A risk factor increases a person’s susceptibility to developing a disease. This can be a particular patient characteristic (e.g., obesity for heart disease), patient behavior (e.g., cigarette smoking for lung cancer), or a specific drug intervention (e.g., steroid intake for myopathy). Observational studies like case-control or cohort study designs are commonly used when evaluating the harmful effect of an exposure. Family and community medicine practitioners should always take the opportunity to advice patients regarding these risk factors to promote wellness and enhance primary care.
Risk Factors ; Cohort Studies ; Case-Control Studies

Post-COVID condition is the presence of new, recurring, or ongoing signs and symptoms for greater than four weeks after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Persistent headache as a neurologic sequalae of COVID-19 infection is a common prolonged symptom with limited characterization in the literature. This was a case of a 27-year-old female diagnosed with mild COVID-19 who presented with fever, colds, fatigue, headache, decreased hearing, sore throat, dry cough, pleuritic chest pain, anosmia, ageusia, myalgia, and severe low back pain. Headache was described as remitting, frontally located, squeezing and moderate to severe in pain intensity. She was admitted in a tertiary COVID referral hospital for 8 days and was managed supportively. On the 10th day of illness, symptoms had resolved except for an on and off headache. The residual recurrent headache lasted for more than 5 months after being tested negative for SARSCOV2 on repeat reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The possible pathophysiologic mechanisms for neurologic manifestations and prolonged headache were hypoxia, endothelial damage through angiotensin converting enzyme receptor, and cytokine reactions. The characteristics of the symptoms remained unclear despite the proposed mechanisms for prolonged headache among COVID-19 patients.
Headache ; COVID-19 ; Common Cold

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 infection can present in various clinical forms. Anosmia has been significantly associated with a positive RT-PCR, but it usually appears after four days and has also been observed among COVID-19 negative patients. Knowledge on the clinical course of COVID-19 can guide decision-making on screening, diagnostic testing, and quarantine/isolation procedures.

To describe the clinical course of healthcare workers (HCWs) with COVID-19-related exposure, symptoms, differential diagnoses, and time to return to work clearance.

This was a cross-sectional study involving HCWs diagnosed as COVID-19 contacts/suspects between April 2020 and April 2021. Information on demographics, time elapsed between clinical events, outcomes, and final diagnoses were collected from hospital records. Categorical data was presented in frequencies and percentages, while numerical data were reported as range and median values.

There were 4755 consultations for COVID-19-related symptoms or exposure that were included in the study. Symptoms developed at a median of one day post-exposure. Consultation was at two days following symptom onset or four days after exposure. RT-PCR was done on the day of consult. Symptoms resolved after a median of six days. Return to work (RTW) was seven days from consult. Common presenting symptoms were respiratory (56.71%) and systemic (34.04%). COVID-19 was positive in 13.79% of consults. Almost all HCWs recovered (99%) as outpatient (88%). Differential diagnoses were usually other respiratory infections (8.60%) and allergic rhinitis (2.37%).

The clinical course for HCWs who consulted for COVID-19-related symptoms or exposure lasted for two weeks from symptom onset or exposure until clearance for work resumption. The most common symptoms were respiratory and systemic in nature. Recovery was noted after six days. The most common alternative diagnoses for COVID-19 negative cases were respiratory infection and allergic rhinitis.

Background: In a low resource setting, strategies to optimize Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies are being observed. Alternative protective measures were identified to protect health care personnel during delivery of care Objective: To provide list of recommendations on alternative protective equipment during this Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic Methodology: Articles available on the various research databases were reviewed, appraised and evaluated for its quality and relevance. Discrepancies were rechecked and consensus was achieved by discussion. Recommendations: The use of engineering control such as barriers in the reception areas minimize the risk of healthcare personnel. Personal protective equipment needed are face shields or googles, N95 respirators, impermeable gown and gloves. If supplies are limited, the use of N95 respirators are prioritized in performing aerosol-generating procedures, otherwise, surgical masks are acceptable alternative. Cloth masks do not give adequate protection, but can be considered if it is used with face shield. Fluid-resistance, impermeable gown and non-sterile disposable gloves are recommended when attending to patients suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Used, soiled or damaged PPE should be carefully removed and properly discarded. Extended use of PPE can be considered, while re-use is only an option if supplies run low. Reusable equipment should be cleaned and disinfected every after use Conclusion In supplies shortage, personal protective equipment was optimized by extended use and reuse following observance of standard respiratory infection control procedures such as avoid touching the face and handwashing. The addition of physical barriers in ambulatory and triage areas add another layer of protection
Personal Protective Equipment ; Triage

