Objective To investigate the effects of radical prostatectomy on the overall survival (OS)and tumor-specific survival in prostate cancer(PCa)patients aged 75 years and older.Methods Clinical data of patients aged 75 and older with localized PCa from Surveillance,Epidemiology,and End Results(SEER)Database from 2004 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 17 899 cases of PCa undergoing radical prostatectomy and 3 648 cases of PCa without surgery in this study.The OS and prostate cancer-specific survival(PSS)were compared between the surgery group and the nonsurgery group.Results For 75-79-year-old patients with high-risk localized PCa,the OS and PSS in the surgery group were better than in the non-surgery group (OR =1.49,95 ％ CI:1.22 ～ 1.82,P ＜ 0.01;OR=1.43,95％CI:1.09～2.04,P＜0.05).For patients aged 75-79 years with low-risk PCa and patients aged 80 years and older with low-,middle-,or high-risk PCa,the OS was worse in the surgery group than in the non-surgery group(OR =0.54,95％CI:0.38～0.76,P＜0.01;OR =0.47,95％CI:0.34～0.66,P＜0.01;OR =0.58,95％CI:0.44～0.78,P＜0.01;OR =0.59,95％CI:0.51 ～0.68,P＜0.01).For patients aged 75-79 years with low-or medium-risk PCa and patients aged 80 years and older with medium-risk PCa,there was no statistical difference in PSS between the surgery and non-surgery groups(P＞0.05).Conclusions Age limits for prostatectomy should be extended as a result of increasing average life expectancy.Patients aged 75-79 years with high-risk PCa can be considered for surgical treatment,while it should not be recommended for patients aged 75-79 years with low-or medium-risk localized PCa or aged more than 80 years.Many factors should be considered in making treatment decisions for prostate cancer.

Despite the deepening of research on breast cancer,improving of treatment techniques,there are still many patients will appear local-regional recurrence after surgery.For patients with local recurrence after radical mastectomy,according to whether the postoperative radiotherapy performed,prognosis and treatment protocols are absolutely different.As for patients with local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery,more and more studies have shown that lumpectomy (secondary breast conserving surgery) combined with brachytherapy can achieve a similar effect with radical surgery in recent years,so it is a worth considering treatment protocol.

Objective:To investigate the best neutralization ratio of protamine and heparin during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(OPCABG) by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of heparin residue after OPCABG.Methods:From July 2018 to January 2019, 112 patients undergoing elective OPCABG were included in this study. The patients’ whole blood was drawn at 2 time points, including before entering operating room and entering intensive care unit, to receive thrombelastography(TEG) and heparinase-modified thromboelastography(hmTEG) . Conventional coagulation indexes such as activated coagulation time(ACT) were also detected. All the patients were divided into 3 groups, the non-heparin residue group(30 cases), heparin residue group 1(42 cases) and heparin residue group 2(40 cases) according to the laboratory results of TEG, hmTEG and ACT. We observed the dosage of each group of protamine and heparin, as well as the ratio of heparin and protamine. The changes of R time in TEG and ACT between 3 groups were analyzed and compared. Postoperative chest tube drainage at postoperative 12 h and 48 h, cTnI peak value, incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction(MI), incidence of reoperation and poor wound healing, amount of blood loss and transfusion, and acute renal injury were compared between the 3 groups.Results:No significant trio-group differences existed in basic clinical characteristics(all P>0.05). Postoperative R(CKH)time was similar in the 3 groups( P>0.05). Comparing with heparin residue group 1 and heparin residue group 2, the ACT after protamine neutralizing heparin and postoperative R time were decreased, the dosage of protamine, ratio of heparin and protamine, cTnI peak value were increased in the non-heparin residue group( P<0.05). Comparing with heparin residue group 2, the dosage of heparin, postoperative chest tube drainage at postoperative 12h and 48h, amount of blood transfusion and transfusion probability were significantly decreased in non-heparin residue group( P<0.05), but compared with group 1 of heparin residue, there was no significant difference in the above indexes( P>0.05). The perioperative myocardial infarction, incidence of reoperation and poor wound healing, postoperative acute renal injury and time of in ICU stay showed no significant differences between the 3 groups( P>0.05). Conclusion:Moderate heparin residue after OPCAB suggests that it has myocardial protective effect, and does not significantly increase the risk of bleeding. A large number of heparin residues can affect the coagulation function and lead to bleeding tendency, increase the amount of blood loss and transfusion. It is reasonable to make ACT after protamine neutralize heparin higher than the level of ACT before operation, and not higher than 20% of the level before operation.

Objective    To explore the relationship between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and blood glucose fluctuations after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and adverse events in non-diabetic patients, thus providing theoretical support for intensive preoperative blood glucose management in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Methods    A total of 304 patients undergoing CABG with or without valvular surgery from October 2013 to December 2017 were enrolled in this prospective, single-center, observational cohort study. We classified them into two different groups which were a low-level group and a high-level group according to the HbA1c level. There were 102 males and 37 females, aged 36–85 (61.5±9.5) years in the low-level group, and 118 males and 47 females aged 34–85 (63.1±9.4) years in the high-level group. The main results were different in hospital mortality and perioperative complications including in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, sternal incision infection, new stroke, new-onset renal failure and multiple organ failure. To assess the effects of confounding factors, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used. Results     Postoperative blood glucose fluctuation was more pronounced in the high-level group than that in the low-level group before admission [0.8 (0.6, 1.2) mmol/L vs. 1.0 (0.8, 1.8) mmol/L, P<0.01]. This study also suggested that the  incidence of major adverse events was significantly lower in the low-level group compared with the high-level group (P=0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analyses to correct the influence of other confounding factors showed that HbA1c (OR=2.773, P=0.002) and postoperative blood glucose fluctuations (OR=3.091, P<0.001) could still predict the occurrence of postoperative adverse events. Conclusion    HbA1c on admission can effectively predict blood glucose fluctuations in 24 hours after surgery. Secondly, HbA1c on admission and postoperative blood glucose fluctuations can further predict postoperative adverse events. It is suggested that we control the patient's preoperative HbA1c at a low level, which is beneficial to control postoperative blood glucose fluctuation and postoperative adverse events.