1.Studies on Clinical Application of Congnitive Evoked Potentials.
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 1988;6(1):1-8
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials*
2.Singnificance of Evoked Potential.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1989;22(2):169-173
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials*
3.Characteristics of Trigeminal Evoked Potential and It's Pathway in the Rat.
Se Hyuk KIM ; Chun Zhi ZHAO ; Oh Kyoo KWON ; Bae Hwan LEE ; Yong Gou PARK ; Sang Sup CHUNG
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2000;29(8):985-994
No abstract available.
Animals
;
Evoked Potentials*
;
Rats*
4.Effects of Plateau Time on Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (cVEMP) elicited by 500-Hz Tone Burst
Vijay Marimuthu ; Mohd Fairul Syafiq Harun
Malaysian Journal of Health Sciences 2016;14(1):31-36
Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (cVEMP) is a routine vestibular test which checks the integrity of
vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) pathway. Clinically, 500-Hz tone burst is widely used stimulus to evoke a cVEMP. Although
several studies have suggested different plateau times (PT) for eliciting cVEMPs, but not many have reported the optimal
PT for evoking cVEMP using 500 Hz tone burst stimuli. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effect of
PT on cVEMPs elicited by 500 Hz tone burst at 95 dBnHL using four different PT (0, 2, 4 and 10 ms). Thirty healthy
adults with normal hearing and vestibular systems participated in this study. Results revealed that the P1 latency was
significantly longer for PT 10 ms compared to other PTs. N1 latency was significantly prolonged for long PT of 10 ms
compared to PT 2 ms. P2 latency showed no significant differences among PTs. The P1-N1 inter-amplitude values
however revealed no significant difference across all PTs. It was found that the P1-N1 inter-amplitude was severely
affected after 4 ms of PT. This study concluded that the PT of either 0 or 2 ms yielded the most robust cVEMP.
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials
5.Motor evoked potential in stroke.
Min Joung KANG ; Tae Sik YOON ; Chang Il PARK ; Sae Il CHUN
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(1):26-35
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Motor*
;
Stroke*
6.Considerations in measuring somatosensory evoked potential.
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(2):151-156
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory*
7.Motor evoked potentials in hemiparesis by magnetic stimulation.
In Sung LEE ; Hee Sang KIM ; Kyung Hoi AHN
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1992;16(1):35-41
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Motor*
;
Paresis*
8.Motor evoked potential in bulbocavernosus muscle using magnetic stimulation.
Seoung Woong KANG ; Joo Sup KIM ; Jae Hyung SA ; Jae Ho MOON
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(3):341-347
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Motor*
10.N30 Somatosensory Evoked Potential Is Negatively Correlated with Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease.
Journal of Movement Disorders 2016;9(1):35-39
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate frontal N30 status in Parkinson's disease (PD) and to examine the correlation between the amplitude of frontal N30 and the severity of motor deficits. METHODS: The frontal N30 was compared between 17 PD patients and 18 healthy volunteers. Correlations between the amplitude of frontal N30 and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score of the more severely affected side was examined. RESULTS: The mean latency of the N30 was not significantly different between patients and healthy volunteers (p = 0.981), but the mean amplitude was lower in PD patients (p < 0.025). There was a significant negative correlation between the amplitude of N30 and the UPDRS motor score (r = -0.715, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The frontal N30 status indicates the motor severity of PD. It can be a useful biomarker reflecting dopaminergic deficits and an objective measurement for monitoring the clinical severity of PD.
Evoked Potentials
;
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory*
;
Healthy Volunteers
;
Humans
;
Parkinson Disease*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail