1.EFFECT OF TWO PASSIVE STRETCHING METHODS FOR TRICEPS SURAE ON DORSIFLEXION OF ANKLE JOINT
TAKAYUKI INAMI ; TAKUYA SHIMIZU ; HIROFUMI MIYAGAWA ; MASAYUKI INOUE ; TAKEO NAKAGAWA ; FUJIMARU TAKAYANAGI ; SHIGEO NIWA
Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine 2010;59(5):549-554
Stretching for the triceps surae muscle in the knee flexed position (medical stretching: MS) and knee extended position (static stretching: SS) were performed and the effect on the dorsiflexion angle of the ankle joint was examined. Five elderly females were selected as subjects. We measured the maximal dorsiflexion angle of the ankle joint in the following leg positions: (1) the maximal dorsiflexion angle in the extended knee position (EDF angle) and (2) the maximal dorsiflexion angle in the 90°flexed-knee position (FDF angle). There was a significant increase in the maximal dorsiflexion angle after MS and SS were carried out (p<0.01), but there was no significant difference between MS and SS. It was concluded that MS for triceps surae is equally effective as SS in increasing the maximal dorsiflexion angle of the ankle joint.
2.A study of the triage function of referrals in an urban clinic
Kazuhiro Waza ; Shinsuke Fujita ; Takashi Yamada ; Maiko Ono ; Masaaki Yamaoka ; Junichi Mise ; Hirotaka Onishi ; Mikiya Sato ; Hirofumi Takayanagi ; Kenichi Sato
An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association 2015;38(2):111-115
Introduction : To promote disease management in the community, general physicians should refer their patients to specialists in a timely and appropriate manner. In this study, we propose an indicator for evaluation of such referrals.
Methods : We analyzed all referrals in an urban clinic from September 1, 2011 to August 31, 2012. Symptoms and diagnoses documented by general physicians were collected from medical records, and the final diagnoses by specialists were collected from their reports. The symptoms and diagnoses were classified using the International Classification of Primary Care second edition (ICPC-2). Referral rates, hospitalization rates, and place of referral were analyzed.
Results : The average number of encounters in the candidate clinic was 1402 per month, and the mean number of referrals was 23 (1.6% of encounters). Of patients who received a referral, 6.75 (29.1%) were admitted to hospitals. The symptoms and diagnoses of the referred patients were distributed across all chapters (A to Z) of ICPC-2. Diagnoses of admitted patients included pneumonia (R81) (24%), urinary tract infection (U70 and U71) (9%), and acute gastroenteritis with dehydration (D73 with T11) (9%).
Conclusion : We identified the referral rates, hospitalization rates, and distribution of referral patients as indicators of the triage function of primary care physicians. These should be evaluated further as potential indicators of “the quality of medical care.”