1.Lessons Learned from a Fulminant Case of Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: Past Medical History Misleads the Diagnosis and Intra-Arterial Milrinone Offers Diagnostic Utility
Paul J ALAPATT ; Ajay PANWAR ; Gigy Varkey KURUTTUKULAM ; Kaushik SUNDAR
Neurointervention 2021;16(1):78-82
A 34-year-old post-partum female having dermatomyositis developed headache and became comatose after a seizure episode. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain showed a massive left ganglio-capsular bleed for which decompressive surgery was done. Computed tomographic angiography showed multiple foci of narrowing and irregularities in distal cerebral vessels. In view of dermatomyositis, the diagnosis of vasculitis was considered and pulse therapy of intravenous methylprednisolone was started. The patient, however, showed no improvement and developed new brain infarcts. She was subsequently taken up for a diagnostic cerebral angiography which showed multifocal severe narrowing in bilateral major cerebral arteries. These angiographic abnormalities showed excellent reversibility to intra-arterial milrinone and hence, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) was diagnosed. Normal angiographic findings in the first week do not rule out the disease and a repeat angiography should be considered if the clinical suspicion of the RCVS is high. Intra-arterial milrinone has a high diagnostic utility.
2.Tenecteplase versus alteplase (TENVALT): A study comparing two thrombolytic agents in acute ischemic stroke
Kaushik Sundar ; Lomesh Bhirud ; Ajay Panwar ; Jerin Jose Cherian ; Eldho Mathew Paul ; Gigy Varkey Kuruttukulam
Neurology Asia 2019;24(3):203-208
Background & Objective: The Indian data comparing the efficacy and safety outcomes of tenecteplase
and alteplase in acute ischemic stroke is scarce. We aimed to compare the outcomes of two agents in
an Indian population. Methods: TENVALT study was a single centre, retrospective study. Patients aged
18 years or older with acute ischemic stroke were included in this study if they presented within 3
hours of symptom onset and had a deficit with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score
> 4, had a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 2 or less before the stroke onset and had no evidence of
hemorrhage on non-contrast computed tomography of brain. A good functional recovery (mRS score
of 0-2) at the end of three months was defined as the primary efficacy outcome. The development of
symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was considered as the primary safety outcome. Results: A total
of 120 patients (alteplase, n=65; tenecteplase, n=55) underwent stroke thrombolysis during this study.
The mean age of the presentation in tenecteplase group was 66.6 years and in alteplase group was
62.5 years. Most of the study subjects were males in both the groups (tenecteplase, 78.2%; alteplase,
61.5%). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity in both the groups (tenecteplase, 67.3%;
alteplase, 76.9%). Median mRS score at 3 months of follow up was 2 in tenecteplase and 1 in alteplase group; however, the difference between the total number of patients having good functional recovery (mRS 0-2) in the two groups was not statistically significant (tenecteplase 74.5 vs alteplase 87.7%, P=0.09). The total number of patients who had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was comparable between the two groups (tenecteplase, 5.5%; alteplase, 6.2%). Conclusion: Tenecteplase appears to be an efficacious alternative to alteplase for stroke thrombolysis and may be better suited to developing countries considering its low cost and ease of administration.