1.Determination of the Contents of Neferine and Liensinine in Plumula Nelumbini by TLC Scanning
Pingsheng XU ; Guishan TANG ; Xinzhong LI
China Pharmacy 1991;0(04):-
OBJECTIVE:To establish the method for determining the contents of neferine and liensinine in plumula nelumbini.METHODS:Neferine and liensinine in plumula nelumbini were extracted by ultrasound method and determined by TLCs.RESULTS:The average recovery and relative standard deviation were(97.91?2.49)% and (99.28?3.22)%,respectively.The correlation coefficient were 0.996 and 0.999,respectively.CONCLUSION:The method,operated simply and attained the reliable results with good reproducibility,can be used to determine the contents of bioactive alkaloid in plumula nelumbini or other compound preparations.
2.Cone-beam CT imagine registration of lung cancer
Jun LIANG ; Tao ZHANG ; Yin ZHANG ; Yuan TANG ; Wenqing WANG ; Dongfu CHEN ; Qinfu FENG ; Zongmei ZHOU ; Minghui LI ; Guishan FU ; Liansheng ZHANG ; Jianrong DAI ; Lühua WANG
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2011;20(2):106-108
Objective To analyze the influencing factors of cone-beam CT (CBCT) imagine registration in lung cancer. Methods From Mar. 2007 to Dec. 2007, 20 patients with lung cancer were treated with IGRT. The imagines of CBCT were collected from 6 to 19 fractions during the patients' radiotherapy. To compare the difference of set-up errors between the two groups according to the distance from the lesion in lung to the centrum. At the same time, CBCT imagines from the first, middle and the last fraction of these patients' radiotherapy were registrated in bone and grey methods by four doctors. The difference of set-up errors between different doctors and registrated methods were compared. Results The mean values of set-up errors were <2 mm in the two groups without significant difference (x:-1.31mm vs 0. 10 mm (t=0. 07,P=0.554);y:1.24 mm vs 1.37 mm (t=0. 05,P=0. 652);z: - 1.88mm vs -1.26mm (t= -0. 12,P=0.321)). The mean values of set-up errors were < 1.3 mm in four doctors and registrated methods without significant difference, for bone registration,x: -0. 05 mm, -0. 01 mm,0. 05 mm, -0.12 mm and -1.31 mm ( F=-0.01,P=0.887) ;y:0.56 mm,0.35 mm,0.51 mm and 0.43 mm (F= -0.01,P=0.880);z: -1.16 mm, -1.20 mm, -0.88 mm and -1.03 mm (F= -0.04,P=0. 555 ), for grey registration ,x: -0.32 mm, -0.341 mm, -0.395 mm and - 0.37 mm(F=-0.01, P=0.874);y:0.34 mm,0.54 mm, -0.04 mm and 0.27 mm (F= -0.03,P=0.622);x:-1.12 mm,- 1.15 mm, - 1.13 mm and - 1.04 mm (F=0. 00,P=0. 812). Conclusions With the same registrated box and imagine quality, the location of the lesions in lung, registred methods and different doctors are not the influencing factors for CBCT imagine registration.
3.Image-guided radiotherapy for fifty-eight patients with lung cancer
Jun LIANG ; Tao ZHANG ; Wenqing WANG ; Yuan TANG ; Dongfu CHEN ; Yin ZHANG ; Liansheng ZHANG ; Minghui LI ; Guishan FU ; Jianrong DAI ; Luhua WANG
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2009;18(4):278-280
Objective To study the value of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in lung cancer. Methods From Mar. 2007 to Dec. 2007,58 patients with lung cancer were treated with IGRT. Set-up er-rors in each axial direction was calculated based on IGRT images of each patient. The change of GTV was e-valuated on both cone-beam CT and CT simulator images. Results Twenty-two patients with left lung cane-er,30 with right lung cancer,5 with mediastinal lymphanode metastasis and one with vertebra metastasis were included. The set-up error in x,y and z axes was (0.02±0.26) cm, (0.14±0.49) cm and ( -0. 13± 0.27) cm, respectively,while the rotary set-up error in each axis was -0.15°± 1.59°, -0.01°± 1.50° and 0.12°±1.08°, respectively. The set-up errors were siguifieantly decreased by using of IGRT. GTV movement was observed in 15 patients (25.9%) ,including 5 with left upper lung cancer. GTV moving to the anterior direction was observed in 9 patients,including 4 with]eft upper lung cancer. GTV reduced in 23 (44.2%) patients during treatment. Asymmetric GTV reduction of 22 lesions was observed,with a mean re-ductive volume of 4.9 cm3. When GTV began to shrink,the irradiation dose was 4 -46 Gy,with 20 -30 Gy in 9 patients. Conclusions The use of IGRT can significantly reduce set-up errors. GTV movement and reduction are observed in some cases. The time to modify the target volume needs to be further studied.
4.Comparison of the performance of two methods to determine set-up errors for DIBH patients with left sided breast cancer in radiotherapy
Tantan LI ; Jianghu ZHANG ; Yongwen SONG ; Yu TANG ; Shunan QI ; Fengyu LU ; Wei ZHANG ; Zengzhou WANG ; Xin FENG ; Shirui QIN ; Bin CHENG ; Bofei LIU ; Guishan FU ; Shulian WANG ; Jianrong DAI
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2020;29(4):278-282
Objective:To establish the basic procedures of the application of optical surface monitoring system (OSMS) in the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy for patients with left sided breast cancer and compare the performance of OSMS and cone-beam CT (CBCT) in the determination of the set-up errors of DIBH radiotherapy for patients with left sided breast cancer.Methods:Twenty patients with left sided breast cancer received DIBH radiotherapy. Through the registration of CBCT images with the planning CT images, and the registration of OSMS radiography images with the outer contour of the body surface, translational set-up errors and rotational errors were determined along the lateral-medial ( Rx), superior-inferior ( Ry) and anterior-posterior ( Rz) directions. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of the set-up errors determined by two methods, and Bland- Altman plot analysis was used to assess the coincidence of these two methods. Results:Two methods were positively correlated. The Rz volume was 0.84, 0.74 and 0.84 in the x, y and z directions, and 0.65, 0.41 and 0.54 in the Rx, Ry and Rz directions, respectively (all P<0.01). The 95% CI of agreement were within preset 5 mm tolerance (-0.37-0.42cm, -0.39-0.41cm, -0.29-0.49cm ) in x, y and z directions for two methods. The 95% CI of agreement were within preset 3 ° tolerance -2.9°-1.4°, -2.6°-1.4°, -2.4°-2.5°in Rx, Ry and Rz directions for two methods. The system errors of 20 patients with left sided breast cancer receiving DIBH radiotherapy were <0.18cm and the random errors were <0.24cm. Conclusions:OSMS is equivalent to CBCT in the determination and stimulation of set-up errors for patients with left sided breast cancer receiving DIBH radiotherapy. The combination of CBCT and OSMS is a safe and reliable method.