Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has put an immense strain on health systems worldwide. Nurses at the front line are prone to experience several staffing issues facing ever-increasing stresses to the health care system by a pandemic situation. The staffing experiences of nurses in this context can have a significant impact on current nursing practice and existing policies. Objective: To carry out a synthesis of the scientific evidence available on the staffing experiences of nurses during the SARS, MERS, and Ebola epidemics. Method: A narrative review was conducted. A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. All studies describing nurses' experiences were included regardless of methodology. Atotal of 16 articles was included in the review. Results: Narrative synthesis revealed ten themes from the results of the articles: training, staffing ratios and models, shifting models, volunteer staffing, skill mix, planning staffing needs, hospital preparedness, communication, effects of workload, and structured workflow processes. Conclusions Nurses are pivotal to the healthcare response to infectious disease pandemics and epidemics. The results of this review should provide a basis for nurse managers and administrators on how they can actively engage in supporting the staffing concerns and issues of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19 ; Pandemics

Background: Being at the frontline, nurses working in hospital settings are vulnerable to a range of experiences that impact their wellbeing. Measures to protect their health and welfare during the COVID-19 pandemic have been the focus of discussion among policymakers and administrators. There is a need to collectively understand their personal experiences to inform relevant policy decisions. Objective: To synthesize and present the best available evidence describing the experiences of nurses working in hospital settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: This is a rapid review using Tricco's seven stage process. Data sources: A structured search using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and a local database Herdin was conducted. Review Methods: A rapid review of studies published from January to August 2020, describing nurses' experiences of working in hospital facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic were included regardless of methodology. Following data screening and extraction, a narrative synthesis of the findings was conducted. Results: Nineteen articles were included in the review. The experiences of nurses described in these articles generated a total of fifteen categories, based on similarities of meaning. Four synthesized findings were identified from the categories: (a) supportive nursing culture; (b) physical, emotional, and psychological impact of frontline work; (c) organizational responsiveness; (d) and maintaining standards of care. Conclusions Nurses' experiences working in hospital settings during the COVID-19 pandemic are diverse, profound, and dependent on the context of practice and prevailing healthcare system and organization. These experiences reflect personal encounters and shifts in healthcare delivery that ensure protection and safety while maintaining standards of care. Robust studies are needed to capture and explore the breadth of these experiences and heighten the discussions that advocate for nurses' welfare and safety during pandemics.
COVID-19 ; Pandemics

BACKGROUND

Nurses are at the forefront of caring for patients during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurses themselves are exposed to serious risk and even death while providing care for these patients. Among other healthcare professionals, nurses are mostly exposed to psychologically distressing situations during this time of crisis. Fear of COVID-19 can affect nurses’ overall well-being, which in turn may affect their job performance and lead to a decline in the quality of patient care.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the level of fear of COVID-19, and to explore the experiences of COVID-19-related fear of frontline nurses in a national university hospital in the Philippines.

METHODS

To achieve the study objectives, the study utilized a convergent mixed methodology approach. In the quantitative phase, a random sample of participants completed the Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S) in order to assess their level of fear of COVID-19. Semistructured interviews were conducted in the qualitative strand. Participants in the qualitative phase was selected using maximum variation sampling. Integration of data was done through a narrative contiguous approach.

RESULTS

Quantitative data was obtained from 206 frontline registered nurses. The mean age of the participants was 35.5 years (SD =8.17). Overall, the composite score of the fear of COVID-19 scale was 21.76 (SD = 4.92), indicating an elevated level of fear. Having friends and relatives who tested positive predicted fear of COVID-19 (β = -3.658; p = 0.005; CI: -6.213 to -1.104). Three major themes categories emerged from qualitative data analysis: (1) balancing feelings of fear and moral obligation, (2) challenges experienced while providing frontline work, and (3) resilience amidst challenges. For the reporting and integration of our mixed-method results, a narrative contiguous approach was implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

Frontline nurses reported an elevated level of fear during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was also able to capture the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of nurses, specifically on their fear experiences. Understanding the underlying causes of fear, such as uncertainties surrounding guidelines and protocols, shortage of personal protective equipment, and moral distress, offers invaluable insights for shaping proactive strategies and policies aimed at mitigating these concerns in subsequent pandemics.

Human ; Covid-19 ; Fear ; Nurses