This study identified the explanatory power of the Korean rehabilitation patient group (KRPG) v1.1 for acquired brain injury (ABI) on medical expenses in the rehabilitation hospitals and the correlation of functional outcomes with the expenses. Here, the design is a retrospective analysis from the claim data of the designated rehabilitation hospitals. Data including KRPG information with functional status and medical expenses were collected from 1 January and 31 August 2018. Reduction of variance (R2) was statistically analyzed for the explanation power of the KRPG. Association between functional status and the medical expenses was carried out using the Spearman's rank order correlation (rho). From the claim data of 365 patients with ABI, the KRPG v1.1 explained 8.6% of variance for the total medical expenses and also explained 9.8% of variance for the rehabilitation therapy costs. Cognitive function and spasticity showed very weak correlation with the total medical expenses (rho = −0.17 and −0.14, respectively). Motor power and performance of activities of daily living were associated weakly (rho = −0.27 and −0.30, respectively). The KRPG and related functional status in ABI reflects the total medical expenses and rehabilitation therapy costs insufficiently in the designated rehabilitation hospitals. Thus, the current KRPG algorithm and variables for ABI may need to be ameliorated in the future.
Activities of Daily Living ; Brain Diseases ; Brain Injuries ; Brain ; Cognition ; Diagnosis-Related Groups ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Humans ; Muscle Spasticity ; Neurological Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUND: As of July 2015, per diem payment was changed from fee for service Therefore, this study aims to analyse changes in medical charges and medical services before and after enforcement of the palliative care, targeting palliative care wards in a general hospital, and provide basic data needed for development of per diem payment. METHODS: The subjects of the study were a total of 610 cases consisting of 351 patients of service fee who left hospital (died) from July 2014 to June 2016 and 259 ones of per diem payment at Chosun University Hospital in Gwangju Metropolitan City. RESULTS: The results are summarized as follows. First, after the palliative care system was applied, benefit medical service charges and insurance increased significantly (p<0.001). As benefit medical service charges increased, benefit private insurance payment increased significantly (p<0.001). Second, after the per diem payment was applied, total private insurance payment to medical institutes decreased significantly (p=0.050) and non-benefit also decreased significantly (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: It is suggested that additional rewards in the obligatory palliative care items should be continuously remedied and monitored to provide good quality hospice palliative care.
Academies and Institutes ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Fees and Charges ; Gwangju ; Hospices ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Insurance ; Palliative Care ; Reward

The fee-for-service system is used as the main payment system for health care providers in Korea. It has been argued that it can't reflect differences in the medical practice costs across regions because the fee schedule is calculated based on the average cost. So, some researchers and providers have disputed that there is need for adopting geographic practice cost index (GPCI) used in the United States for the Medicare program for the elderly to the fee-for-service payment system. This study performed to identify whether the difference in the practice costs among regions exists or not and to examine the feasibility of applying GPCI to Korea payment system. For this purpose, we calculated modified-GPCI and examined considerations to introduce GPCI in Korea. First we identified available data to calculate GPCI. Second, we made applicable GPCI equations to Korea payment system and computed it based on four types of regions (metropolitan, urban, suburban, and rural). We also categorize the regions based on the availability of the medical resources and the capability of utilizing them. As a result, we found that there wasn't any significant difference in the GPCI by regional types in general, but the indices of rural areas (0.91–0.98) was relatively low compared to the indices of other regions (0.96–1.07). Considering the need to use GPCI floor, the pros and cons of using GPCI, and the concern of the regional imbalance of resources, the introduction of GPCI needs to be carefully considered.
Aged ; Fee Schedules ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Korea ; Medicare ; Relative Value Scales ; United States

