Radical resection is still the only possible cure for gallbladder cancer nowadays. Rational procedures vary according to different TNM stages, locations and biological behavior of tumor. Diagnostic laparoscopic exploration offers the opportunity to identify peritoneal metastasis which may be negative on preoperative radiological findings. Besides, this can also minimize trauma to abdomen. Therefore, laparoscopic exploration is suggested in cases highly suspected of peritoneal metastasis. For incidental gallbladder cancer, radical surgery should be performed because of positive margin of cystic duct, inadequate trocar management or advanced tumor stages. Timing for reoperation is still controversial. Most scholars recommended that it should be proceed within two months after the first surgery.

From the first Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in 1994 to the first Da Vinci robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy(RPD) in 2003, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy has achieved a breakthrough after 20-year exploration and development.It is a well-established procedure for periampullary carcinomas in some specialized centers now.Some outstanding reports including large clinical trials more than 100 cases of L/RPD in a single center and review analysis about the short and long outcomes between L/RPD and open PD for large cases have been published.For the sake of increasing popularity and acceptance of L/RPD, it is very important for researchers to update the current status of L/RPD and summarize experience and development.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility,effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. MethodsIn this study 16 cases underwent initial totally laparoscopic splenectomy and paraesophagogastric devascularization,with 10 cases undergoing upfront open surgery as controls by one treatment group.Clinical data including operative time,intraoperative blood loss,post-operative complications and hospitalization were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the laparoscopic group the procedure was successfully performed in 12 cases.4 cases were converted to open surgery.The operative time in laparoscopic group and the open group was respectively (315 ± 77 ) min and (291± 31) min (P =0.384).The mean intro-operative blood loss was (409 ±216) ml and (980 ±402) ml (P ＜0.01).The post-operative stay was ( 10 ± 3 ) d and ( 17 ± 8 ) d ( P ＜ 0.01).Differences in post-operative complication rate between the two groups was not statistically significant ( 17％ vs.30％,P =0.525 ).ConclusionsLaparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization is feasible,effective and safe for cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension,it has the advantage of less intra-operative blood loss,less pain and shorter hospitalization than open surgery.

Objective To evaluate the management strategy for gallbladder carcinoma found during the procedure of intended laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) Methods Twenty one cases of primary gallbladder carcinoma were incidently found during a period of 1996-2003, among them 17 cases of Nevin stage Ⅱ、Ⅲ and Ⅳ were divided into group A (6 cases) converted to open radical resection, and group B (11 cases) treated by LC ? 2 test and Kaplan Meier analysis were used to analyze postoperative survival rates Results (1) Two Nevin stage Ⅰ cases are still alive for 6 and 47 months at a follow up after LC; (2) For stage Ⅱ、 Ⅲ and Ⅳ patients, open surgery resulted a much longer survival ( ? 2=4 55, P =0 0328) Conclusion (1) For Nevin stage Ⅰ patients, simple LC is enough; (2) Patients of Nevin stage Ⅱ、 Ⅲ and Ⅳ should be coverted to open radical resection

Objective To evaluate the effects of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with intraoperative cholanggiography (IOC)and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOEST) for the treatment of cholecystocholedocolithiasis. Methods 106 cases with cholecystocholedocolithiasis diagnosed and treated by LC combined with IOC and IOEST were reviewed retrospectively. Results 60 40%(64/106)patients diagnosed cholelithiasis pre-LC were found choledocholithisis; LC combined with IOC and IOEST was successfully performed on 99 of 106 cases(93 40%),and their CBD stones were completely cleared in 98 of 99 cases(99 00%). Six cases(6 1%) were complicated with mild acute pancreatitis, 1 case(0 01%) with duodenal perforation,1 case(0 01%) with bile leakage, and 2 cases(0 02%) with stomach stasis. Conclusions LC combined with IOC and IOEST was a safe ,effective approach to diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Objective To discuss the technique and clinical value of laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) without using Endo-GIA combined with pericardial devascularization for the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension. Methods From March 2005 to October 2006, 23 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension-induced lower esophageal varices were treated with LS combined with pericardial devascularization. In 18 of the cases, the spleen was resected by disconnection of the secondary splenic pedicle without using endo-GIA. During the operation, the splenic vessels were separated and disconnected by using absorbable clip or ligation respectively. And then the lesser omentum was cut using ultrasonic knife, and the pericardial varices devascularization was performed using the absorbable clips or ultrasonic knife. Finally, the spleen was placed into a bag, broken into small pieces, and removed from an enlarged trocar hole. Results The operation was completed successfully in the 18 cases. The mean operation time was 255 min (range,180-320 min). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 450 ml (range, 200-1600 ml). After the operation, 2 patients developed plural effusion, 1 had subphrenic abscess, and 2 had mild ascites. The subphrenic abscess was cure by ultrasonography-guided puncture. The mean hospitalization was 7.5 days (range 6 to 17 days). No mortality occurred. All the patients were followed up for an averge of 16.4 months (range 5 to 24 months). No patient died after the operation. The mean hospital stay was 7.5 days (6-17 days). The cases were followed up for 5-24 months (mean, 16.4 months). One patient developed rebleeding 20 months after the operation, and was cured by injecting sclerosing agent under a gastroscope. The other 17 cases had no hemorrhage after the operation.Conclusions It is a low-cost and superior method to disconnect the secondary splenic pedicle without using endo-GIA in LS combined with pericardial devascularization for the treatment of cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Objective To explore the treatment of primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNET).Methods The therapeutic treatments of 9 PHNET patients from January 2003 to January 2010 in 3 hospitals were retrospective analyzed and followed up.Results Diagnosis of PHNET was confirmed immunohistochemically and by excluding extrahepatic primary sites.The survival is significantly dependent on tumor resectability.One patient received only radiotherapy and one with only chemotherapy,one with radiofrequency ablation.Six patients received R0 resection,one received postoperative radiotherapy,one with TACE perioperatively and internal radiotherapy.Two patients were lost to follow up 3 patients died and 4 were alive.Intrahepatic recurrence was found in 1 patient and metastasis to bone in 2 patients.Survival time ranged from 11 days to 66 months.Conclusions PHNET is an extremely rare entity with difficulty in early diagnosis.Curative liver resection integrated with transarterial chemoembolization or radiotherapy is considered to be an effective modality.

