1.Clinical studies of the cefazedone sodium in treatment of respiratory tract bacterial infections
Jing YANG ; Gengzhi GE ; Hongyuan WANG
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine 2010;33(19):12-14
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the cefazedone sodium in treatment of respiratory tract bacterial infections. Methods Single-blind randomized control trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefazedone sodium in treatment of respiratory tract bacterial infections, and cefazolin sodium as the controlled one. Patients in trial group (using cefazedone sodium, 35 patients) and control group (using cefazolin sodium, 37 patients) were all intravenously administered at the same doses of 2 g, every 12 hours for 5 to 14 days. A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the studies, 34 in trial group and 32 in control group, with 1 excluded and 5 withdrawn. Safety assessment was conducted in 71 patients. Results In trial group and control group, the total cure rates for respiratory tract infections were 91.18% (31/34) and 78.12%(25/32), and the general bacterial eradication rates were 80.00% (20/25) and 84.00% (21/25). The adverse drug reaction rates were 22.86 %(8/35) and 16.67% (6/36),there was no significant difference (P > 0.05 ). Conclusion Cefazedone sodium is a safe and effective antibiotic in the treatment of acute respiratory tract bacterial infections.
2.Multi-center clinical studies on pazufloxacin sodium chloride injection in treatment for acute bacterial infections
Jing YANG ; Gengzhi GE ; Tian XIA ; Baoyuan CHEN ; Xiaowen HAN ; Bing LIU ; Lixian HE ; Xiaoqiang DING ; Zhongyi HUANG ; Zhongmin QIU ; Jun MA ; Ce SHEN ; Niansong WANG
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners 2008;7(1):19-21
Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of locally-produced pazufloxacin mesilate sodium chloride injection in the treatment of bacterial infections of respiratory and urinary tract.Methods A multi-center double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out to evaluate efficacy and safety of pazufloxacin mesilate sodium chloride in treatment for acute bacterial infection, as compared to those of levofloxacin hydrochloride and glucose injection as control treatment.A total of 244 patients with acute bacterial infection of respiratory and urinary tract were enrolled in the studies.120 in trial group and 120 in control group, with four withdrawals.Pazufloxacin mesilate and levofloxacin were administered intravenously by drip at a dose of 300 mg and 200 mg, every 12 hours for 7 to 14 days for trial and control groups, respectively.Resuits Overall efficacy of pazufloxacin mesilate was 77.0 percent and 93.5 percent in treatment for acute bacterial infections of respiratory and urinary tract.respectively, and that of levofloxacin was 80.6 percent and 89.6 percent, respectively.Overall bacterial clearance rate WaS 91.5 percent for pazufloxacin mesilate, 89.6 percent for respiratory tract infection and 94.1 percent for urinary tract infection, respectively.and 93.4 percent for levofloxacin, 97.3 percent for respiratory tract infection and 89.7 percent for urinary tract infection, respectively.No significant difference in adverse drug reactions between the two groups(P>0.05)was found, with 4.88 percent and 7.44 percent for trial and control groups, respectively.Conclusions Pazufloxacin mesilate sodium chloride injection produced locally is a safe and effective antibiotic in treatment for acute infections of respiratory and urinary tract.