1.Protective action of bone marrow by intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Deyin ZHAI ; Yong YIN ; Guanzhong GONG
Journal of International Oncology 2012;39(2):152-154
More and more attention tend to the application of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment of malignant cancer.The accuracy of the radiotherapy is raising because of the increased radiosensitivity of bone marrow.Imaging modality quantified the distributions of bone marrow.,which could further reduce the volume to avoid.Bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy can reduce the pelvic bone marrow irradiation volume,which may reduce the probability of acute bone marrow inhibit.It is worthy of application widely.
2.Study the feasibility of kilovolt cone beam CT organs at risk contouring automatically using deformation registration in the radiotherapy of lung
Yong HOU ; Yong YIN ; Changsheng MA ; Guanzhong GONG
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2012;21(5):460-463
ObjectiveTo quantitative analysis the difference of organ contour using planning CT and kilovolt cone beam CT (KVCBCT) deformable registration.MethodsOne set planning CT image and ten sets of KVCBCT image of one patient were choose and total five patients.Organ contour were automatic outlined to using deformable registration.To compare the organ contours different of deformable registration (DR) and rigid registration (RR).Statistic analysis was executed with paired t-test for dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value and sensitiveness (SENS) value.ResultsThe DSC value of body,left,right lung,heart and spinal respectively:0.971 and 0.980 ( t =3.89,P =0.000 ),0.836 and 0.873 ( t =4.41,P =0.000),0.873 and 0.888 ( t =3.88,P =0.000 ),0.738 and 0.764 ( t =4.83,P =0.000 ),0.666 and 0.677 ( t =2.04,P =0.047 ).The SENS value:0.975 and 0.981 ( t =1.41,P =0.003 ),0.914 and 0.803(t=-6.88,P=0.000),0.926 and 0.800(t=-7.06,P=0.045),0.782 and 0.708(t=-2.50,P=0.040),0.625 and 0.796 (t =-9.09,P =0.000).ConclusionsRR is at a competitive disadvantage in terms of organ contour outline.The body,left and right lung that are used DR have advantage over the heart and spinal.
3.Comparison of dosimetry in radiotherapy for prophylactic cranial irradiation for prophylactic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer
Miaomiao LI ; Yinxia WANG ; Wei HUANG ; Yong YIN ; Guanzhong GONG ; Dongqing WANG ; Baosheng LI
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection 2013;33(5):493-496
Objective To compare the dosimetric differences among three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3D-CRT),intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)and RapidArc for prophylactic carnial irradiation(PCI)in small cell lung cancer(SCLC)patients.Methods Ten patients with SCLC were enrolled into this study.3D-CRT,9-field IMRT(IMRT)and double arc RapidArc plans were designed and optimized for each patient.The goal was to deliver 25 Gy to ≥ 95% of the planning target volume(PTV)while the same normal-tissue dose constraints were achieved.The dose distribution and conformal index (CI),homogeneity index(HI)of target volume,the maximum dose(D2 %),the minimum dose(D98 %),target coverage of PTV(V95 and V100),and Dmean and Dmax of organs at risk(OAR)were analyzed by using the dose volume histogram(DVH).The monitor units and delivery time were also evaluated.Results All plans met the clinical requirements.PTV dosimetric parameters(CI,HI,D2%,D98%,V95 and V100)of RapidArc and IMRT were superior to those of 3D-CRT with significant difference(P<0.05).The maximum doses to the optic nerves,brainstem and the mean dose to the parotid glands of the IMRT and RapidArc plans were all significantly lower than those of the 3D-CRT plan(P<0.05),while 3D-CRT plan provided the lowest maximum doses and mean dose of the lens and eyes(P<0.05).Compared with IMRT plan,no obvious advantage in PTV dosimetric parameters could be observed in RapidArc plans.In terms of organ sparing,no statistical difference was observed between IMRT and RapidArc plans.The number of monitor units for 3D-CRT,IMRT and RapidArc were 287.8,1388.8 and 346.6,respectively.Conclusions Compared with 3D-CRT,IMRT and RapidArc show better dosimetric quality.The 3D-CRT plan has a significantly lower dose on the lens and eyes,less MU and shorter delivery time than IMRT and RapidArc plans.
