1.The effect observation of comprehensive intervention on postoperative pain of patients with rectal disease
Feng WANG ; Wenjun ZHANG ; Huizhi YU ; Keling YU ; Daisong CHEN ; Hongqiu QI ; Jing LIU
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing 2017;33(18):1395-1398
Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive intervention on postoperative pain of patients with rectal disease. Methods A total of 200 patients with postoperative pain after the treatment of anorectal perianal disease from May 2015 to May 2016 were randomly divided into two groups with 100 cases each. The control group was treated with drugs and usual nursing, the observation group were adopted drugs and comprehensive nursing intervention. The improvement of pain, psychological states and the quality of sleep were compared between two groups. Results The VAS pain scores at 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 h after treatment was (2.1 ± 0.6), (3.3 ± 0.4), (3.5 ± 0.3), (2.3 ± 0.5), (1.9 ± 0.5) points in the observation group, and (3.0 ± 0.5), (5.1 ± 0.6), (6.2 ± 0.6), (5.7 ± 0.8), (5.8 ± 0.5) points in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.539-38.806, P < 0.05). The Self-rating Anxiety Scale was (20.32 ± 6.16) points in the observation group, and (35.58 ± 7.43) points in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=41.188, P<0.05). The sleep quality, the amount of sleep , sleep time, sleep efficiency of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire scores was (0.91±0.28), (0.86±0.2), (0.83±0.27), (0.59±0.31), (0.62±0.27), (0.58±0.41), (4.39±1.79) points in the observation group, and (1.61± 0.88), (1.32 ± 0.75), (1.59 ± 0.89), (1.34 ± 0.58), (1.36 ± 0.45), (1.29 ± 0.86), (8.51 ± 3.55) points in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.557-17.740, all P<0.05). Conclusions The comprehensive intervention on postoperative pain relief in patients with anal disease is significant, it is beneficial to relieve the pain response, improve sleep quality, and achieve physical and psychological comfort, and has a positive effect to clinical.
2. Preliminary study of the relationship between novel coronavirus pneumonia and liver function damage: a multicenter study
Chuan LIU ; Zicheng JIANG ; Chuxiao SHAO ; Hongguang ZHANG ; Hongmei YUE ; Zhenhuai CHEN ; Baoyi MA ; Weiying LIU ; Huihong HUANG ; Jie YANG ; Yan WANG ; Hongyan LIU ; Dan XU ; Jitao WANG ; Junyan YANG ; Hongqiu PAN ; Shengqiang ZOU ; Fujian LI ; Junqiang LEI ; Xun LI ; Qing HE ; Ye GU ; Xiaolong QI
Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2020;28(2):148-152
Objective:
To analyze the clinical characteristics of cases of novel coronavirus pneumonia and a preliminary study to explore the relationship between different clinical classification and liver damage.
Methods:
Consecutively confirmed novel coronavirus infection cases admitted to seven designated hospitals during January 23, 2020 to February 8, 2020 were included. Clinical classification (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) was carried out according to the diagnosis and treatment program of novel coronavirus pneumonia (Trial Fifth Edition) issued by the National Health Commission. The research data were analyzed using SPSS19.0 statistical software. Quantitative data were expressed as median (interquartile range), and qualitative data were expressed as frequency and rate.
Results:
32 confirmed cases that met the inclusion criteria were included. 28 cases were of mild or moderate type (87.50%), and four cases (12.50%) of severe or critical type. Four cases (12.5%) were combined with one underlying disease (bronchial asthma, coronary heart disease, malignant tumor, chronic kidney disease), and one case (3.13%) was simultaneously combined with high blood pressure and malignant tumor. The results of laboratory examination showed that the alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin (ALB), and total bilirubin (TBil) for entire cohort were 26.98 (16.88 ~ 46.09) U/L and 24.75 (18.71 ~ 31.79) U/L, 39.00 (36.20 ~ 44.20) g/L and 16.40 (11.34- ~ 21.15) mmol/L, respectively. ALT, AST, ALB and TBil of the mild or moderate subgroups were 22.75 (16.31- ~ 37.25) U/L, 23.63 (18.71 ~ 26.50) U/L, 39.70 (36.50 ~ 46.10) g/L, and 15.95 (11.34 ~ 20.83) mmol/L, respectively. ALT, AST, ALB and TBil of the severe or critical subgroups were 60.25 (40.88 ~ 68.90) U/L, 37.00 (20.88 ~ 64.45) U/L, 35.75 (28.68 ~ 42.00) g/L, and 20.50 (11.28 ~ 25.00) mmol/L, respectively.
Conclusion
The results of this multicenter retrospective study suggests that novel coronavirus pneumonia combined with liver damage is more likely to be caused by adverse drug reactions and systemic inflammation in severe patients receiving medical treatment. Therefore, liver function monitoring and evaluation should be strengthened during the treatment of such patients.