1.Outcome Determining Factors for displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures treated operatively
Nawfar SA ; Chan KL ; Idham HM ; Izani IM ; Nahulan T
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2015;9(3):8-16
Introduction: Calcaneal fractures are caused by high energy
trauma and mostly are intra-articular fractures. Nondisplaced
intra-articular calcaneal fracture (IACF) can be
treated non-operatively. However, displaced intra-articular
need to be reduced and fixed anatomically to facilitate early
ankle rehabilitation and minimize functional impairment.
This study was done to find out the outcome of the IACF
patients who underwent operative treatment.
Methods: 62 patients with IACF were selected in this study
and had been followed up from June 2009 to May 2013.
They were placed into two groups; the operative treated and
non-operative treated groups. Bilateral ankle lateral view
plain radiographs were taken for comparison of the Bohler
and Gissane angles. Both groups of patients were assessed
by the Maryland Foot Score (MFS) and the SF-36v2 general
health survey questionnaire. The ability of the patients to
perform activity of daily living (ADL) and /or return to work
(RTW) was assessed as well.
Results: The operative treatment group of displaced IACF
patients achieved no significant better scores in the mean
MFS and SF-36v2 mean scores as compared to non operated
cases. There was no difference in RTW between the 2
groups, but earlier ADL was recorded in the operated group.
However, this study had found 5 associated factors which
causes major effect to the patients’ outcome to treatment.
Conclusions: The patient’s compliance with post-operative
rehabilitation regimen were found to be significantly related
with the outcomes.
fractures
2.The Radial Bow following Square Nailing in Radius and Ulna Shaft Fractures in Adults and its Relation to Disability and Function
Dave MB ; Parmar KD ; Sachde BA
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2016;10(2):11-15
One of the points made against nailing in radius and ulna
shaft fractures has been the loss of radial bow and its impact
on function. The aims of the study were to assess the change
in magnitude and location of the radial bow in radius and
ulna shaft fractures treated with intramedullary square nails
and to assess the impact of this change on functional
outcome, patient reported disability and the range of motion
of the forearm. We measured the magnitude of radial bow
and its location in the operated extremity and compared it to
the uninjured side in 32 adult patients treated with
intramedullary square nailing for radius and ulna shaft
fractures at our institute. The mean loss of magnitude of
maximum radial bow was 2.18 mm which was statistically
significant by both student-T test and Mann-Whitney U test
with p value less than 0.01. The location of maximum radial
bow shifted distally but was statistically insignificant. The
magnitude of maximum radial bow had a negative
correlation with DASH score that was statistically
insignificant (R=- 0.22, p=0.21). It had a positive,
statistically significant correlation to the extent of supination
in the operated extremity (R = 0.66, p = 0.0004). A loss of up
to 2mm of radial bow did not influence the functional
outcome as assessed by criteria reported by Anderson et al.
The magnitude of radial bow influenced the supination of
the forearm but not the final disability as measured by
DASH score. Intramedullary nailing did decrease the
magnitude of radial bow but a reduction of up to 2mm did
not influence the functional outcome.
Ulna Fractures
;
Radius Fractures
3.Treatment of Distal Humeral Fractures.
Yong Cheol YOON ; Jong Keon OH
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2012;25(3):223-232
No abstract available.
Humeral Fractures
4.Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Stabilization Using a Medial Locking Plate for Proximal Tibial Fractures: Technical Note.
Jae Ang SIM ; Beom Koo LEE ; Kwang Hui KIM ; Yong Seuk LEE
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2013;26(4):327-332
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) is beneficial for proximal tibial fractures since these injuries are mostly caused by high energy traumas. The advantages of MIPO are minimization of soft tissue dissection and preservation of periosteal vascularization. Lateral plating has mostly developed as MIPO for proximal tibial fractures. We introduce minimal invasive percutaneous plate stabilization using a medial locking plate as alternative treatment for proximal tibial fractures.
Tibial Fractures
5.Management of Long Bone Fractures with Severe Bone Defect.
Jae Woo CHO ; Jinil KIM ; Han Ju KIM ; Jong Keon OH
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2015;28(3):205-214
No abstract available.
Fractures, Bone*
6.Surgical Treatment of the Low Lumbar (L3 - L5) Spinal Fractures.
Ki Soo KIM ; Yong Soo CHOI ; Chai In LIM ; Yang Min CHUNG ; Heun Gyun JUNG
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery 1997;4(1):74-80
No abstract available.
Spinal Fractures*
7.Whatever Your Preference Is for the Treatment of the Proximal Humeral Fracture.
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2017;20(4):181-182
No abstract available.
Shoulder Fractures*
8.Clinical experiences of intermaxillary fixation with surgical splint(bite block) in mandibular fractures.
Tai Kyun IM ; Sung Gyu PARK ; Rong Min BEAK ; Kap Sung OH ; Joon CHOE ; Se Min BAEK
Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 1993;20(4):859-867
No abstract available.
Mandibular Fractures*
9.Nonoperative Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture.
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2009;22(3):214-217
No abstract available.
Fractures, Compression
10.Management of Open Tibial Fractures: Role of Internal Fixation.
Journal of the Korean Fracture Society 2007;20(4):349-354
No abstract available.
Tibial Fractures*