BACKGROUND:Numerous studies have focused on the clinical efficacy of alogeneic bone graft and humeral head replacement for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures, but their comparative studies are rarely reported. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effect of alogeneic bone grafting in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the high risk group. METHODS:Clinical data of 120 cases of proximal humeral fractures aged≥ 60 years were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty of the 120 cases underwent alogeneic bone grafting combined with locking plate fixation as experimental group, and the other 60 cases were subjected to semi-shoulder joint replacement as control group. Al patients were folowed up for 8-24 months. Fracture healing, colodiaphyseal angle, humeral head height and shoulder joint function were observed and measured. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:During the postoperative 8-24 months, al the fractures were healed by first intention, and there were no rejection reactions, large/smal nodules, humeral head displacement, necrosis, and screw loosening. Loss of the humeral head height at the last folow-up and the active flexion angle of the shoulder at postoperative 12 weeks were significantly higher in the experimental group than the control group (P < 0.05). Scores on forearm, shoulder and hand dysfunction were significantly lower in the experimental group than the control group (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in the colodiaphyseal angle and SF-36 scores between the two groups. These finding indicate that alogeneic bone grafting can strength the internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures in the high-risk group, and improve patient’s upper limb function.