This case series described four healthcare workers with exposure to patients and co-workers, who were potential or confirmed cases of COVID-19. They had negative nasopharyngeal swab reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests at different time points and had zero IgG antibodies on VITROS Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody test prior to CoronaVac inoculation on March 1, 2021. The levels of antibody titers, which showed increasing then declining trends of immunoglobulins, were measured at different time points. Although the antibody levels are not proof of immunity against SARS-CoV-2 and the protective quantity is yet to be determined, the titers are evidence that vaccines do elicit an immune response and may have a role in the fight against infection
Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Antibodies, Viral ; Immunoglobulin G

BACKGROUND

Medical records provide a repository of patient information, physical examination, laboratory findings, and the outcomes of interventions. The completeness of data contained in the electronic medical record (EMR) is an important factor leading to health service improvement. Quality assurance (QA) activities have been utilized to improve documentation in electronic medical records.

To determine the effectiveness of QA interventions (feedback, workshop, and random monitoring system) in improving completeness of data entries in the EMR of resident physicians for COVID-19 teleconsultations.

This was a before-and-after study involving EMR entries of physician trainees on health care workers (HCWs) from March to October 2022 of the COVID-19 pandemic. A chart audit was conducted against a checklist of criteria for three months before and after the interventions. QA interventions included the provision of feedback on the results of the initial chart review; conducting a QA workshop on setting of standards, chart audit, data encoding, analysis, and presentation; and random monitoring/feedback of resident charting. The change in the level of completeness from pre- to post-intervention was computed, and the percentage of charts meeting the minimum standard of 90% completeness was likewise determined.

A total of 362 and 591 chart entries were audited before and after the interventions. The average percentage of completeness of medical records during initial consultation improved from 83% to 95% (p>0.05). The documentation of the reason for seeking consultation significantly increased from < 1% to 84%. The reporting of past exposure and level of risk decreased to 89% (p=0.001) in the initial consult and 12% (p=0.001) in the fit-to-work, respectively. Majority of the criteria for work clearance improved after the intervention. However, the average completeness of entries did not reach 90% post-intervention for fit-to-work consultations.

Feedback, quality assurance workshop, and random monitoring of electronic medical records are effective in increasing documentation practices for the chief complaint and dates of illness duration but showed non-significant increasing trend on overall percentage of EMR completeness for COVID-19 teleconsultations.

Background. Workplace or employees’ clinics play a vital role in disease outbreaks as there could be an influx of sick personnel. Processes and patient flows during pandemics should be documented to identify good practices and sources of operational inefficiencies. Objective. To describe the patient flow, health delivery processes, and areas for improvement at the UPHS during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic from May to June 2020. Methods. This was a cross-sectional study involving patient flow analysis of processes at the employees’ clinic of the University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital. The study was divided into two major components: clinic process time measurement and process flow mapping. Data collection involved time elements and narrative descriptions of good practices and problems in the process flow. Results. The UPHS staff attended to 1,514 employees’ visits during the 15 working days from May to June 2020. The total UPHS service time from arrival to end of consultation of an employee with a COVID-19-related concern was an average of 1 hour 3 minutes (SD±39 minutes) with a mean total waiting time of 46 minutes (SD±37 minutes). Good practices identified were personnel flexibility in doing other tasks, good communication, and infection control measures. Areas for improvement included symptom screening, implementation of physical distancing, and disinfection practices. Conclusion. The process flows in the UPHS clinic consisted of COVID-19 related consultations, non-COVID-19 related concerns, and swabbing services. Good communication, staff flexibility, infection control measures, and leadership were identified as good practices. Occasional lapses in symptom screening at triage, physical distancing among employees in queuing lines, and inconsistent disinfection practices were the areas for improvement.
Humans ; COVID-19 ; Physical Phenomena ; Delivery of Health Care

BACKGROUND

Infection from SARS-CoV-2 have transient and long-term complications. Persistent symptoms postrecovery with perceptions of overall physical and mental health status are crucial information to construe on follow-up care.

To describe the clinical profile, general, and mental health outcomes of hospital staff who recovered from COVID-19 at follow-up 12 weeks or more post-convalescent.