4.The comparison of two deformable registration algorithms and analysis of morphology of normal liver and tumor by breathing motion
Hui WANG ; Guanzhong GONG ; Hongjun WANG ; Yong YIN ; Dengwang LI ; Jie LU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2014;23(1):68-72
Objective To study the morphology of normal liver and tumors by breathing motion of hepatocellular carcinoma patients,through comparing the modified demons algorithm and FFD algorithm based on B-spline,and combing four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT).Methods The 4DCT images of 8 HCC patients were segmented into 10-series which were named CT0,CT10 … CT80,CT90 according to the respiratory phases,CT0 and CT50 are defined to be end-inhale and end-exhale respectively.CT50 was chosen as the reference image.We used the modified demons algorithm and FFD algorithm based on B-spline to deform the images.Linear interpolation was used in both mode 1 and mode 2.The normalized mutual information (NMI),Hausdorff distance (dH) and registration speed were used to verify the registration performance.Results The average NMI for the end-inhale and end-exhale images of 8 HCC patients after demons registration in mode 1 improved 4.75% with FFD algorithm based on B-spline(P =0.002).And the difference of dH after demons reduced 15.2% comparing with FFD model algorithm (P =0.02).In addition,demons algorithm has the absolute advantage in registration speed(P =0.036).Conclusions The breathing movement for deformation of normal liver and tumor targets is significant.These two algorithms can achieve the registration of 4DCT images and the modified demons registration can deform 4DCT images effectively.
5.The individual internal gross target volume for hepatocellular carcinoma: four-dimensional CT vs three-dimensional CT associated with active breathing control
Guanzhong GONG ; Yong YIN ; Jinhu CHEN ; Jinlong SONG ; Changsheng MA ; Dongping SHANG ; Jie LU ; Tonghai LIU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2011;20(6):517-520
Objective To research the feasibility of using three-dimensional CT (3DCT) associated with active breathing control (ABC) in determination of the individual internal tumor volume (ITV) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comparing the four-dimensional CT (4DCT).Methods After 4DCT scans of 15 HCC patients who had accepted TACE,completed the 3DCT scans associated with ABC in three ways of breathing:free breathing ( FB),end inspiration hold ( EIH),end expiration hold (EEH).4DCT images were sorted into 10 phases and the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were constructed.The GTVs were manually contoured on 4DCT and 3DCT images (labeled as GTV0,GTV10.….GTV90,GTVMIP,,GTVFB,GTVEIH and GTVEEH).GTV0…GTV90,GTV0 and GTV50,GTV0,GTV20 and GTV50,GTVEIH and GTVEEH were respectively merged into IGTV1,IGTV2,IGTV3,IGTV4.The volume and geometry displacement of GTVs and IGTVs were compared.Results All patients were compatible with the ABC technique and completed the CT scans in two ways.The motion of diaphragm measured between 4DCT and 3DCT images was not significantly different ( 1.39 cm and 1.39 cm,t =-0.02,P =0.983 ),it was similar to the volume difference among GTV0,GTV20,GTV50,GTVEIH,GTVEEH and GTVFB (56.4,54.6,55.5,55.6,55.2,59.7 cm3,F =0.01,P =1.000 ).The comparison result of volume difference among IGTV1,IGTV2,IGTV3,IGTV4 and GTVMIP (77.9,71.4,73.4,72.3 and 66.3 cm3,F =0.02,P =1.000)were similar to the differences of geometry displacement in x,y and z axial among them (F =0.48,0.04,0.02,P =0.750,0.997,0.999,respectively).Conclusion The application of 3DCT associated with ABC in determination of the individual IGTV for HCC is feasible and safe comparing to 4DCT.
6.Comparative study of the displacement of the selected clips in the cavity measured by orthogonal kilovoltage X-ray film in conditions of free breath and active breathing control for patients treated by external-beam partial breast irradiation
Jianbin LI ; Lei HAN ; Yingjie ZHANG ; Min XU ; Tingyong FAN ; Qian SHAO ; Guanzhong GONG
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2010;19(3):236-240
Objective To compare the displacements of the clips in the cavity measured with orthagonal kilovoltage (KV) X-my plain film in conditions of moderate deep inspiration breathing hold(mDIBH) and free breath (FB), and compare the margins from clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) based on the displacements. Methods Before radiotherapy, 2 and 5 sets of orthogonal KV plain film were respectively collected in mDIBH and FB group, then the automatic registration of the reconstructed KV plain film and DRR derived from the planning OF images was finished. In conditions of mDIBH and FB, the displacements of the selected clip at the same location in the different directions and of the different selected clips in the same direction were compared. The margins in three dimensional directions were calculated and compared in conditions of mDIBH and FB . Results In FB hold group, the difference of displacement in left-right (LR), cranial-caudal (CC) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were statistically significant between the clips at the cranial and caudal border of the cavity (9. 7 mm and 10. 6 nun (Z = -2. 12,P =0. 037) ,7. 3 mm and 8. 3 mm (Z = -2. 31 ,P=0. 041) ,15.5 mm and 16. 1 nun (Z = -2. 32,P = 0. 041)), but not statistically significant for the clips at the bottom and lateral P=0.814),15.7 mm and 16.5 mm (Z=-0.26,P=0.856)). The corresponding differences in the different directions were statistically significant (5.0 mm and 7. 8 mm(Z = -2. 31, P =0. 036), 5.0 mm and 9. 3 nun (Z= -2. 21,P=0. 021),7. 8 mm and9.3 mm (Z= -2. 11,P=0.041)). In FB group, the differences of the displacements of the four selected clips were statistically significant in CC and AP directions (7.3 mm and 8.4 mm (Z= -2.45,P=0.021), 15.5 mm and 16.5 mm (Z= -2.41,P= 0.043)), but not in LF direction (10.6 nun and 10.6 mm (Z= -0.24,P=0. 815)). In mDIBH group, the displacements in LF direction were statistically significant (4. 4 mm and 5.4 mm (Z = -2. 31, P = O. 031)), but not in CC and AP directions (8. 6 mm and 8.6 mm (Z =-0. 21, P = 0. 815), 10. 5 mm and 10. 8 mm (Z = -0. 27 ,P =0. 754)). There were statistically significant difference of the margins in LF and AP directions (9.7 mm and 5.0 mm (Z= -2.34,P=0.029),15.5 mm and 9.3 mm (Z= -2. 31,P= 0.021)), but not in CC direction (7.3 mm and 7. 8 mm (Z= -0.29,P =0.770)) between mDIBH and FB conditions. Conclusions The margins extended from CTV to PTV for EBPBI should be determined based on the respiratory status, border location and border direction.
