1.Evaluation of dengue IgA antibody and NS1 antigen rapid tests as early diagnostic tests for dengue virus infection
Christine Listyawati Irianto ; Grace Devota G. Go
Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal 2014;15(1):9-14
BACKGROUND: Dengue is a major health problem. The lack of data on the usefulness of rapid diagnostic tests for early detection of dengue has generated interest in determining their validity.
OBJECTIVES: This research aimed to determine the validity of dengue IgA antibody versus NS1 antigen test as rapid diagnostic tests for early detection of dengue using Hemagglutination Inhibition test (HI) as standard reference.
METHODOLOGY: This study included 51 pediatric patients being evaluated for dengue in a private hospital from March 01, 2012 to October 30, 2012. Paired serum samples from patients suspected of dengue and had fever of not more than seven days were examined. Initial blood samples were collected on the first day of consult and tested for dengue IgA antibody, dengue NS1 antigen, and dengue HI tests. Second blood samples for HI were collected seven days after the initial extraction
RESULTS: The 51 serum samples used in this study came from 29 males and 22 females. From these samples, sensitivity of dengue IgA antibody was 80% with 95% CI (70-90) while specificity was at 50% with 95% CI(34-64) while dengue NS1 antigen which showed sensitivity of 27% with 95% CI (15-39) and specificity of 67% with 95% CI (54-86). IgA rapid test demonstrated 71% positivity in detecting acute primary dengue infection and 82% for acute secondary infection. NS1 detected 43% of primary infection and 24% of secondary infection.
CONCLUSION: Dengue IgA antibody rapid test was more sensitive than NS1 antigen test for early diagnosis of dengue and had better performance in detecting primary and secondary dengue.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Adolescent ; Child ; Child Preschool ; Dengue-diagnosis, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures ; Immunoglobulin A ; Antigens ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests
2.Clinical profile and outcome of children with parapneumonic effusion
Grace Devota Gomez-Go ; Ma. Liza Gonzales ; Anna Ong-Lim
Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal 2012;13(1):15-28
Parapneumonic effusions frequently occur as complications of pneumonia. Data from developing countries is limited. The purpose of this paper is to review the epidemiological and clinical profile of parapneumonic effusions among children admitted in a tertiary government hospital.
Methodology: Medical records of 72 children diagnosed with parapneumonic effusions from 2005-to-2009 were obtained. Demography, clinical presentations, diagnostics, treatment modalities, outcomes, etiology and antibiotic susceptibilities were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Comparison of purulent effusion and empyema was done using parametric or non-parametric statistics, accordingly.
Results: There were 106 children discharged with a diagnosis of parapneumonic effusion. Of the 96 medical records available, 72 patients fulfilled the criteria for parapneumonic effusions. Only 53 patients submitted pleural fluid for analysis: 29 cases were empyema, while 24 cases were purulent effusion; mean age was 9.66 years. Fever (90.28%), cough (69.44%), and dyspnea (66.67%) were the most common clinical presentations. Forty-four patients underwent thoracentesis while 37 children had closed-tube thoracostomy. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) was the most commonly isolated organism from the pleural fluid cultures (9.26%) and blood cultures (6.25%). Patients with purulent effusion were treated with a combination of antibiotics and anti-TB meds (75%).Majority of patients with empyema were treated with antibiotics alone (79.31%). Earlier improvement and shorter hospital stay were observed among patients with purulent effusion.
Conclusion: Parapneumonic effusions occurred in 6.80% of hospitalized children with pneumonia; 54.72% of which were empyema and 45.28% were purulent effusion. MRSA was the most commonly isolated organism. Chest imaging, pleural fluid analysis and cultures, and blood cultures were important diagnostic procedures. The mainstays of treatment were medical, surgical or both, depending on the severity of effusion. Prompt diagnosis and management could account for favorable clinical outcomes.
