Objective To elucidate whether taking Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a receptor antagonist instead of oral antiplatelet drugs during perioperative in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation undergoing non-cardiac surgery would play a preventive role of stent thrombosis,without increasing surgical bleeding.Methods Six patients aged 60 -75 years old with drug-eluting stent implantation within 1 year taking dual antiplatelet drugs without any chest pain,and whose heart function classification for two (NYHA) were enrolled.They underwent surgical treatment due to ineffective conservative treatment of surgical disease,5 days before surgery intravenous infusion tirofiban 0.1 μg/( kg · min) micro pumps continuously instead of oral dual antiplatelet drugs,2 hours before surgery stop tirofiban and re-application of tirofiban 0.1 μg/( kg · rain) after surgery in the intensive care unit,and replacing tirofiban with oral dual antiplatelet as soon as possible according to the situation.Analyze cardiovascular events,especially stent thrombosis events and seriously bleeding,tirofiban adverse drug events during perioperative.Results Six patients have no perioperative malignant ischemic ventricular arrhythmia,angina,myocardial infarction,sudden cardiac death,no massive bleeding and adverse drug reactions.Conclusion Substitution of oral dual antiplatelet drugs for Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a receptor antagonists to prevent stent thrombosis treatment during perioperative in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation undergoing non=cardiac surgery may be feasible and safe,but needs to be further confirmed through large sample of randomly controlled trials.

Objective To investigate the feasibility, safety and impact on performance indicators of coronary angio graphy, percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in day care ward of heart center. Methods 128 patients performing coronary angiography and receiving stent implantation or coronary artery bypass surgery when necessary from October 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The success rate of procedure, intraoperative and postoperative adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and interventional complications: coronary artery spasm, dissection, perforation and occlusion, contrast agent allergy, upper extremity edema, patients with osteofascial compartment syndrome and radial artery occlusion), average hospitalization days and medical expenses were compared with patients at the same period in general ward. Results Seventy-six cases underwent coronary angiography, among whom 35 cases received stent implantation and 17 cases received coronary artery bypass grafting. The success rate was 100%. Adverse events were radial artery spasm in 5 cases, puncture site hematoma in 3 cases and contrast agent allergy in 1 case. Day care ward significantly shortened the average hospitalization days (P<0.05); there was a downward trend, although there was no statistical difference in hospitalization expenses (P>0.05). Conclusions Coronary angiography and revascularization at the day care ward model is safe and feasible in the heart center if diagnostic and therapeutic techniques are mature.

Objective To apply sigma metrics to assess key indicators designed in the laboratory improvement plan to find problems and promote quality improvement.Methods Sigma metrics were calculated to reflect the performance of analytic phase including imprecision,inaccuracy and Turn around time(TAT).The quality control strategy was designed accordingly.Quality goal index(QGI)was calculated to find the cause of any error for the items exceeding 6 sigma.Quality of pre-,post-analytic and total analytic phase,such as quality of specimen,TAT,panic value notification and satisfaction of physicians and patients were measured in sigma metrics too.Results The average sigma metric of analytic phase was 4.44,while sigma metric for 8 of 27 test items were above 6?.The main cause of performance under 6o" was poor precision.The sigma metrics of quality of specimen,panic value notification,satisfaction of customer and emergent/routine TAT were 4.9,2.9,5.6,2.8,and 2.9 respectively.Conclusion Sigma metrics provide the objective marker for the evaluation of performance in each stage of analytic process.