7.Setup errors for the tumors in different parts of body with TomoTherapy
Ying TONG ; Yong YIN ; Jinhu CHEN ; Guanzhong GONG ; Lu FU ; Jiabing GU ; Pinjing CHENG
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection 2017;37(5):352-358
Objective To investigate the distribution rules of setup errors in different locations for tomotherapy.Methods 151 patients induding 53 head and neck tumors,45 thoracic tumors,20 abdominal tumors,and 33 pelvic tumors,who accepted tomotherapy were retrospectively analyzed in this study.The planning CT images of patients were obtained in simulation,and all patients underwent megavoltage CT (MVCT) scan before radiotherapy.And the setup errors were calculated by rigid registering MVCT images to planning CT images,and setup errors on + x(left),-x(right),+ y(in),-y(out),+z(ventral),-z (dorsal)axes were analyzed respectively.Results A total of 3 281 MVCT scans were performed on 151 patients,The setup errors on +x (left),-x(right),+y(in),-y(out),+z (ventral),-z (dorsal)axes were (1.61 ± 1.21),(1.76 ±2.11),(2.26 ± 1.74),(1.83 ± 1.47),(3.24±1.76) and (1.75 ± 1.61)mm for head and neck tumors;(2.43 ±1.88),(2.55 ± 1.92),(3.06 ±2.64),(3.90 ±2.91),(6.71 ±3.46) and (2.64 ±2.77)mm for thoracic tumors;(3.67±3.06),(2.37±1.77),(3.18±1.96),(3.98±3.01),(6.74±3.25) and (1.92±2.00) mm for abdominal tumors;(2.92 ±2.13),(2.17±1.68),(3.50±2.61),(3.72±2.66),(7.18± 3.43) and (1.92 ± 1.61)mm for pelvic tumors,respectively.The setup errors were different between +z and-z with statistically significant in all tumors (t =-4.119、-5.033、-3.763、-5.057,P < 0.05).The setup errors on + z direction of patients immobilized with thermoplastic mask were smaller than those immobilized with vacuum cushions for thoracic tumors (t =-2.357,P < 0.05).Conclusions The setup errors of head and neck tumors are less than other parts tumor in tomotherapy.The patients immobilized with thermoplastic mask can reduce the setup errors for thoracic tumors.The heterogeneity of setup errors on ventral-dorsal directions for the all parts of tumors should not be ignored.
8.Dosimetric difference in RapidArc planning for radiotherapy of multiple hepatic malignancy using different photon energy
Guanzhong GONG ; Yong YIN ; Deyin ZHAI ; Tonghai LIU ; Jinlong SONG ; Jie LU ; Jinhu CHEN ; Ruozheng WANG
Journal of International Oncology 2012;39(5):391-395
ObjectiveTo investigate the dosimetric difference in the application of RapidArc using 6 and 15 MV X-rays for radiotherapy of multiple hepatic malignancy.MethodsA total of 12 cases with multiple hepatic tumors ( primary 5 cases and secondary 7 cases) were selected.All patients underwent the three dimensional CT simulation in free breathing.For each patient,RapidArc plans with single or two 358° arcs using 6 or 15 MV X-rays were designed respectively,the prescription dose was 2Gy per fraction × 25 fractions.The dosimetric differences were compared among RapidArc plans.ResultsAll of RapidArc plans could meet the clinicalrequirement.There were no significant differences in the conformity index ( CI ),homogeneity index ( HI),the maximum dose and the minimum dose of PTV among RapidArc plans ( P > 0.05).All the CI could get to 0.91 and HI could get to 0.88.In the RapidArc plans with two 358° arcs,the Vs,V10,V15 of normal liver were higher than with single arc,while V20,V25,V30,V35,V40 were lower than with single arc.There were no significant differences in the different radiation dose of normal liver,stomach,duodenum and spinal cord among different plans ( P >0.05 ).The monitor units of RapidArc plans using 6 MV X-rays increased 12% compared to 15 MV averagely.CondusionThe 6 MV X-ray would be selected chiefly in the radiotherapy of multiple haptic tumor using RapidArc with whole arc(s).
