1.Undergraduate Medical Students’ Perceptions on Feedback-Seeking Behaviour
Wita OKTARIA ; Diantha SOEMANTRI
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 2018;25(1):75-83
Background: The concept of feedback-seeking behaviour has been widely studied, but there is still a lack of understanding of this phenomenon, specifically in an Indonesian medical education setting. The aim of this research was to investigate medical students’ feedback-seeking behaviour in depth in one Indonesian medical school. Methods: A qualitative method was employed to explore the feedback-seeking behaviour of undergraduate medical students in the Faculty of Medicine at Universitas Lampung. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with four student groups and each group consisted of 7–10 students from the years 2012, 2013 and 2014. Data triangulation was carried out through FGDs with teaching staff, and an interview with the Head of the Medical Education Unit. Results: Study findings indicated that the motivation of students to seek feedback was underlain by the desire to obtain useful information and to control the impressions of others. Students will tend to seek feedback from someone to whom they have either a close relationship or whose credibility they value. The most common obstacle for students to seek feedback is the reluctance and fearfulness of receiving negative comments. Conclusions: Through the identification of factors promoting and inhibiting feedbackseeking behaviour, medical education institutions are enabled to implement the appropriate and necessary measures to create a supportive feedback atmosphere in the learning process.
2.Piloting a constructive feedback model for problem-based learning in medical education
Dwiretno PANGASTUTI ; Natalia WIDIASIH ; Diantha SOEMANTRI
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2022;34(2):131-143
Purpose:
Constructive feedback is key to successful teaching and learning. The unique characteristics of problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials require a unique feedback intervention. Based on the review of existing literature, we developed a feedback model for PBL tutorials, as an extension of the feedback facilitator guide of Mubuuke and his colleagues. This study was aimed to examine the perceptions of students and tutors on the feedback model that was piloted in PBL tutorials.
Methods:
This study employed a qualitative research design. The model was tested in nine online PBL sessions, selected using the maximum variation sampling strategy based on tutors’ characteristics. All sessions were observed by the researcher. Afterwards, tutors and students in the PBL sessions were interviewed to explore their perceptions of the model.
Results:
Three themes were identified based on the perceptions of the tutors and students: cognitive changes, behavioral changes, and challenges of the use of the feedback model. Both tutors and students benefited from improved cognition and behavior. However, the use of the feedback model still encountered some challenges, such as limited sources of feedback data, flexibility and adaptability of the model, content of feedback delivered, students’ characteristics and performance, tutors’ characteristics and self-perceptions, and supportive infrastructure.
Conclusion
The model can be used as a reference for tutors to deliver constructive feedback during PBL tutorials. The challenges identified in using the constructive feedback model include the need for synchronized guidelines, ample time to adapt to the model, and skills training for tutors.
3.Stereotypes among health professions in Indonesia: an explorative study
Sri DARMAYANI ; Ardi FINDYARTINI ; Natalia WIDIASIH ; Diantha SOEMANTRI
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2020;32(4):329-341
Purpose:
Effective and efficient health services require efforts to increase collaboration among health professionals. One of the barriers to effective collaboration is stereotypes. Stereotypes represent perceptions or perspectives about a person or group of people. This study aims to explore the perceptions of health professional students and practitioners regarding stereotypes.
Methods:
This was a qualitative study using a phenomenology approach. A sample of health professions students from both preclinical and clinical stages, as well as health practitioners, was selected using a maximum variation sampling method. Primary data collection was conducted through focus group discussions. Data obtained were analyzed using thematic analysis. A total of nine focus group discussions were conducted.
Results:
Four themes were identified from this study, including the types of stereotypes, factors affecting stereotype formation, the implications of stereotypes, and how to overcome stereotypes. Stereotype formation was affected by the lack of understanding of other health professions’ roles, hierarchical culture, personal experience in receiving healthcare, and community view. Stereotypes among health professionals created obstacles to healthcare team communication and reduced self-confidence in certain health professionals. These stereotypes may be overcome through competency development and knowledge sharing among professionals as well as through education on other health care professionals’ roles and competencies so that each profession possessed similar goals for patient safety.
