OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the most accurate method to use for the diagnosis of membrane rupture as well as to compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of such different methods.

METHODOLOGY: This prospective, non-randomized, descriptive study included 100 subjects, 50 each for the control group or women with intact membranes documented by history and physical examination, and gold standard group or women with ruptured membranes documented by history and pooling of amniotic fluid on speculum examination. Endocervical samples for control group (no pooling) and vaginal/posterior fornix samples for gold standard group (with pooling of fluid) were obtained from each patient used to test for determination using Actim^TM PROM test kit, ferning test, and pH testing using litmus paper.

RESULT: Ferning's test, Litmus paper test and Actim^TM PROM test have sensitivity of 30%, 44% and 74%, respectively specificity of 100%, 96%, 96% and respectively; PPV of 100%, 91.7% and 94.9% respectively; and NPV of 58.8%, 63.2% and 78.7% respectively. Actim PROM test kit was noted to be superior in terms of accuracy, followed by Litmus paper test, and lastly, by Ferning test as shown by the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve.

CONCLUSIONS: Actim^TM PROM test was noted to have the highest accuracy, as evidenced by the result of ROC curve, with the highest probability of testing positive in patients with true rupture of membranes, and with the highest Kappa statistic value or lowest probability of having interobserver variability.

Human ; Female ; Adult ; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture-diagnosis ; Preterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes

Dinoprostone ; Pregnant Women ; Cervical Ripening