Globally, efforts are being made to develop and strengthen a palliative care policy to support a comprehensive healthcare system. Korea has implemented a hospice and palliative care (HPC) policy as part of a cancer policy under the 10 year plan to conquer cancer and a comprehensive measure for national cancer management. A legal ground for the HPC policy was laid by the Cancer Control Act passed in 2003. Currently in the process is legislation of a law on the decision for life-sustaining treatment for HPC and terminally-ill patients. The relevant law has expanded the policy-affected disease group from terminal cancer to cancer, human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic liver disease/liver cirrhosis. Since 2015, the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme reimburses for HPC with a combination of the daily fixed sum and the fee for service systems. By the provision type, the HPC is classified into hospitalization, consultation, and home-based treatment. Also in place is the system that designates, evaluates and supports facilities specializing in HPC, and such facilities are funded by the NHI fund and government subsidy. Also needed along with the legal system are consensus reached by people affected by the policy and more realistic fee levels for HPC. The public and private domains should also cooperate to set HPC standards, train professional caregivers, control quality and establish an evaluation system. A stable funding system should be prepared by utilizing the long-term care insurance fund and hospice care fund.
Caregivers ; Comprehensive Health Care ; Consensus ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Fees and Charges ; Fibrosis ; Financial Management ; Financing, Government ; Hospice Care ; Hospices* ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Insurance, Long-Term Care ; Jurisprudence ; Korea* ; Liver ; National Health Programs ; Palliative Care* ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

BACKGROUND: Issues concerning with the classification accuracy of Korean Outpatient Groups (KOPGs) have been raised by providers and researchers. The KOPG is an outpatient classification system used to measure casemix of outpatient visits and to adjust provider risk in charges by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service in managing insurance payments. The objective of this study were to refine KOPGs to improve the classification accuracy and to evaluate the refinement. METHODS: We refined the rules used to classify visits with multiple procedures, newly defined chemotherapy drug groups, and modified the medical visit indicators through reviews of other classification systems, data analyses, and consultations with experts. We assessed the improvement by measuring % of variation in case charges reduced by KOPGs and the refined system, Enhanced KOPGs (EKOPGs). We used claims data submitted by providers to the HIRA during the year 2012 in both refinement and evaluation. RESULTS: EKOPGs explicitly allowed additional payments for multiple procedures with exceptions of packaging of routine ancillary services and consolidation of related significant procedures, and discounts ranging from 30% to 70% were defined in additional payments. Thirteen chemotherapy drug KOPGs were added and medical visit indicators were streamlined to include codes for consultation fees for outpatient visits. The % of variance reduction achieved by EKOPGs was 48% for all patients whereas the figure was 40% for KOPGs, and the improvement was larger in data from tertiary and general hospitals than in data from clinics. CONCLUSION: A significant improvement in the performance of the KOPG was achieved by refining payments for visits with multiple procedures, defining groups for visits with chemotherapy, and revising medical visit indicators.
Classification ; Drug Therapy* ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Fees and Charges ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Information Systems ; Insurance ; Insurance Claim Review ; Insurance, Health ; Outpatients* ; Product Packaging ; Prospective Payment System ; Referral and Consultation

This article overviews currently available options for rewarding peer reviewers. Rewards and incentives may help maintain the quality and integrity of scholarly publications. Publishers around the world implemented a variety of financial and nonfinancial mechanisms for incentivizing their best reviewers. None of these is proved effective on its own. A strategy of combined rewards and credits for the reviewers1 creative contributions seems a workable solution. Opening access to reviews and assigning publication credits to the best reviews is one of the latest achievements of digitization. Reviews, posted on academic networking platforms, such as Publons, add to the transparency of the whole system of peer review. Reviewer credits, properly counted and displayed on individual digital profiles, help distinguish the best contributors, invite them to review and offer responsible editorial posts.
*Communication ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Humans ; *Peer Review, Research ; Periodicals as Topic ; Publishing ; *Reward ; Science

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Korean National Health Insurance is based on 'fee for service' system, but recently 7 groups of diseases were forcibly applied to diagnosis related groups (DRG) system. In these 7 group of diseases, tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were included in the otorhinolaryngology field. The objective of this research is to estimate the invested medical costs, profit and loss, and improvement points for the disease groups according to DRG and 'fee for service' system. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We investigated 1,377 subjects who underwent tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy based on DRG between January 2011 to December 2013 at our hospital. The profit and loss of medical costs were calculated according to medical record data, medical service fee, and activity based costing (ABC). RESULTS: The total of 1,377 subject comprised of 905 patients younger than 17 years-old and 472 patients older than 18 years-old. A main moderate complication that was not one of the DRG diseases, postoperative bleeding, was only found in 19 patients (1.38%). Profit related to tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy studied for a 3 year-period was higher in the DRG system than in the 'fee for service' system; however, profit was reported as 62.9-67.5% of the actual prime costs. CONCLUSION: DRG system for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy seems to have higher compensation rate than the 'fee for service' system does. However, the system is still insufficient to compare profit with the input medical cost. Furthermore, the present system of disease grouping needs to be improved to reflect actual medical prime costs.
Adenoidectomy* ; Compensation and Redress ; Diagnosis-Related Groups ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Fees and Charges ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Medical Records ; National Health Programs ; Otolaryngology ; Tonsillectomy*

Strengthening primary care has always been a major policy issue in most developed countries to achieve the health care system's goals, and policy makers continuously try to use payment system as an effective tool to improve overall performance of primary care. In this paper, we examined the various payment methods and growing trends in primary care payment system in some developed countries. Overall, a common form of payment for primary care doctors is a blend of fee-for-service (FFS), capitation, and pay-for-performance (P4P). In addition, many countries are still in the way of many new trials to find the right way to provide primary care service effectively, to meet the complex health care needs of populations. In Korea, primary care system is not well-established, and other institutional arrangements are not in good conditions for primary care, either. FFS, which is a dominant payment method in Korea, is not favorable for achieving good attributes of primary care. Mixing various payment components, like capitation, P4P to current FFS is essential to provide the optimal incentive structures for primary care physicians. Also, new models to encourage doctor-patient relationships with appropriate P4P mechanisms could be used as an early step in reforming primary care payment system gradually.
Administrative Personnel ; Delivery of Health Care ; Developed Countries ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Humans ; Korea ; Motivation ; Physicians, Primary Care ; Primary Health Care ; Reimbursement, Incentive

With the adoption of national health insurance in 1977, Korea has been utilizing fee-for-service payment with contract-based healthcare reimbursement system in 2000. Under the system, fee-for-service reimbursement has been accused of augmenting national healthcare expenditure by excessively increasing service volume. The researcher examined in this paper two major alternatives including diagnosis related group-based payment and global budget to contemplate the future of reimbursement system of Korean national health insurance. Various literature and preceding studies on pilot project and actual implementation of Neo-KDRG were reviewed. As a result, DRG-based payment was effective for healthcare cost control but low in administrative efficiency. Global budget may be adequate for cost control and improving the quality of healthcare and administrative efficiency. However, many healthcare providers disagree that excess care arising from fee-for-service payment alone has led to financial deterioration of national health insurance and healthcare institutions should take responsibility with global budget payment as an appropriate solution. Dissimilar payment systems may be applied to different types of institutions to reflect their unique attributes, and this process can be achieved step-by-step. Developing public sphere among the stakeholders and striving for consensus shall be kept as collateral to attain the desirable reimbursement system in the future.
*Budgets ; Delivery of Health Care/economics ; Diagnosis-Related Groups ; Efficiency, Organizational/economics ; Fee-for-Service Plans/economics ; Forecasting ; Humans ; *Insurance, Health, Reimbursement ; National Health Programs/*economics ; Republic of Korea

Medical insurance, which is mandatory in Korea, has been progressed in the way of expanding the relevant population and intensifying the guarantee. However, rapid increases in medical expenses led national health insurance into a state of financial crisis. The government considered the reason of financial crisis as fee-for-service and started reorganizing the terms of payment from fee-for-service to case-payment. Therefore, an expanded diagnosis related group (DRG) payment system is carried out to decrease the expense on health and to secure financial stability. At the same time, the new case-payment system, apposite to the medical case in Korean society, is under demonstration. DRG payment system is in execution for the 7 disease entities of the four departments requested for now. However, it is supposed to be carried out in all the hospitals from the second half of 2012 and be expanded to all the general hospitals from 2013. The new case-payment system is under development because it is difficult to apply DRG to all disease entities. These shake-ups in the payment system will be conducted from the year 2015, combining both the DRG and new case-payment system. Basically, the introduction of the new case-payment system will cause doctors' passive attitude in the treatment of patients. This would be an especially serious problem for the department of surgery whose charge for operation is very low. It would be worse for the vascular surgeons because only 80% of operational or interventional procedures will be compensated, the fee for ultrasound is included in the new case-payment system, and age-related severity is not reflected in the disease entity. If relaunch is inevitable, vascular surgeons should understand the new case-payment system exactly and point out the problems. Also, standard guidelines on treatment per procedure should be set up and used for the established case-payment system, which would be helpful in reducing unnecessary medical expenses.
Diagnosis-Related Groups ; Fee-for-Service Plans ; Fees and Charges ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Insurance ; Korea ; National Health Programs