1.Comparison of performance of graduates in traditional curriculum and graduates in an organ system integrated curriculum from the same medical school on the physician licensure examinations
Valbeuna Marisa N ; Castillo Teresita R ; Dimaano Tita L
Acta Medica Philippina 2011;45(2):58-60
Objective. To compare the performance of graduates in a traditional curriculum and graduates in an organ system integrated curriculum from the same school on the national medical licensure examination.
Methods. The scores of graduates of the University of the Philippines Manila College of Medicine in 2008, taught in the traditional medical curriculum were compared with those of the scores of graduates in 2009, taught under the organ system integrated curriculum, on the Physicians Licensure Examination (PLE) conducted by the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC). Average scores, and scores per subject were compared using t-test.
Results. The graduates of the organ system integrated curriculum (2009) had higher average scores than the graduates of the traditional curriculum (2008). The former also had higher scores in Physiology, Legal Medicine, Pathology, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Pediatrics. The scores of the 2 groups were not significantly different in Biochemistry, Anatomy, Pharmacology and Medicine. The graduates of the traditional curriculum had higher scores in Microbiology and Preventive Medicine.
Conclusion. The graduates of the organ system integrated curriculum (2009) had better over all performance in the physician licensure examinations than the graduates of the traditional curriculum (2008).
Human
;
Male
;
Female
;
LICENSURE, MEDICAL
;
LICENSURE
2.Correlation of performance of students in comprehensive examinations, general weighted average grade to the physician licensure examinations in a medical school with an organ system integrated curriculum.
Valbuena Marissa N. ; Castillo Teresita R. ; Lapeña Josefina I. ; Dimaano Tita L.
Acta Medica Philippina 2013;47(2):31-35
OBJECTIVES:
1. To describe the performance of medical students in comprehensive examinations given after each learning unit or year level.
2. To correlate the scores of the students in the comprehensive examinations to the general weighted average grade (GWAG) for the same learning unit.
3. To correlate the scores in the subject-based part of the comprehensive examinations to the scores in the Physicians Licensure Examination (PLE)
METHODS: The scores of graduates of the University of the Philippines Manila College of Medicine (UPCM) for the years 2009-2011 in the comprehensive examinations, their general weighted average grade per learning unit, and scores in the PLE were retrieved and analyzed. Correlation coefficients of comprehensive examination score and GWAG, and comprehensive examination score and PLE score were computed.
RESULTS: A total of 434 out of 463 graduates from UPCM were included in this study. There was no trend observed in the performance of students in the comprehensive examinations as they progressed from one learning unit to the next. Performance in both portions of the comprehensive examinations was observed to have significant correlation to students' LU GWAG for most of the learning units, with the exception of LU 6 and LU 7 for Class B. Performance in the subject-based portion of the comprehensive examinations was observed to have significant correlation to students' PLE scores.
CONCLUSIONS: The students' scores in the comprehensive examinations had moderate to strong correlation with the GWAG for the corresponding learning unit. Similarly, scores in the subject-based portion of the comprehensive examination had moderate to strong correlation with PLE scores.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Students, Medical ; Philippines ; Learning ; Licensure ; Physicians ; Physical Examination
3.Correlation of National Medical Admission Test scores, general weighted average grade in pre-medicine courses, general weighted average grade in medicine and the Physician Licensure Examination scores among medical graduates of the University of the Philippines Manila-College of Medicine.
Valbuena Marissa N ; Castillo Teresita R ; Villalon Pearl T ; Dimaano Tita L
Acta Medica Philippina 2011;45(3):69-72
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to examine the validity of the National Medical Admissions Test (NMAT) score, Pre-Medicine general weighted average grade (Pre-Med GWAG) in predicting the academic performance in medical school, as measured by the medical school general weighted average grade (Med GWAG) and Physician Licensure Examination (PLE). It also aimed to study which among the NMAT, pre-medicine GWAG and MedGWAG best correlates with PLE.
METHODS: Records of graduates of th UPCM from 2004 to 2009 were retrieved and data regardin the following entry characteristics were collected: National Medical Admissions Test (NMAT) scores, pre-Medicine general weighted average grade (MedGWAG). Average and individual subject scores in the PLE were retrieved for this study. Statistical analysis using the Pearson correlation analysis was performed using STATA.
RESULTS: The NMAT, MedGWAG and PLE scores of the direct and lateral entrants were not significantly different from each other. There was weak correlation between NMAT and Pre-Med GWAG and weak to moderate correlation between NMAT and Med GWAG. Except for the 2009 graduates where no correlation between NMAT and PLE scores was noted for 2004-2008 graduates. There was moderate to strong correlation between Pre-Med GWAG and Med GWAG and weak correlation between Pre-Med GWAG and PLE scores. There was strong correlation between Med GWAG and PLE scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-Med GWAG had higher correlations to Med GWAG than NMAT scores. In Terms of PLE scores, the Medicine GWAG showed the highest correlation followed by Pre-Med GWAG, then NMAT scores.
Schools, Medical ; Licensure ; Medicine ; Physicians ; Academic Performance
4.Job profile and description of the administrative staff and research, extension and professional staff (REPS) in a college in a national university.
Tammy L. Dela Rosa ; Jupiter Kelly H. Barroa ; Ma. Katrina Diana M. Cruz ; Marjorie M. De Lima ; Tita L. Dimaano ; Fevito A. Obidos, Jr.
Acta Medica Philippina 2017;51(2):69-73
OBJECTIVES:This study aims to determine demographics, job suitability, job satisfaction and perception among the administrative staff and research, extension and professional staff (REPS) of the University of the Philippines Manila College of Medicine.
METHODS:This is a descriptive study. A questionnaire was developed and administered to 71 administrative employees and Research, Extension and Professional Staff (REPS) to assess job profile, actual duties and responsibilities of the official job position/title during a period of five years from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014.
RESULTS:There are 71 employees of the University of the Philippines College of Medicine (UPCM), 61 administrative staff and 10 REPS. A majority (62%) have been with the UPCM for more than 15 years. Sixty-two employees had complete information and among these, 45 (72.6%) were hired for jobs related to their educational backgrounds. All employees underwent some form of training as part of staff development (2.56 courses/employee/year) and the staff recognized that these courses enhanced their ability to do their jobs (95.3%). However, the staff also feel that they attend many other courses (66.4% of courses attended) that are not directly related to their jobs, with only 33.6% of these courses having any bearing on the performance of their specific jobs. Survey results showed that job satisfaction and perception of the value of their work is generally high. However, sources of dissatisfaction include being assigned tasks by people other than their immediate supervisor, not enough time to do their jobs and duties assigned that are not within their job description.
CONCLUSION:Most employees of the UPCM have a high level of satisfaction with their jobs. Cited factors for this include job is essential to the organization as a whole. Some areas are seen to be sources of dissatisfaction. These include mismatch between training and actual duties, work assigned by people other than their supervisors, too little time allotted for the work assigned, and tasks expected of them that are not within their job descriptions.