Circulatory support devices have become an important component for transplantation programs as they successfully bridge unsalvageable patients who would otherwise die. Between October 1997 and April 2001, 6 patients in profound heart failure were treated with a percutaneous cardiopulmonary support system (PCPS), or with ventricular assist device (VAD), or with both PCPS and VAD. Two patients were treated only with a PCPS, and one weaned case survived. Another 2 patients, who had dilated cardiomyopathy, was treated with VAD. They improved hemodynamically, and their general conditions made them fit to be candidates for heart transplantation. Two other patients who had PCPS insertion before VAD died due to multiple organ failure. Before the application of VAD, the levels of total bilirubin were 14.9 and 20.9mg/dl respectively. In acute worsening of hemodynamics, PCPS is useful to maintain total circulation by quick application. However, long-term support with VAD should be considered to resuscitate impaired end-organ function by carefully selecting the timing of a VAD implantation.

The combined method of antegrade and retrograde administration of cardioplegic solution has been established for coronary bypass surgery. We applied this technique in patients undergoing aortic and mitral valve surgery. Between January 1989 and December 1990, 28 patients underwent both aortic and mitral valve replacements. To compare the myocardial protective effect according to the method of cardioplegic administration, they were divided into two groups; Ante group (antegrade, n=15) and Retro group (combined method of antegrade and retrograde, n=13). Aortic occlusion time and cardiopulmonary bypass time were shorter in Retro group. The mean interval of each cardioplegic administration was significantly shorter in Retro group (Ante group, 29.2±4.8min vs Retro group, 24.0±3.8min; p<0.01). These results suggest that retrograde cardioplegia method never disturbs ongoing operation during each delivery while antegrade method often does. Serum CPK-MB at 6hr of reperfusion tended to be less in Retro group (Ante group, 120±80IU/l vs Retro group, 78±50IU/l; p=0.09). The results of postoperative cardiac functions were the same in both groups. We therefore believe that this method is an optimal strategy even in patients with valvular heart disease.