Introduction: Little is known about the sero-prevalence of diphtheria anti-toxoid antibody levels among medical students in Malaysia. They too, just like other health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of contracting and transmitting diphtheria. Fortunately, this can be prevented by giving a specific vaccine: the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) vaccine. Nonetheless, data from local or regional surveys are needed before any decision is made by the respective authorities. General objective: We studied the epidemiology of diphtheria anti-toxoid antibody levels and vaccination history amongst medical students and staff in Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia. Specific objectives: We determined the level of diphtheria anti-toxoid antibodies amongst pre-clinical students and staff. Methodology: A total of 152 sera were collected from subjects aged 19 to 63, and diphtheria anti-toxoid levels were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: One hundred and fifty-two (94.4%) blood samples out of 161 participants were successfully withdrawn, which comprised 105 (69.1%) and 47 (30.9%) medical students and staff, respectively. A total of 77.6% and the other 22.4% of the subjects had full and basic protection, respectively. Higher levels were predominant amongst males and they were 1.3 times more protected than females in 20-29 year-old group (85.1% vs 66.2%; odd ratios 1.25 [95% CI 1.03-1.50]; P=0.03). No significant difference in the levels of immunity among subjects for ethnicity and academic position (P>0.05). Recommendations: Level of full protection against diphtheria toxin should be clearly defined by broad population based studies using several comparable detection methods. Medical students and staff with basic protection should be closely monitored or should be given a booster dose for those who are at high risk of acquiring the disease. Thus, a standard degree of coverage should be clearly determined for health workers to prevent a potential outbreak. Conclusion: Students and staff possess immunity towards diptheria toxin however the level of full protective antibody is yet to be determined in future.

The purpose of this study is to characterize 3 non-albicans Candida spp. that were collected from two major hospitals in a densely populated area of Kuala Lumpur for their susceptibilities to azole and genetic background. Fifteen non-albicans Candida clinical isolates in two major hospitals in Kuala Lumpur area of Malaysia were collected by convenience sampling during 2007 and 2010. The genetic diversity of 15 non-albicans Candida species comprising C. glabrata (n = 5), C. parapsilosis (n = 5) and C. rugosa (n = 5) were assessed by RAPD-PCR typing. Strains were initially identified using biochemical tests and CHROMagar Candida medium. Fluconazole and voriconazole susceptibilities were determined by E-test method. Commercial kits were used for DNA extraction and amplification with RAPD primers (OPA02, OPA03 and OPA08). PCR conditions were optimized and simultaneous identification was possible by agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products and the bands obtained were analyzed using BioNumerics Applied Maths v.6.6 software. The RAPD primers used in this study generated 100% polymorphic profile. Cluster analysis using the RAPD-PCR profile showed 12.5-25% similarity among the strains. The genetic diversity was based on the strain susceptibility towards both the azoles, site of isolation and place according to their unique banding patterns. In contrast, strains susceptible to azoles were found to be genetically similar with clonal dissimilarity. The use of OPA02, OPA03 and OPA08 primers in differentiating non-albicans Candida spp. underscores the higher resolution of RAPD-PCR as a reliable tool for strain/species level differentiation.