1.Survey of the Use of Kampo Medicine at the Kampo Clinic
Nobutomo IKARASHI ; Kiyomi ITO ; Takayoshi KIMURA ; Tetsuo AKIBA ; Yoshifumi IRIE ; Kako WATANABE ; Motoko FUKUZAWA ; Hirokazu ISHII ; Kenji WATANABE ; Kiyoshi SUGIYAMA
Kampo Medicine 2009;60(4):435-442
Kampo medicines have been used for treatment by an increasing number of doctors in recent years, and are becoming more frequently prescribed in combination with Western drugs. In the present study, we conducted a questionnaire of outpatients at the Kampo Clinic of Keio University Hospital in order to determine their perceptions and compliance regarding Kampo medicines.Ninety eight percent of patients used Kampo medicines in granular form, and approximately 30% of these patients reported difficulty in taking medicine due to reasons such as “bad taste”. Sixty percent of patients used Kampo medicines three times daily. Patients most often forgot to take afternoon doses, and so desired doses once daily. Furthermore, the same number of patients preferred Kampo medicines in tablet form as those who preferred Kampo medicines in granular form.The present findings clarified patients' perceptions toward Kampo medicines. Doctors and pharmacists must provide suitable treatment for patients by recognizing their perceptions of Kampo medicines.
Medicine, Kampo
;
Clinic
;
Use of
;
percent
;
therapeutic aspects
2.Treatment of Acute Renal Failure Following Cardiovascular Operation Using Extracorporeal Circulation. Comparison between Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis(CPD) and Continuous Arterio-Venous Hemofiltration(CAVH).
Ichiya YAMAZAKI ; Jiroh KONDOH ; Kiyotaka IMOTO ; Hirokazu KAJIWARA ; Kazumi HOSHINO ; Akira SAKAMOTO ; Shin-ichi SUZUKI ; Susumu ISODA ; Masanori ISHII ; Akihiko MATSUMOTO
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 1993;22(1):14-20
There were 16 patients who developed acute renal failure (ARF) follwing cardiovascular operation using extracorporeal circulation. They were treated by either CPD or CAVH because their ARF were resistant to medical treatment. These patients were divided into three groups according to their treatment; 7 patients treated by CPD (Group A), 5 patients treated both CPD and CAVH (Group B), 4 patients treated by CAVH (Group C). The survival rate was 33% in Group A, 20% in Group B, and 0% in Group C. The prognosis of the each group was poor. CPD and CAVH were effective to control the concentration of serum potasium and water removing. But CPD and CAVH were not very effective to control the concentrations of serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen. There were three patients who developed low proteinemia which was one of the side effects of CPD. Seven of nine patients treated by CAVH, developed bleeding. The side effects of CAVH were seemed to be more severe than those of CPD.