Objective To establish the standard values of indicators for care quality evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods To acquire data of nurses configuration in 24 hospitals nationwide by the status survey method. On-spot examination, questionnaire, case-review methods were applied to determine the standard values of 638 benign prostatic hyperplasia patients' care quality in Xi'an three major general hospitals. Department self-report, patients' complaints and quality inspection provided adequate information for determining the standard values. Results The standard values of indicators for care quality evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia were successfully established. Conclusions Taking the mean and percentile of indicators as reference can acquire true and reliable results.

Aim To construct the fusion gene of human IgG3 upper hinge region and p53 tetramerization domain and to analyze its space conformation. Methods The fusion gene was obtained by recursive polymerase chain reaction (R-PCR),and was cloned into vector pUC19. The positive clone was selected and sequenced with PE310 auto-sequencer. The space conformation of the fusion gene expression product was predicted by using computer program Antheprot. Results Restriction endonuclease digestion confirmed that the fusion gene has been inserted correctly into the vector. The result of sequencing showed that the fusion gene is identical with designation. Analyzing with antheprot program showed that the fusion gene expression product could auto-assembly into a tetramer with four long and flexible linkers. Conclusion Successful construction of the fusion gene mentioned above laid the foundation for further preparation of multivalent gene engineering antibody.

Objective:To evaluate the accuracy of pRIFLE criterion and KDIGO criterion for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) after radical operations for tetralogy of Fallot in children from the perspective of postoperative outcomes.Methods:A total of 375 children, aged<8 yr, undergoing radical operations for tetralogy of Fallot, were selected continuously and retrospectively. According to the pRIFLE and KDIGO diagnostic criteria, postoperative AKI was diagnosed, and the children were classified into different AKI grades. The prognostic parameters (postoperative mechanical ventilation time, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, postoperative length of hospital stay, total costs of hospitalization, and in-hospital mortality, etc.) were collected, and the differences among different AKI grades were compared. Logistic regression method was used to analyze the risk factors for prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay (≥14 days) when two different criteria were used to diagnose AKI. The children diagnosed as non-AKI by KDIGO criterion were further confirmed using pRIFLE criterion, and the prognostic parameters in the children who were diagnosed as AKI and non-AKI were compared.Results:When two different criteria were used to diagnose AKI after radical resection for tetralogy of Fallot, the incidence was 56.8% (pRIFLE criterion) and 40.0% (KDIGO criterion). AKI diagnosed according to the two criteria was the independent risk factor for prolonged postoperative length of hospital stay, and the levels of all the prognostic parameters (postoperative mechanical ventilation time, duration of ICU stay, postoperative length of hospital stay, total costs of hospitalization, and in-hospital mortality) were significantly higher in AKI children than in non-AKI (AKI grade 0) children ( P<0.01). Among the 225 children diagnosed as non-AKI according to the KDIGO criterion, 63 cases were diagnosed as AKI and 162 cases as non-AKI according to the pRIFLE criterion, however, there was no significant difference in each prognostic parameter between children with AKI and non-AKI ( P>0.05). Conclusion:The pRIFLE criterion has a higher sensitivity, while the KDIGO criterion produces better accuracy when used to evaluate the diagnosis of AKI after radical operation for tetralogy of Fallot in children from the perspective of postoperative outcomes.