Adolescent
;
Child
;
Child Preschool
;
Infant
;
Infant Newborn
;
PNEUMONIA
;
EMPYEMA
;
PLEURAL EFFUSION
3.Predictors of mortality among pediatric patients with Leptospirosis: A multicenter retrospective study
Rosalia Belen F. Bonus ; Grace Devota Go ; Joanne De Jesus ; Marxengel Asinas Tan ; Cecilia C. Maramba-Lazarte
Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal 2016;17(2):14-28
Objective:
Leptospirosis in children is one of the most common diagnostic dilemmas, hence this study was performed to determine the clinical profile, outcome and risk factors associated with mortality in patients seen at tertiary government hospitals from January 2008 to December 2012.
Methods:
A case-control retrospective study was done among admitted patients at UP-PGH, SLH, and RITM. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regressions were utilized.
Results:
Among the 404 leptospirosis cases included in the study, 94% were male, with 43% belonging to 16-18-year-old age group (age range 3 to 18 years old). A higher occurrence was noted during the rainy season and in Manila. Clinical findings include fever, abdominal pain, calf tenderness, vomiting and conjunctival suffusion. Significant correlation was noted in patients with jaundice (p-value 0.014; OR 6.293, CI 1.449-27.335), dyspnea (p-value 0.004; OR 7.880, CI 1.967-31.561) and cardiac abnormality (p-value 0.042; OR 15.343, CI 1.106-212.853). Abnormal laboratory findings include neutrophilia, azotemia, creatinemia, anemia, elevated bilirubin levels and thrombocytopenia. Prolonged prothrombin time was associated with poor outcome (p-value 0.004, OR 23, CI 2.79-189.67). Penicillin was the drug of choice given to 96.8%. 94.6% of cases who had oliguric renal failure were conservatively converted to non-oliguric type. 5.4% underwent peritoneal dialysis and survived. Inotropes were used in 93% of non-survivors. The case fatality rate was 3.5% with the cause of death mostly due to Weil’s disease. The average hospital stay among survivors was 6.8+3.3 days as compared with 1.8+1.9 days in non survivors. Shorter hospital stay (p-value 0.00; OR 3.514, CI 2.115-5.839), as well as inotropic support (p-value 0.035; OR 62.511, CI 1.33-2949.134), were associated with poorer outcome, but these findings can be attributed to late presentation of cases at the hospital for admission.
Conclusion
A5 year review of patients with leptospirosis showed that jaundice, dyspnea, cardiac abnormality and prolonged prothrombin time were predictive of mortality.
Leptospirosis
4.Clinical practice guidelines on leptospirosis in children 2019
Maria Anna P. Bañ ; ez, M.D ; Melba V. Marasigan, M.D. ; Ma. Liza Antoinette M. Gonzales, M.D., MSc ; Grace Devota G. Go, M.D. ; Fatima I. Gimenez, M.D. ; Mary Antonette C. Madrid, M.D. ; John Andrew T. Camposano, M.D. ; Jennifer M. Nailes, M.D., MSPH ; Ma. Lucila M. Perez, M.D., MSc
Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal 2023;24(1):5-69
Executive Summary
Leptospirosis is a disease prevalent mostly in tropical and subtropical countries. Its potential to be a concerning
problem emerges with the onset of the rainy season, as flooding and heavy rainfall facilitate disease epidemics. Among
those at risk of contracting the disease are field workers, veterinarians, sewer workers, military personnel and those
who swim or wade in contaminated waters.
In the absence of an existing evidence-based guideline for the pediatric age group, this first edition hopes to
standardize approach to diagnosis, antibiotic management, and prevention of leptospirosis. The intended users are
primary care physicians, family medicine physicians, pediatricians, and other healthcare workers involved in the
management of leptospirosis in children.
Ten priority questions were identified by a group of experts composed of an oversight committee, a guideline
writing panel, and a technical review committee. The GRADE methodology was used to determine the quality of
evidence of each recommendation. The draft recommendations (summarized below) were finalized after these were
presented to and voted on by a panel of stakeholders.