1.Influence of different implant diameters on implant-bone-interface stress distributions in zygomatic implant denture
Shunli CHU ; Yanmin ZHOU ; Weiyan MENG ; Guiping YUE
Journal of Jilin University(Medicine Edition) 2006;0(04):-
Objective To study the influence of different implant diameters on the implant-bone-interface stress distributions in zygomatic implant denture and illustrate the correlation between implant diameter and long-dated success rate of zygomatic implant denture.Methods Three-dimensional finite element model for maxilla and zygoma was established biomechanically in this study by spiral CT technique and finite element software technique,and zygomatic implant was simulated into the model in the first-maxillary-molar region.Zygomatic-implant-denture load cases concerning different implant diameters(3.5,4.0 and 5.0 mm) were designed and loaded vertically,obliquely.The implant-bone-interface stress distributions were analyzed by 3-D finite element method.Results The model could be observed from any angle,and had good geometric similarity compared with CT image.Stress peak values among these load cases with different diameters were compared,the load case with 3.5 mm diameter appeared the largest stress peak value,the load case with 4.0 mm diameter appeared the larger stress peak value and the load case with 5.0 mm diameter appeared the least stress peak value.As the implant diamater increased(3.5 mm→4.0 mm→5.0 mm),the compressive and tensive stress peak values of implant-bone interface in the maxillary alveolar ridge and the zygomatic area near maxillary sinus roof decreased gradually,the stress of implant-bone interface in the maxillary alveolar ridge was significantly larger than that of implant-bone interface in the zygoma area and compressive stress peak value was larger than tensive stress peak value.Conclusion The implant-bone-interface stress distributions tend towards uniformity as the implant diameter increases.Select wider-diameter implant as possible as the residual bone permitted clinically.
2.Study on Methodology Re-evaluation for Systematic Review/Meta-analysis of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Post-stroke Depression
Yue GUAN ; Guiping GUO ; Jingwen WANG ; Mingming WANG ; Fei MOU ; Yi QIAO ; Qiongge LI
China Pharmacy 2020;31(24):3036-3041
OBJECTIVE: To re-evaluate t he methodology quality of published systematic review/Meta-analysis of antidepressants in the treatment of post-stroke depression. METHODS :Retrieved from Cochrane Library ,PubMed,Embase, SinoMed,CNKI,Wanfang database ,VIP,CBM and other databases ,systematic review/Meta-analysis of antidepressants in the treatment of post-stroke depression were collected during the inception to Dec. 2019. After literature screening and data extraction , methodology quality of included literatures were evaluated by using the AMSTAR scale. RESULTS :A total of 33 systematic reviews/Meta-analysis were included ,involving 523 RCTs and 41 020 patients. Average score of AMSTAR methodological quality evaluation was 6.76. Citalopram ,duloxetine and paroxetine were effective for the therapy of post-stroke depression ,but the conclusions about the effectiveness among antide-pressants were not consistents. The ADR incidence of Paroxetine was low. It was not clear that sertraline and citalopram may improve the neurological function of patients. CONCLUSIONS :The methodological quality of systematic review/Meta-analysis of antidepressants in the treatment of post-stroke depression is medium ,and the conclusions about the effectiveness of antidepressants ,improvement of daily life ability and the recovery of neurological function are still controversial.