1.Expression of XIAP mRNA and Survivin mRNA in non-small cell lung cancer and their clinical significance
Jinming ZHAO ; Tiehua RONG ; Jianhua FU ; Zhaohong WU ; Gangdong CHEN ; Gefei WANG
Cancer Research and Clinic 2010;22(1):35-37
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of the expression of XIAP mRNA and Survivin mRNA in non-small cell lung cancer and their relationship. Methods RT-PCR was used to evaluate the expression of XIAP mRNA and Survivin mRNA in 59 cases of NSCLC and corresponding normal tissues.Results There was a significant difference in XIAP mRNA expression in primary lung and corresponding normal tissues (61.0 % vs 30.5 %, P<0.05), whereas there were no significant correlation between the XIAP mRNA expression and gender, age, smoking history, histological subtype, T stage, lymph node metastatic status and TNM stage. There was a significant difference in Survivin mRNA expression in primary lung and corresponding normal tissues (81.4 % vs 23.7 %, P<0.05), whereas there were no significant correlation between the Survivin mRNA expression and gender, age, smoking history, histological subtype, T stage, lymph node metastatic status and TNM stage. Conclusion The significant difference of XIAP mRNA and Survivin mRNA expression between the tumor and corresponding normal tissues implies they might play important roles in the carcinogenesis and progress of NSCLC and might become marker for the diagnosis and target for treatment of NSCLC.
2.Value of strain means of quantitative parameters in diagnosis of liver fibrosis.
Lifeng ZHOU ; Shuzhen CONG ; Shufang PEI ; Yuefeng CHEN ; Ruili ZHOU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2014;34(5):740-742
OBJECTIVETo explore the value of the strain means of the quantitative parameters of organization diffusion in determining the degree of liver fibrosis.
METHODSA total of 130 patients with chronic hepatitis B were examined for quantitative analysis of organization diffusion before liver biopsy to analyze the performance of the strain means in liver fibrosis of different degrees. All the cases were confirmed by pathology.
RESULTSThe strain means differed significantly between different stages of liver fibrosis. Using the best cut-off values of 116.2, 111.4, 101.6 and 97.5 for diagnosis of S≥1, S≥2, S≥3 and S=4, the diagnostic sensitivities were 91.2%, 90.8%, 95.8% and 89.7%, with specificities of 90.4%, 98.6%, 93.8% and 95.6% and accuracies of 90.6%, 94.7%, 95.5% and 91.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONThe strain mean can provide specific numerical indicators to determine the degree of liver fibrosis.
Biopsy ; Diffusion ; Hepatitis B, Chronic ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis ; diagnosis ; Sensitivity and Specificity