1.Complications of head and neck reconstructive surgery using axial pedicled flap.
Alexander Edward S. Dy ; Eduard M. Alfanta ; Armando M. Chiong Jr.
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2015;30(2):19-24
OBJECTIVES: Axial flap surgery is associated with numerous complications. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of these complications, and identify possible factors contributory to their occurrence.
METHODS:
Design: Cross-Sectional Study
Setting: Tertiary Public University Hospital
Subjects: Records of all patients who underwent axial pedicled flap reconstruction at the otorhinolaryngology ward of our tertiary public university hospital from January 2013 to July 2015 were retrospectively reviewed, and data consisting of age, sex, diagnosis, disease stage, smoking history, alcohol intake, co-morbidities, past operations, pre-operative hemoglobin and albumin, total operative time, total blood loss, location and total area of the surgical defect and length of hospitalization were tabulated. All complications were listed. Data were analyzed for any potential trends.
RESULTS: A total of 38 patients underwent axial pedicled flap reconstruction in the study period. Nineteen out of 38 (50%) cases involved complications. The most common complication was infection. Most of the complications occurred in males with history of alcohol intake, advanced cancer stage, significant blood loss, recurrent tumors, low pre-operative hemoglobin and albumin levels, and a large area of surgical defect.
CONCLUSIONS: The complication rate for axial flap surgery in our series was significant at 50%. Potential risk factors identified were male gender, advanced cancer stage, tumor recurrence, alcohol intake, low pre-operative hemoglobin and albumin levels, significant blood loss, longer operative time, and a larger surgical defect.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Aged 80 and over ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Surgical Flaps
2.Clinical care pathway time intervals and tumor progression among head and neck cancer patients at East Avenue Medical Center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Fery Mai J. Rafanan ; Eduard M. Alfanta ; Romulus Roberto Peter A. Instrella
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2024;39(1):31-35
Objective:
To investigate the association between the time intervals of key clinical time points and tumor progression (increase in clinical staging) in head and neck cancer patients before and during the pandemic.
Methods:
Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. Setting: Tertiary Government Training Hospital. Participants: A total of 81 head and neck cancer patients who consulted at the OPD and underwent elective surgery between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, under the Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery of East Avenue Medical Center were included in the study; 40 patients comprised the pre-pandemic group and 41 patients-the pandemic group.
Results:
Majority of patients were men (61.73%), and the mean age was 54 years. The most prevalent tumor site was the oral cavity (37.04%). Most patients were Clinical Stage IV at the time of diagnosis (32.10%) and at the time of surgery (58.02%). In the pre-pandemic period, median time-to-consult was 180 days, time-to-diagnosis was 14 days, and time-to-treatment was 57 days. During the pandemic, median time-to-consult significantly increased to 365 days (Mann-Whitney test, U = 589, p = .028), but time-to-diagnosis decreased to 10 days, and time to-treatment decreased to 43 days, although these were not significant (U = 775, p = .667; U = 809, p = .917). Among the 81 patients in the study, 14 (17.28%) showed tumor progression (pre-pandemic: 6; 15%; pandemic: 8; 19.51%), but there was no significant association between time-to-consult and increase in clinical staging for both pre-pandemic (χ2(38) = 34.2, p = .646) and pandemic groups (χ2(16) = 23.1, p = .110) or between time-to-diagnosis and increase in clinical staging for pre-pandemic (χ2(56) = 36.8, p = .978) and pandemic groups (χ2(23) = 28.3, p = .267). Overall, there was no significant association between time-to-treatment and increase in clinical staging for both pre-pandemic (χ2(62) = 80.00, p = .062) and pandemic groups (χ2(32) = 30.4, p = .548), but a subset of patients with larynx primary tumor site had a statistically significant association between time-to-treatment and tumor progression (χ2(5) = 12.00, p = .035).
Conclusion
This study revealed that there was an increase in time to-consult for head and neck cancer patients during the pandemic. However, there was no significant difference in time-to-diagnosis and time-to-treatment. This shows that the Department of ORL-HNS, East Avenue Medical Center has provided pandemic head and neck cancer care similar to before the pandemic. No significant associations were found between tumor progression and time intervals of the key clinical time points but patients who had an increase in clinical stage were noted with longer time-to treatment. It was also observed that more patients were in advanced clinical stages during the pandemic.
Head and Neck Neoplasms
;
Time-to-Treatment
;
COVID-19