly bent branched,and easy to identify.A total of 34 cases were positive and posi-tive rate was 89%.Turpentine dyeing process for 20 minutes,the whole background was red,and was not easy identification.A total of 28 cases were positive and the positive rate was 74%.Turpentine dyeing for 30 minutes,the background was entirely deep red, and was hard to discern the acid fast bacilli.A total of 27 cases were positive and the positive rate was 71%.Conclusion Different staining reagent and time had different positive staining results.Suitable turpentine process was stained for 1 5 minutes for acid fast bacilli.

Objective:To investigate the value of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) in improving ability of demonstrating ocular masses on 3.0 T MR scanner.Methods:This study was a multi-center prospective study involving 6 centers. From July 2018 to January 2020, totally 413 patients with ocular masses from 6 centers were prospectively enrolled, and all of them underwent T 1WI and T 2WI, PROPELLER T 1 FLAIR and T 2WI, and contrast-enhanced scans. The signal intensity of eyelid, vitreous body, lacrimal gland, intraorbital segment of optic nerve, and orbital masses of eyelid, intraocular, lacrimal gland and retrobulbar were measured by two radiologists, and the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The 5-point scoring method was used to evaluate the motion artefacts, tumor edges and the relationship between the tumor and adjacent structures, and the overall score of image quality was calculated. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the image quality between PROPELLER and non-PROPELLER images. Results:The SNR and CNR of PROPELLER T 2WI were higher than those of non-PROPELLER T 2WI (all P<0.001). The SNR and CNR of PROPELLER T 1 FLAIR were lower than those of non-PROPELLER T 1WI (all P<0.05). The scores of artefacts and overall image quality in PROPELLER images were higher than those in non-PROPELLER images (all P<0.001). The tumor edge and the relationship between the tumor and adjacent structures scores of eyelid, intraocular, and lacrimal gland masses in PROPELLER images were higher than those in non-PROPELLER images (all P<0.001),while compared to non-PROPELLER images, retro-global masses in PROPELLER images showed no significant differences (all P>0.05). Conclusion:PROPELLER can reduce ocular motion artefacts, effectively improve image quality and ability of demonstrating anterior (eyelid, intraocular, and lacrimal gland) masses.

Objective:To investigate the value of the 8-channel eye surface phased array coil in improving image quality and demonstrating ocular masses on 3.0 T MR scanner.Methods:From July 2018 to January 2020, the data of orbital MRI in 692 patients with ocular masses on 6 medical centers were prospectively collected. The patients were simple randomly assigned into 8-channel eye surface phased array coil group (413 patients) or 8-channel head phased array coil group (279 patients), with the same MRI sequences. The signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were calculated in orbital anatomy structures and masses (eyelid mass, intraocular mass, lacrimal mass and orbital mass). The image quality scores including motion artifact, mass margin, the relationship between the mass and adjacent structures, and overall image quality were recorded. The differences of image quality between the two groups were compared by two independent sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank test. Results:The SNR and CNR were higher in eye surface coil group than those in head coil group ( P<0.05). The scores of ocular movement artifacts were higher in head coil group than those in surface coil group ( P<0.05). The scores of intraocular mass margin, the relationship between the mass and adjacent structures, and overall image quality were higher in surface coil group than those in head coil group ( P<0.001). There were no significant differences in mass margin, the relationship between the mass and adjacent structures, and overall image quality scores of eyelid, lacrimal gland, and orbital mass between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:3.0 T MR scanner combined with the 8-channel eye surface phased array coil can improve the SNR and CNR of orbital MR images, the demonstration of the intraocular mass margin and the relationship between the mass and adjacent structures.