Objective To evaluate the concept of artery first and total mesopancreatic excision in radical resection of pancreatic head carcinoma through both anterior and posterior approaches.Method The anterior approach was to identify the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the posterior approach to confirm the possibility of negative margin at the origin of SMA,on the posterio-lateral vascular wall of superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and the supposed posterior of the mesopancreas.The resection scope were with the celiac trunk and common hepatic artery as the upper boarder,the SMA as the left boarder,the inferior mesenteric vein (IMA) level as the lower boarder,to achieve a complete mesopancreatic excision,namely the en bloc resection of all the involved nerve,the lymph tissue and vascular tissue along the right side of the axial composed by SMA and celiac trunk.Results Of the 15 patients,11 had radical Whipple procedure,among which 2 had a combining SMV resection and reconstruction.1 case suffered from delayed gastric emptying and 2 cases from bile leakage.There was no mortality.The postoperative pathology reported carcinoma in all 11 cases,with duodenum and low bile duct involved in 4 cases,with the duodenum involved in 6 cases,no surrounding tissue involvement was identified in 1 case.Nerve involvement was found in 7 (7/11),vascular involvement in 10 (10/11),and lymphnode metastasis was (2.5 ± 3.8/12.9 ± 4.9).Conclusions The radical resection of pancreatic head carcinoma using the concept of artery first and the total mesopancreatic excision is helpful for an early evaluation of the possibility of radical resection and guarantees negative margins.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOEST) for the diagnosis and treatment of choledocolithiasis. Methods Statistical analysis was carried out for 106 patients with cholecystocholedocolithiasis diagnosed and treated by LC-IOC-IOEST. Results Sixty-four (60.4%, 64/106 ) patients with preoperative diagnosis of simple gall stone were found with complicated choledocholithisis; LC-IOC -IOEST was successfully performed in 99(93.4%, 99/106) cases. Six cases (6.1%) suffered from mild postoperative acute pancreatitis. Duodenal perforation, bile leakage, peumothorax (0.9%) developed in one each. Duodenal adenocarcinoma was overlooked in one case, and 2 cases (1.8%) suffered from gastric paralysis. Conclusion LC combined with IOC and IOEST was a safe, effective approach to the diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Objective To analyze our experience on laparoscopic and Da Vinci robotic radical pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with major vascular resection and reconstruction,and to expand the indications of surgery for patients with pancreatic cancer.Methods From December 2013 to January 2016,67 patients underwent laparoscopic and Da Vinci robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in our department.The resection was combined with major vein resection in 5 patients.We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of these patients who had laproscopic or Da Vinci robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with major vascular resection and reconstruction.Results The mean operation time was 378 (360 ～ 480) minutes,and the mean estimated blood loss was 360 (120 ～450) ml.4 patients underwent laparoscopic wedge-resection of PV/SMV without interruption of blood flow.After pancreaticoduodenectomy using the superior mesentery artery first approach,one patient underwent resection of a segment of portal vein and superior mesenteric vein followed by an end to end anastomosis using the Da Vinci robotic system.The total blood flow occlusion time was 35 minutes.Intraoperative frozen section biopsy and postoperative pathological results were chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic cancer in all these patients.The veins were invaded by tumor in 3 patients.In the remaining 2 patients,the vascular wall showed chronic inflammation.All the surgical resection margins were tumor negative.Postoperative complications included one patient with bile leakage,one patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and one patient with a grade A pancreatic fistula (PF).The patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding was managed successfully using hemostatic treatment under gastroscopy,and the other patients all recovered well after conservative therapy.There was no death in this study.The mean postoperative hospitalization stay was 14 (9 ～35) days.Conclusions Laparoscopic or Da Vinci robotic radical pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with major vascular resection is safe and feasible in selected patients with pancreatic cancer.However,surgeons need to be experienced at both open pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection and at standard laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.