9.Application of 4D-CT and deformable registration in assessment of dose accumulation in radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
Hua XU ; Guanzhong GONG ; Tonghai LIU ; Hong WEI ; Changsheng MA ; Yong YIN
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection 2015;35(5):349-352
Objective To explore the effect of respiration on dose accumulation for target volume and normal liver in radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while applying 4D-CT and deformable registration.Methods Nineteen HCC patients who had received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization were enrolled in this study.All patients underwent 3D-and 4D-CT simulation in free breathing.The 3D dose (Dose-3D) was calculated from the treatment planning designed on the 3D-CT image.The Dose-3D then was recalculated on ten phases of 4D-CT images respectively,and the end-inspiration and end-expiration doses were defined as Dose El and Dose-EE.The 4D dose (Dose-4D) was obtained by deforming and accumulating ten-phase doses of 4D-CT images on the end-expiration phase image.The dosimetric differences of planning target volume and normal liver were compared among Dose-3D,Dose-4D,Dose-EI and Dose-EE.Results The D99 and D95of planning target volume (PTV) in Dose-3D were higher than those of Dose-4D,Dose-Fl and Dose EE (x2 =32.75,26.31,P < 0.05).The conformal index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) in Dose-3D were better than those of Dose-4D,Dose-E1 and Dose-EE,in which CI decreased from 0.78 to0.63,0.60 and 0.57,while HI increased from 0.08 to 0.15,0.16 and 0.19 (x2 =37.80,31.86,P <0.05).No statistically significant differences were found in dosimetric indices of PTV between Dose-4D and Dose EI,Dose-EE,and between Dose-El and Dose-EE (P > 0.05).The mean dose (D),V5,V10,V20,V30 and V40 of normal liver were similar among four dose distributions (P > 0.05).Conclusions More objective and precise dose distribution for target volume and normal liver could be obtained by applying both 4D-CT and deformable registration,which is beneficial to accurately predicting the dosevolume indices of radiation-induced liver injury and offering more reliable evidence of escalation for target dose.
10.Evaluation of the feasibility of Gd-based contrast clearance difference to delineate subvolume target in radiotherapy for primary and metastatic brain tumors
Yinxing WANG ; Guanzhong GONG ; Ya SU ; Lizhen WANG ; Jie LU ; Yong YIN
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2021;30(2):151-155
Objective:To evaluate the feasibility of delineating subvolume target in radiotherapy for brain tumors using Gd-based contrast clearance difference.Methods:Twenty-six patients with malignant brain tumors were scanned with MRI. The first and second acquisitions of standard T 2-weighted images (T 2WI) and T 1-weighted images (T 1WI) were performed at 5 min and 60 min after injection of contrast agent. Delayed contrast extravasation (DCEM) MRI computed by Brainlab comprised regions of contrast agent clearance representing active tumors and regions of contrast accumulation representing non-tumor tissues. Based on T 2WI images, 14 patients with liquefaction necrosis were divided into group A, and 12 patients without liquefaction necrosis into group B, respectively. Then, gross target volume (GTV) was delineated on T 1WI images. Based on the GTV, active tumor (GTV tumor) and non-tumor regions (GTV non-tumor) were delineated on T 1WI-DCEM fusion images, while liquefaction necrosis (GTV liquefaction) and non-liquefaction (GTV non-liquefaction) were delineated on T 1-T 2WI fusion images. Finally, the differences between different subvolumes were compared by paired t-test. Results:In group A, the GTV non-liquefaction and GTV liquefaction were (13.65±18.15) cm 3 and (6.30±7.57) cm 3. The GTV tumor was (10.40±13.52) cm 3 and the GTV non-tumor was (9.55±14.57) cm 3. The GTV non-liquefaction was significantly increased by 16.3% on average compared with the GTV tumor ( P<0.05). The GTV non-tumor was significantly increased by 16.3% on average compared with the GTV liquefaction ( P<0.05). In group B, The GTV non-tumor was significantly reduced by 68.8% on average compared with the GTV tumor ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared with T 2WI, DCEM has advantages in identifying the liquefaction area and can clearly differentiate the subvolume of active tumors from non-liquefaction necrosis. DCEM provides evidence for guiding the delineation of subvolume in primary and metastatic brain tumors.