4.Effects of Serial Bathing in a Cold Spring on Immunological Parameters of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Supplements of the study on Kan no Jigoku Spa.
Masashi NOBUNAGA ; Keiji TATSUKAWA ; Hironobu ISHII ; Fumio YOSHIDA
The Journal of The Japanese Society of Balneology, Climatology and Physical Medicine 1994;57(2):113-122
Previously one of our colleagues reported that the serial bathing (twice a day for 3 weeks) in a cold spring, Kan-no-Jigoku (simple hydrogen sulfide spring of 14°C) resulted in clinical improvements for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In that study, the effect on immune functions was also investigated, since RA is characterized by immune abnormalities. The following results were obtained.
1. No change was observed in serum gamma globulin levels and hemolytic complement activities.
2. Rheumatoid factor titers after the latex fixation test were improved in 2 out of 8 cases, by 1-2 steps after 2 weeks of bathing.
3. Circulating immune complex levels, which were significantly higher initially, fell gradually during 3 weeks of bathing, but insignificantly.
4. OKT4T cells decreased significantly after 3 weeks of bathing, while OKT3 and OKT8T cells decreased insignificantly. The OKT4/OKT8 ratio was elevated slightly after serial bathing of 3 weeks.
5. Plasma prostaglandin E levels were elevated significantly after 2 weeks, but returned to the initial levels after 3 weeks of bathing, although all the levels were within normal range. No such changes of them were observed by a hot spring bathing.
6. Plasma cyclic AMP levels, which were a little higher than the normal range in 3 out of 9 cases initially, were also elevated significantly after 1 week of bathing and returned to the initial levels thereafter gradually, while no significant changes of them were observed by a hot spring bathing.
7. Urinary hydroxyproline excretion was not changed by the serial bathing.
From the above results it was suggested that a cold spring bathing may give an immunosuppressive effect to a living body, resulting in benefit for RA patients.
5.Surgical Site Infection by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus after Cardiovascular Operations: An Outbreak and Its Control
Masayoshi Umesue ; Hiromi Ando ; Fumio Fukumura ; Ichirou Nagano ; Noriko Boku ; Satoshi Kimura ; Jiro Tanaka ; Shuichi Okamatsu ; Kenichi Nakamura ; Rumiko Yoshida
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2005;34(1):14-20
We encountered 15 cases of surgical site infection (SSI) by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among 153 patients who underwent a cardiovascular operation in 2000. SSIs consisted of 5 mediastinal infections, 9 surface wound infections and 1 artificial graft infection after an abdominal aortic surgery. All infected cases had been operated on between June and December 2000. Eighty-three cases, which underwent cardiovascular operations during this period, were divided into SSI or no-SSI groups and their clinical data were analyzed. The data included age, gender, preoperative diabetes, urgency, preoperative usage of a device like Swan-Ganz catheter or IABP, preoperative albumin level, preoperative physical state by ASA score, National Nosocominal Infections Surveillance index, duration of operation, usage of a cardiopulmonary bypass, duration of bypass, type of operation, and number of distal anastomoses in CABG operations. Multivariate analysis showed gender (male), diabetes, and emergency operation as independent risk factors for the incidence of SSI by MRSA. One patient, who suffered a mediastinal infection after CABG, had confirmed as demonstrating the colonization of MRSA in sputum preoperatively. Microbiological screening of medical staff showed 2 of the 6 surgical doctors and 3 of the 25 ward nurses exhibited colonization with MRSA. DNA analysis of MRSA, harvested from 5 infected patients, indicated at least 2 strains of MRSA and 1 of the 2 strains was identical to the MRSA that was detected in a doctor. We applied prophylactic measures with reference to the guideline for prevention of surgical site infection announced by CDC in 1999, which included the following: routine work-up of MRSA-colonization, and treatment of all MRSA colonized patients and those undergoing emergency operations with Mupirocin. Preoperative patients were isolated from MRSA-infected or colonized patients. MRSA-colonized surgical personnel were treated with Mupirocin ointment. Cephazoline was administered shortly before and after the operation as a prophylactic antibiotic. Vancomycin was added to Cephazoline in patients with a history of MRSA-colonization or infection. Through hand washing before and after daily contact with patients was emphasised to all medical staff. SSI surveillance conducted by an infection control team was implemented. After the introduction of the prophylactic measurements, one MRSA-SSI was observed among 113 cases who underwent a cardiovascular operation between January and September 2001.