ObjectiveTo investigate the expression of protein inhibitor of activated STAT-1 ( PIAS1 )in rat with acute pancreatitis (AP) and study its prediction value for severity and prognosis.MethodsSD rats were randomly divided into control,acute edematous pancreatitis (AEP),and acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) groups with 15 rats in each group.The rats were sacrificed at 0.5,6,16,24,48,72 h postoperatively.Serum CRP and amylase levels were determined.Water content of pancreas was measured.The pancreatic tissue was routinely harvested and underwent pathologic examination and was scored.The PIAS1protein expression was measured by Western blot and immunohistochemistry method.The survival rates at 72h were recorded and the risk analysis of multiple factors was investigated by Cóx regression method.ResultsThe pathologic score,water content of pancreas,serum CRP and amylase levels at 16h in ANP group were (7.70 ±2.55),(2.91 ±0.57)％,(0.36 ±0.05)mg/L,(3141 ±625)U/L,which were significandy higher than those in AEP group [(2.60 ±1.04),(2.04 ±0.47)％,(0.24 ±0.05)mg/L,(1984 ± 637)U/L)],and also significantly higher than those in control group [ (0.80 ±0.42),( 1.21 ±0.27)％,(0.14 ±0.03)mg/L,(978 ± 353) U/L,(P ＜ 0.05or 0.01 ) ].The survival time of ANP rats was [ (26.36 ± 3.41 ) h,95％ CI:19.67～33.06 h],which were significantly shorter than that in AEP group [ (57.26 ±4.16)h,95％ CI:49.11 ～ 65.42) ],and also significantly shorter than that in control group [ (71.33 ±0.54) h,95％ CI:70.26 ～71.40,P ＜0.01 ].The expression of PIAS1 at 16h in ANP group was significantly lower than those in AEP group and control group ( 0.10 ± 0.01 vs.0.80 ± 0.07,0.87 ± 0.05,P ＜ 0.01 ).The Cox analysis suggested that PIAS1 was an independent prognosis factor for the survival time of AP rats.ConclusionsPIAS1 is lowly to moderately expressed in ANP,and is negatively correlated with AP severity,and may be an independent risk factor for the prediction of severity and prognosis of AP.

Objective To investigate whether the colonoscopy skills could be retained after the endoscopy simulator training,and to find evidence for curriculum design.Methods A total of 14 trainees received virtual reality simulator colonoscopy training and took a standardized VR colonoscopy test at the end of training and at 6 months later without practice during the time period.Results Scores drastically decreased at 6 months after training when compared to those right after the training.Although there was no difference in safety or accuracy,there was significant difference in the residual air volume,intestinal loop and procedure time.Conclusion Some skills acquired by using the Endoscopy Simulator can be retained,but other skills may be lost,which requires more practice.