1.Why do we still have Helicobacter Pylori in our Stomachs?
Amin Talebi Bezmin Abadi ; Enzo Ierardi ; Yeong Yeh Lee
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 2015;22(5):70-75
The existence of any infectious agent in a highly acidic human stomach is contentious, but
the chance finding of Helicobacter pylori is by no means an accident. Once H. pylori colonises the
gastric mucosa, it can persist for a lifetime, and it is intriguing why our immune system is able to
tolerate its existence. Some conditions favour the persistence of H. pylori in the stomach, but other
conditions oppose the colonisation of this bacterium. Populations with high and extremely low
prevalence of H. pylori provide useful insights on the clinical outcomes that are associated with this
type of infection. Adverse clinical outcomes including peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer depend
on a delicate balance between a harmless inflammation and a more severe kind of inflammation. Is
the only good H. pylori really a dead H. pylori? The jury is still out.
2.Breath Tests for the Non-invasive Diagnosis of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
Giuseppe LOSURDO ; Gioacchino LEANDRO ; Enzo IERARDI ; Francesco PERRI ; Michele BARONE ; Mariabeatrice PRINCIPI ; Alfredo Di LEO
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2020;26(1):16-28
Background/Aims:
Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) diagnosis is usually based on non-invasive breath tests (BTs), namely lactulose BT (LBT) and glucose BT (GBT). However, divergent opinions and problems of parameter standardization are still controversial aspects. We aim to perform a meta-analysis to analyze diagnostic performance of LBT/GBT for SIBO diagnosis.
Methods:
We searched in main literature databases articles in which SIBO diagnosis was achieved by LBT/GBT in comparison to jejunal aspirate culture (reference gold standard). We calculated pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odd ratios. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn and pooled areas under the curve were calculated.
Results:
We selected 14 studies. Pooled sensitivity of LBT and GBT was 42.0% and 54.5%, respectively. Pooled specificity of LBT and GBT was 70.6% and 83.2%, respectively. When delta over baseline cut-off > 20 H2 parts per million (ppm) was used, GBT sensitivity and specificity were 47.3% and 80.9%; when the cutoff was other than and lower than > 20 ppm, sensitivity and specificity were 61.7% and 86.0%. In patients with abdominal surgery history, pooled GBT sensitivity and specificity gave the impression of having a better performance (81.7% and 78.8%) compared to subjects without any SIBO predisposing condition (sensitivity = 40.6% and specificity = 84.0%).
Conclusions
GBT seems to work better than LBT. A cut-off of delta H2 expired other than and lower than > 20 ppm shows a slightly better result than > 20 ppm. BTs demonstrate the best effectiveness in patients with surgical reconstructions of gastrointestinal tract.
3.Opioid-induced Constipation: Old and New Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment
Francesco SQUEO ; Francesca CELIBERTO ; Enzo IERARDI ; Francesco RUSSO ; Giuseppe RIEZZO ; Benedetta D’ATTOMA ; Alfredo Di LEO ; Giuseppe LOSURDO
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2024;30(2):131-142
Daily use of opioid analgesics has significantly increased in recent years due to an increasing prevalence of conditions associated with chronic pain. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of the most common, under-recognized, and under-treated side effects of opioid analgesics. OIC significantly reduces the quality of life by causing psychological distress, lowering work productivity, and increasing access to healthcare facilities. The economic and social burden of OIC led to the development of precise strategies for daily clinical practice. Key aspects are the prevention of constipation through adequate water intake and fiber support, avoidance of sedentariness, and early recognition and treatment of cofactors that could worsen constipation. Recommended first-line therapy includes osmotic (preferably polyethylene glycol) and stimulant laxatives. Peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists, such as methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, or naldemedine, should be used in patients that have not responded to the first-line treatments. The bowel functional index is the main tool for assessing the severity of OIC and for monitoring the response. The paper discusses the recent literature on the pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, and management of OIC and provides a pragmatic approach for its assessment and treatment.