1.Immersion in Warm Water is Beneficial for Renal Function
Yoshihiro YOSHIDA ; Harutoshi SAKAKIMA ; Fumiyo MATSUDA ; Shun-ichi UENO ; Tomomi KAMIZONO ; Kimiko IZUMO ; Miyuki TOGOU ; Azusa TAKAHASHI
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine 2008;71(2):124-130
Renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are decreased in patients with heat stroke. Heat stroke after prolonged exercise under high temperatures is usually associated with hypotension and dehydration, leading to decreased RPF. However, whether renal blood flow (RBF), RPF, and GFR are increased or decreased during immersion in mild warm water remains unknown.
Para-aminohippurate clearance (CPAH), sodium thiosulfate clearance (Cthio), and creatinine clearance (Ccr) were determined in 14 healthy men aged 19 to 27 years old (mean±SD, 22±2), 161 to 181cm (171.5±6.3) tall, and weighing 52 to 78kg (64.2±7.4) without immersion at about 25°C (room temperature) and during immersion in water at 41±0.5°C.
CPAH, Cthio, and RBF significantly increased during immersion compared with those without immersion (P<0.0001, P<0.03, P<0.0001, respectively). Ccr did not change (P=0.108). The filtration fraction (FF) was significantly decreased (P<0.001). Levels of plasma atrial natriuretic peptide, aldosterone, anti-diuretic hormone and renin did not significantly differ between these two conditions.
This investigation suggests that daily immersion at 41°C is beneficial for renal function.
2.Questionnaire Survey of Medical Staff and Community Dwellers on End-of-life Care
Junichi MATSUDA ; Mari HANASHIMA ; Sachiko UEDA ; Ryutaro MASHINO ; Fumiyo OOTA ; Yuka YUKA ; Masatoshi SHIGETA ; Nobuyuki MITANI ; Takayuki KUGA
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2020;68(5):627-
We conducted a questionnaire survey of 525 persons regarding end-of-life care (EoLC) between November and December 2017. A total of 495 individuals responded (response rate 94.3%). Respondents were grouped into either a medical staff (MS) group or community persons (CP) group. Significant differences were found between the MS and CP groups in implementing a family conference about EoLC (p<0.05), but not in preparing documents about personal preferences for EoLC. There were significant differences between the groups in medical treatments in EoLC, for example, total parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and mechanical ventilation with intubation (p<0.05). It is important that medical treatment in EoLC should meet the requirements of patients and their families. This study revealed differences in some aspects of EoLC between the MS and CP groups. Individuals should be supported in personally making decisions about their own EoLC.