Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Qianliejiedu capsule in the treatment of chronic prostatitis. Methods A multi-central,randomized,double-blind clinical trial was conducted.A total of 209 patients diagnosed as chronic prostatitis were randomly divided into two groups:the trial group were treated with Qianliejiedu Capsule,5 pills were taken orally for each time,twice a day;the control group were given Qianlietai Pill,5 pills were taken orally for each time and 3 times a day.All patients of the tWO groups were treated for 4 weeks,The efficacy was evaluated by urethra irritating,painful or discomfortable symptoms,and the WBC count in EPS after the treatment.Clinical criteria divided into 4 types,cure:symptom score compared with a decrease≥90%;markedly effective:symptom score compared with a decrease of 60%to 89%;effective:symptom score comparedwith a decrease of 30%to 59%;invalid:symptom score compared with a decrease of＜30%.Results There were 102 patients in the treatment group,11 got cured,49 cases were remarkably effectire,28 eases were effective,14 eases were ineffective and the total effective rate was 86.2%(88/102).There were 98 patients in the treatment group,4 got cured,38 cases were remarkably effective,35 cases were effective,21 cases were ineffective,and the total effective rate was 78.6%(77/98).The trial group and the control group could improve the symptoms such as frequent micturition,the remaining urine,the lower abdomen ache,the urethra stabbing pain,the unwell perineum,the waist and sacrum ache,the moist scrotum,and the testicle ache.The vanishing rate of the trial group was 87.6%,82.1%,74.5%,84.1%,93.7%,80.3%,82.5%,82.3%;and the control group was 74.7%,73.0%,71.0%,74.2%,71.4%,67.9%,72.3%,76.2%.The vanishing rates of frequent micturition symptom of the 2 groups were significantly different(P=0.032).The result of WBC of the trial group before treatment was as follows:WBC 10-19 28 cases,WBC 20-29 33 cases,WBC≥30 41 cases.The result of WBC of the trial group after treatment was as follows:WBC＜10 45cases,WBC 10-19 34 cases,WBC 20-29 20 cases,WBC≥30 3 cases.The result of WBC of the control group before treatment was as follows:WBC 10-19 26 cases,WBC 20-29 35 cases,WBC:≥30 37 cases.The result of WBC of the control group after treatment was as follows:WBC＜10 42 caaes,WBC 10-19 33 cases,WBC 20-29 15 cases,WBC≥30 8 cases.There were significant differences between the before and after treatment results(P＜0.05).Two cases in the trial group and 3 cases in the control group had mild adverse reactions such as nausea,epigastric discomfort,and watery stool. Conclusion Qianliejiedu capsule is effective and safe for the treatment of chronic prostatitis.

Objective To evaluate the impact of aderent perirenal fat (APF) on retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RLPN). Methods Clinical data of 52 patients who underwent RLPN for a small renal tumor from October 2013 to December 2015 was analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of APF by preoperative computed tomography imaging. Clinical data was collected including patients' age, gender, BMI, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA), intra-abdominal fat (IAF), tumor size, RENAL Nephrometry score (RNS), operative time, warm ischaemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of hospital stay. Results Between the two groups, the BMI, tumor size, WIT, length of hospital stay were similar [(26.70 ± 3.33) kg/m2 vs (25.65 ± 4.01) kg/m2, (3.53 ± 1.21) cm vs (3.64 ± 1.05) cm, (27.17 ± 7.55) min vs (25.21 ± 5.64) min, (12.54 ± 4.06) d vs (10.61 ± 3.70) d, P > 0.05)], as well as the ASA and RNS. APF patients were older [(59.25 ± 11.03) y vs (49.71 ± 11.86) y, P = 0.004]. There were a high proportion of men (75.0% vs 46.4%, P = 0.036), patients with hypertension (62.5% vs 28.6%, P = 0.014), and patients with diabetes (41.7% vs 14.3%, P = 0.026). In the APF group, IAF was more [(2.02 ± 0.47) cm vs (1.35 ± 0.66) cm, P = 0.000], operative time was longer [(146.08 ± 45.45) min vs (119.32 ± 28.83) min, P = 0.017], and EBL was higher [(82.92 ± 45.73) ml vs (51.79 ± 25.10) ml, P = 0.005]. Conclusion The adherent preirenal fat sticking renal results in a longer operative time and a higher EBL, but has no influences on the WIT and length of hospital stay. APF makes it difficult to expose the tumor, not to remove it.