This was a cross-sectional study on follow-up of hospital staff who recovered from COVID-19. Study population included staff or health care workers of a COVID-19 referral tertiary hospital, who had laboratoryconfirmed COVID-19 via RT-PCR. Informed consent was obtained through phone calls and google forms. Data collection was through a self-administered, on-line google form or voice-call interviewer-assisted questionnaire. Analysis was done with Stata 17 using frequencies, proportions, and cross-tabulations.

Persistent symptoms reported several months post-recovery from COVID-19 included fatigue (25%), difficulty of breathing (23%), muscle weakness (16%), nasal congestion (12%), cough (10%), sore throat (5%), anosmia (3%), and ageusia (2%). Symptoms of physical and mental fatigue post-COVID-19 were reported by 25% (N = 93) with extreme fatigue reported by four staff. Fifteen percent (N = 57) reported that they feel that their workload or schedule needed modification after recovery. Feelings of isolation, depression, and anxiety were the most common mental health issues reported. Screening using validated tools showed that depressive symptoms were present in 45% (N = 145) and anxiety in 18% (N = 53).

Healthcare workers who recovered from COVID-19 for at least 12 weeks or more described their health status as comparable to their overall health one year before the infection. Physical and mental health symptoms reported 12 weeks post-recovery include fatigue, breathlessness, anxiety, and depression and were described in various levels of severity.

Background. Telemedicine provides access to health care services during pandemics. It can be utilized to screen asymptomatic persons, follow up close contacts of confirmed cases, monitor individuals with symptoms, conduct specialty consultations, and offer health services to patients during pandemics. Objective. To describe the telemedicine processes, good practices, and areas for improvement in the University of the Philippines Health Service (UPHS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. This was a cross-sectional study to document telemedicine processes in UPHS. All teleconsultations of employees and students of Philippine General Hospital (PGH) and UP Manila (UPM) during the two-week study period in October 2020 were included. Quantitative data was collected from different modes of patient entry into the UPHS telemedicine services: email, Online Consultation Request and Appointment (OCRA) System, and phone hotlines. Qualitative information was gathered as narrative descriptions of observations in the clinic’s service delivery areas. A focus group discussion was also conducted to illustrate the different steps of the pathway used for telemedicine. Results. The telemedicine services of UPHS consisted of virtual triage, COVID-19/non-COVID-19 consultation, and telemonitoring. The UPHS virtual triage received patient concerns through OCRA or the hotline numbers. On the other hand, the COVID-19 teleconsultation service provided care to employees and students who contacted the clinic regarding symptoms or exposure via email. The non-COVID-19 service had teleconsultation for patients with other medical concerns. Coordination among staff and presence of a consultant were identified as good practices, while the areas for improvement include the lack of written protocols in issuing fit-to-work clearance for difficult cases and the optional use of OCRA for UPHS consult. Conclusion. Telemedicine services at the UPHS included tele-triaging, teleconsultations, and telemonitoring with use of phone calls, short messaging service (SMS), emails, and OCRA. Timely coordination, on-site duty consultants, and use of technology were identified as good practices. Lack of protocols and inconsistent OCRA use are areas for improvement.
Pandemics ; Telemedicine ; Ambulatory Care Facilities

Background: Local government units conduct community – based responses to control spread of COVID-19 infection. Initiatives include city-wide disinfecting operations on streets and establishments, and mist spraying outside houses, vehicles, and even directly on persons. Objective: To provide a list of recommendations on the different disinfection strategies applicable for use in the community Methodology: Articles and guidelines about community disinfection were searched in various research databases. All evidencebased recommendations were reviewed, appraised, evaluated and summarized Recommendations: General disinfection in households and community recommends use of diluted bleach solution of 75ml Sodium hypochlorite in 3.8L or 1 gallon of water (1000ppm). It is recommended to clean and disinfect frequently touched surfaces such as tables, doorknobs, light switches, handles, desks, toilets, faucets, sinks and electronics. In disinfecting local quarantine facilities, all surfaces must be regularly cleaned using damp cleaning cloth and mops. Ethyl alcohol (70%) is used for small surfaces and well-ventilated spaces while diluted household bleach is used for surface disinfection. Spraying or fogging with ethyl alcohol or bleach disinfectant may be hazardous and has no proven benefit on disease prevention and control Conclusion The use of properly diluted household disinfectant solution for direct surface cleaning is an effective infection control measure in the community setting. Available evidence, however, recommends against the use of spraying, misting or fogging
Coronavirus ; Infection Control