1.Public and Private Hospitals in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, Malaysia: How Do They Fare in Terms of Accessibility for the Physically Disabled?
Phua, K.L. ; Chong, J.C. ; Elangovan, R. ; Liew, Y.X. ; Ng, H.M. ; Seow, Y.W.
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2014;10(1):43-50
Public and private hospitals in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor were evaluated in terms of their accessibility
for the physically disabled. The research hypotheses for this study included the following: (1) Both
types of hospitals are accessible for the physically disabled as measured by specifi c criteria but (2)
the degree of accessibility is higher in the case of private hospitals as compared to public hospitals.
A total of 23 private hospitals and 11 public hospitals in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor were invited to
participate in the study. The 5 private hospitals and 5 public hospitals that agreed were evaluated for
adequacy of facilities for the physically-disabled. For this purpose, 13 specifi c criteria were assessed
and scored for each hospital. These criteria were also grouped into 5 categories, namely, parking, toilet,
door and lift, corridor and ramp. Scores were compared between each hospital and then aggregated
and compared for private hospitals versus public hospitals. It was found that none of the 5 private
hospitals and 5 public hospitals studied satisfi ed 100% of the criteria evaluated. Looking at each
hospital individually, the overall scores range from 32% to 92% for the criteria set. Only 4 of the 10
hospitals in our sample achieved overall scores of 80% or higher in terms of the evaluation criteria
we used. With the exception of availability of ramps where public hospitals scored slightly higher ,for
most of the individual criterion, private hospitals scored higher than public hospitals. Looking at each
criterion across all hospitals, the scores range from 59.2% (adequacy of parking) to 85% (adequacy of
corridors). The median score obtained by private hospitals and by public hospitals for all 13 criteria
were analysed for any difference. The difference between private hospitals and public hospitals is not
statistically signifi cant (Mann-Whitney U = 6.5, p-value = 0.099). There is no signifi cant difference
between Kuala Lumpur/Selangor private and public hospitals in terms of accessibility for physically
disabled people. However, some hospitals are more accessible for the physically disabled than other
hospitals. These fi ndings indicate that there is room for improvement.
Disabled Persons
;
Health Care Facilities, Manpower, and Services
2.Some factors affecting the use of health care service and health counselling at basis level of Caugiay district, Hanoi city
Journal of Medical and Pharmaceutical Information 2004;0(8):23-26
This is a cross sectional study, including quantitative (household survey) and qualitative methods (indept- interview) on 699 people of 157 household living at Cau Giay district. Findings reveal that few people used medical care at the centers (4.3%), the self-medicated rate was highest (42.3%), then the rate of using private services: 27.7% and using services of higher referral levels: 16.7%... Quality and favorable of services, and level of illness... had major influenced to the choices of healthcare services
Health Care Facilities, Manpower, and Services
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Medical Staff
3.Where we are: socio-ecological and health profile of the Philippine LIFEcourse study in CARdiovascular disease epidemiology (LIFECARE) study sites.
Llanes Elmer Jasper B ; Nacpil-Dominguez Paulette D ; Sy Rody G ; Castillo-Carandang Nina T ; Punzalan Felix Eduardo R ; Reganit Paul Ferdinand M ; Gumatay Wilbert Allan G ; Sison Olivia T ; Ngalob Queenie G ; Velandria Felicidad V
Acta Medica Philippina 2014;48(2):47-55
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the socio-ecological and health profile of the Philippine LIFECARE study sites, its health care services and leading causes of mortality and morbidity.
METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study that recruited participants aged 20-50 years from Metro Manila and four provinces (Bulacan, Batangas, Quezon, Rizal). Study sites were characterized according to their geographical area, terrain and environmental profile, and available health care system.
RESULTS: 3,072 subejects were included, with male-to-female ratio of 1:1.3 and majority aged 30-50 years. Metro Manila was the most congested site. Two-thirds of the 62 villages (barangays) were rural, outside the town proper, and in lowlands. One-fourth were along coastal area. Almost all were accessible by public transportation. Majority have reduced forest cover, but were relatively safe from environmental hazards. Rural health units, hospitals, and professional health care workers were concentrated in Metro Manila. Leading cause of morbidity was respiratory tract infection, while cardiovascular diseases caused most of mortalities.
CONCLUSION: Study sites were mainly rural, outside the town proper and in lowlands, with available public transportation. There is an unequal distribution of health resources. Cardiovascular diseases is still the leading cause of mortality. The disparities in geographical access to health care play an important role in shaping human health.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Health Care Facilities, Manpower, and Services ; Delivery of Health Care ; Health Resources
4.Measuring stigma and discrimination towards people living with HIV among health care workers in a tertiary, government teaching hospital in the Philippines.
Sheryl Mae J LOPEZ ; Valerie R RAMIRO ; Evalyn A ROXAS
Acta Medica Philippina 2017;51(4):319-326
BACKGROUND:The incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the Philippines is increasing. HIV-related stigma in the health care setting is a known barrier to healthcare access for people living with HIV (PLHIV).
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to identify stigmatizing attitudes and practices towards PLHIV among healthcare workers in Philippine General Hospital.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 375 healthcare workers were recruited via convenience sampling. A standardized questionnaire developed by the Health Policy Project was used.
RESULTS: The study demonstrated concerns regarding transmission, particularly during drawing blood (87.1%),assisting in labor and delivery (82%), and dressing wounds (80.4%). Use of special infection-control measures (76.1%),wearing double gloves (72.8%), additional infection-control procedures during labor and delivery (72.2%), and wearing gloves during all aspects of patient care (70.2%) were reported as well. Perceptions such as the belief that pregnant women who are HIV positive must inform their families of their HIV status (82.1%), and that PLHIV engage in irresponsible behaviors (69.1%) and are promiscuous (66.4%) were also detected.
CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the presence of HIV-related stigma among healthcare workers in Philippine General Hospital.This finding could potentially catalyze the development of stigma-reducing measures which could hopefully translate to improved healthcare for PLHIV.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Hiv Infections ; Social Stigma ; Health Services Accessibility ; Social Discrimination ; Health Care Facilities, Manpower, And Services ; Hiv