1.Clinical Reasoning Web-based Prototypic Module for Tutors Teaching 5th Grade Medical Students : A Pilot Randomized Study
Gerald H. Stein ; Hironobu Tokunaga ; Hirotaka Ando ; Mikako Obika ; Tomoko Miyoshi ; Yasuharu Tokuda ; Yoshinori Noguchi ; Mitsuyo Kinjo ; Shun Kohsaka ; Hitoshi Honda ; Yuka Kitano ; Hidetaka Kitazono ; Hitomi Kataoka ; Hidekazu Terasawa
General Medicine 2015;16(1):13-25
Background: At present clinical reasoning skills are not systematically taught in Japanese medical universities. We developed a prototypic preliminary module for clinical tutors to introduce clinical reasoning to Japanese medical students. We hypothesized that tutored medical students would outperform self-study students.
Method: Using the web-based Sequential Question and Answer test that rewarded history and differential diagnosis as proxies for clinical reasoning, we compared the pre and posttest scores of 12 randomized fifth grade tutored students at two universities during four tutor-led 1.5-hour web-based seminars using a structured syllabus to 12 randomized self-study students.
Results: The tutored and self-study groups’ pretest scores were statistically similar at about 40 out of 100 weighted correct points. The tutored students’ posttest scores were 62 points, significantly greater (p = 0.007) than the pretest mean 42 points, compared to the self-study students’ posttest scores of 52 points, significantly greater (p = 0.012) than pretest mean 40 points. The difference between the two posttest groups was of borderline statistical significance (p = 0.08).
Conclusions: We successfully assessed a prototypic module for tutors to introduce clinical reasoning to Japanese medical students. The tutored students achieved higher scores than the self-study students. Further research is needed to exploit the potential of our modular clinical reasoning system.
2.Endoscopic features of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the small intestine
Yutaro IHARA ; Takehiro TORISU ; Tomohiko MORIYAMA ; Junji UMENO ; Atsushi HIRANO ; Yasuharu OKAMOTO ; Yoshifumi HORI ; Hidetaka YAMAMOTO ; Takanari KITAZONO ; Motohiro ESAKI
Intestinal Research 2019;17(3):398-403
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is one of the most common types of submucosal tumors (SMTs). Because of GIST's malignant potential, it is crucial to differentiate it from other SMTs. The present study aimed to identify characteristic endoscopic findings of GISTs in the small intestine. METHODS: We reviewed the clinicopathological and endoscopic findings of 38 patients with endoscopically or surgically resected SMTs in the small intestine. SMTs were classified into GIST and non-GIST groups, and clinicopathological and endoscopic findings were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had GIST and 23 patients had other types of SMTs in the small intestine. Comparison of the endoscopic findings between the 2 groups revealed that dilated vessels in the surrounding mucosa were significantly more in number in the GIST group than in the non-GIST group (P<0.05). However, there were no other differences in endoscopic findings between the 2 groups. Among patients with GISTs, the presence of dilated vessels in the surrounding mucosa was not associated with bleeding risk, tumor size, or metastasis rate at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Dilated vessels in the surrounding mucosa, identified during balloon-assisted endoscopy, may be a diagnostic indicator for GIST in the small intestine. However, its clinical significance should be further analyzed.
Diagnosis
;
Endoscopy
;
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Intestine, Small
;
Mucous Membrane
;
Neoplasm Metastasis