Conclusion
Both positive and negative stereotypes negatively affected collaboration. Stereotypes were greatly affected by multifactorial causes. Therefore, understanding other professions’ roles and conducting interprofessional education are important to overcome stereotypes.
4.Stereotypes among health professions in Indonesia: an explorative study
Sri DARMAYANI ; Ardi FINDYARTINI ; Natalia WIDIASIH ; Diantha SOEMANTRI
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2020;32(4):329-341
Purpose:
Effective and efficient health services require efforts to increase collaboration among health professionals. One of the barriers to effective collaboration is stereotypes. Stereotypes represent perceptions or perspectives about a person or group of people. This study aims to explore the perceptions of health professional students and practitioners regarding stereotypes.
Methods:
This was a qualitative study using a phenomenology approach. A sample of health professions students from both preclinical and clinical stages, as well as health practitioners, was selected using a maximum variation sampling method. Primary data collection was conducted through focus group discussions. Data obtained were analyzed using thematic analysis. A total of nine focus group discussions were conducted.
Results:
Four themes were identified from this study, including the types of stereotypes, factors affecting stereotype formation, the implications of stereotypes, and how to overcome stereotypes. Stereotype formation was affected by the lack of understanding of other health professions’ roles, hierarchical culture, personal experience in receiving healthcare, and community view. Stereotypes among health professionals created obstacles to healthcare team communication and reduced self-confidence in certain health professionals. These stereotypes may be overcome through competency development and knowledge sharing among professionals as well as through education on other health care professionals’ roles and competencies so that each profession possessed similar goals for patient safety.
Conclusion
Both positive and negative stereotypes negatively affected collaboration. Stereotypes were greatly affected by multifactorial causes. Therefore, understanding other professions’ roles and conducting interprofessional education are important to overcome stereotypes.
5.Formulating a Need-Based Faculty Development Model for Medical Schools in Indonesia
Riry Ambarsarie ; Rita Mustika ; Diantha Soemantri
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences 2019;26(6):90-100
Background: The focus of medical schools in developing countries is on fulfilling a
quantity of faculty members. A faculty development model will help formulate programmes
that accommodate faculty members’ needs as well as institutional demands. This study aims to
formulate a faculty development model relevant for medical schools in developing countries,
specifically Indonesia.
Methods: This is a qualitative study with a phenomenological approach. It starts with a
literature review using large databases, followed by interviews with 10 representative experts from
medical schools in Indonesia.
Results: Based on the 10 studies retrieved, several components of faculty development
were identified as the basis for the model. Ten experts gave input for the model. Components
of the model can be grouped into: (i) content, which is materials that need to be delivered;
(ii) process components, which depict aspects related to the preparation, execution and evaluation
of sustainable faculty development; and (iii) components in the educational system that affect
faculty development implementation.
Conclusion: A comprehensive review and development process has likely made this
faculty development model suitable for medical schools in Indonesia. Breaking the model into
components may help medical schools to prioritise certain aspects related to faculty development
programmes.
6.Admission policies and methods at crossroads: a review of medical school admission policies and methods in seven Asian countries
Diantha SOEMANTRI ; Indika KARUNATHILAKE ; Jen-Hung YANG ; Shan-Chwen CHANG ; Chyi-Her LIN ; Vishna D. NADARAJAH ; Hiroshi NISHIGORI ; Dujeepa D. SAMARASEKERA ; Shuh Shing LEE ; Lilybeth R. TANCHOCO ; Gominda PONNAMPERUMA
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2020;32(3):243-256
Selecting the right applicants is an important part of medical student admission. While one universally accepted selection criterion is academic capacity, there are other criteria such as communication skills and local criteria (e.g., socio-cultural values) that are no less important. This article reviews the policies and methods of selection to medical schools in seven countries with varying socio-economic conditions and healthcare systems. Senior academics involved in medical education in Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Taiwan completed a pre-agreed pro-forma per each country to describe the country’s admission policies and methods. The details were then compared and contrasted. This review identifies tension between many of the policies and methods used in medical school admissions, such as between the need to assess non-cognitive abilities and widen access, and between the need for more medical professionals and the requirement to set high entry standards. Finding the right balance requires careful consideration of all variables, including the country’s human resource needs; socio-economic status; graduates’ expected competencies; and the school’s vision, mission, and availability of resources.